Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England explain dropping Underhill and reveal Tuilagi setback

(Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Eddie Jones has explained the absence of Sam Underhill and Manu Tuilagitwo starters in the win last time out versus the Springboks at Twickenham in November – from the 36-man England squad he named on Tuesday for the upcoming Guinness Six Nations campaign which starts away to Scotland on February 5. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Underhill has played just three games for Bath in the weeks since England saw out their Autumn Nations Series with a three-wins-from-three record, while Tuilagi hasn’t featured for Sale since he limped out of England’s last match after scoring against South Africa. 

Jones made allowances for other players who emerged from that Test series injured. For instance, skipper Owen Farrell has yet to feature for Saracens since his injury versus Australia (he returns to action next weekend) while clubmate Jamie George has played just twice since his injury in that same Test match.

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones announces England’s new-generation 2022 Six Nations squad

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones announces England’s new-generation 2022 Six Nations squad

However, this leeway being applied to Farrell and George regarding their selection in the 2022 Six Nations squad hasn’t been mirrored regarding Underhill and Tuilagi. “Sam is not quite ready,” explained Jones about the back-rower who shipped a head knock on Boxing Day playing for Bath versus Gloucester. “He has had a fairly truncated period since the autumn but we are hopeful he will get himself fit and match ready for later in the tournament.”

As regards Tuilagi, Sale boss Alex Sanderson had recently suggested the midfielder was close to a comeback but that no longer appears to be the case. Jones revealed: “He has had a wee setback but we will just have to wait and see what he is up to. He needs to get some training, needs to play a few games. If we are 100 per cent optimistic we’d say yes (he will feature in the Six Nations). If we are realistic it’s probably about a 50/50.”

Jones also described the situation regarding Elliot Daly, the most used Lions player who came back from the South African tour with an injury before eventually lining out for Saracens in December, as similar to Underhill. “Elliot is a bit the same. He hasn’t played a lot of rugby, needs to get some good match fitness and some good match form behind him.”

Farrell was named as the England skipper of a 36-strong squad that included six uncapped playersOrlando Bailey, Alfie Barbeary, Ollie Chessum, Tommy Freeman, Ollie Hassell-Collins and Luke Northmore – but there was no room again for the likes of George Ford and the Vunipola brothers, the three high profile November squad omissions.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search