Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England explain the selection of unheralded duo Ludlam and Isiekwe

(Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

You would have very got long odds a few weeks ago on Eddie Jones naming an England team to face Scotland this Saturday with Lewis Ludlam, Nick Isiekwe and Elliot Daly all chosen to start. Yet here we are with all three unlikely candidates – two of whom weren’t even in the original squad named for the Guinness Six Nations championship on January 18 – picked to run out at Murrayfield.  

ADVERTISEMENT

The 26-year-old Ludlam has been chosen as the England No6 in place of the unavailable Courtney Lawes. It will be just his fifth ever start at Test level and the first time in the No6 jersey since he was picked to beat the Scots in the February 2020 Calcutta Cup win in Edinburgh. 

Isiekwe’s track record is even more minuscule. The 23-year-old toured Argentina and South Africa years ago under Jones as the next bright young thing but until this weekend he hadn’t added to his three caps, a haul where his most recent appearance came as a starter in June 2018 versus the Springboks in Johannesburg. 

Video Spacer

Facing Goliath | A story following Italy as they take on the mighty All Blacks | A Rugby Originals Documentary

Video Spacer

Facing Goliath | A story following Italy as they take on the mighty All Blacks | A Rugby Originals Documentary

He was named as an injury cover call-up for the Brighton training week when it became apparent that Jonny Hill was struggling with a stress fracture and despite that unheralded ‘cover’ status, he has since forced his way up the pecking order to earn an England start alongside Maro Itoje, his Saracens colleague. 

Another from Sarries with a great reason to smile following Jones’ Test team announcement on Thursday was Daly, who just a few weeks back was deemed surplus to requirement when a 36-strong squad was originally named for Six Nations training. He had returned from the Lions as the only touring player to play a part in all eight matches in South Africa but a shin issue required an operation which left him playing catch-up with England until now.   

Related

Jones has no qualms about including Ludlam and Isiekwe, explained how both have similar sort of stories in that they got an early look-in with England, suffered a dip and have taken a bit of time to bounce back. “They have done really well,” enthused the England coach after naming an XV showing seven changes from the starting team that saw off the Springboks at Twickenham in November.

“With Courtney unavailable at six, Lewis has been one of the outstanding back-rowers in the Premiership. We brought him into the World Cup squad in 2019 out of nowhere. He suffered a little bit of a dip in form post the World Cup, which is not unusual for young players, but he has fought his way back really hard, got the basics of his game in place and he is a good tough competitor. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“Nick Isiekwe is not dissimilar but he was a little bit earlier (in the England set-up). We took him on the 2018 tour to South Africa, showed enough promise to be given his first cap. Had a difficult game, was a bit up and down in his club rugby but over the last twelve months he has been one of the outstanding locks in the Premiership and with Maro forms a pair that we think can shade Scotland in the lineouts and his play around the ruck is first class.”

Switching to the backs, where the inclusion of the seasoned Daly for a first England start at outside centre since a November 2016 match-up with South Africa allowed Henry Slade to switch into No12 in the absence of the injured Manu Tuilagi with Max Malins named on the wing, Jones added: “Max is a very good winger cum full-back. 

“Elliot, it was a choice between either him or Joe Marchant at 13. We just feel Elliot has a little bit more experience and we feel like he is in really good form. Joe had a bit of a troubled preparation for this game (a spell in isolation) but he will be able to fit in on the wing well.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search