Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England issue Tom Curry update; explain why defence has been so leaky

(Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Kevin Sinfield has hinted that Tom Curry is ready to play for England at the Rugby World Cup after an absence that affected their defence during the recent Summer Nations Series. Steve Borthwick’s side arrived in France having won just one of their four matches in August and worryingly leaked a pile of tries in their warm-ups versus Wales (twice), Ireland and Fiji.

ADVERTISEMENT

Those games took place with Curry being unavailable for selection. It emerged on August 11 that he had rolled an ankle at training and that injury resulted in him travelling across the Channel last Thursday as the only member of the 33-strong England squad not to have played a single minute of their four-game warm-up programme.

Assistant coach Sinfield, though, has delivered an encouraging update on Curry’s status, suggesting he is line to play this Saturday versus Argentina despite not featuring in selection last month. “Everybody has trained again today [Tuesday] so clean bill of health. Everybody is ready,” insisted Sinfield from England base camp in Le Touquet-Paris-Plage.

Asked specifically about Curry and his availability, Sinfield continued: “To be at this stage given the bumps and bruises we have had over the last few weeks, we are in a really good position so it’s great to see him out there. He has been really good. I have mentioned back rows before to you and how important they are to our defence, yeah he has been excellent.”

But can he play against Argentina with no warm-up minutes behind him? “We have no doubt about that. He has got a number of caps under his belt now and he has been doing it for years. He can play a number of positions across the back row for us so delighted he is available.”

Team Form

Last 5 Games

1
Wins
2
1
Streak
2
19
Tries Scored
15
22
Points Difference
-25
3/5
First Try
1/5
4/5
First Points
1/5
3/5
Race To 10 Points
1/5

One follow-up question initially stumped Sinfield. After getting asked why the England defence hadn’t been putting its best foot forward, an awkward silence filled the media room. Bear in mind the England defence under Sinfield’s watch since the start of 2023 had conceded 30 tries in nine matches.

Eventually, an answer came, the defence coach suggesting: “Good question. It really helps having Tom Curry back available. Some of the suspensions that we have had to contend with over the last couple of weeks certainly haven’t helped.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Some of the back row changes we have had to make probably haven’t helped too. I do see a team here that are improving, I do see a team that are getting better.

“I also understand and I am very realistic we have not been good enough so far so we are working incredibly hard to be better this week and I have complete belief and confidence in the group where we are going.

“I have seen a very slight change in how we have gone about our business this week and we needed to have that change. We needed to make that adjustment but I have to say I have really enjoyed my time with the guys.

“I have not been happy with the results, I have not been happy with the tries we have conceded but I do understand as well where we are going and I really enjoy working with the guys and I believe in them.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s great to be here. The boys have worked incredibly hard over the last 12 weeks. To be here in the sunshine in September is quite unique, isn’t it? We are looking forward you what is to come, a huge challenge at the weekend.

“We feel like we haven’t hit our straps at all and we have not performed well enough but we know and have seen the growth in this team and we have seen it on the training field for some time now. We’re looking forward to the weekend.

“We have been quite clear over August that those Test matches meant something to us so to be one (win) from four is disappointing for us, we don’t feel it justified how well we have trained.

“But I also understand as a defensive coach we have also got to be better as well, we can’t concede as many tries as we have but the boys have worked incredibly hard to fix that. We’ll look forward to taking a big step this weekend.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
F
Fish Food 473 days ago

Sinfield is an incredible character and super human being, but his record as England's defence coach to date is dire. Could find himself being out of a job if it continues in the same vein at RWC2023...

K
KiwiSteve 473 days ago

More like the £500000 boys Itoje, Genge and Sinkler can't be bothered. The others just not good enough. Lawes being the exception and the only one who constantly gives everything. Unfortunately that is not enough. Then in the backs May, Malins, Daly, Manu (wrapped in cotton wool) and Steward cannot defend for toffee which leaves Farrell literally shouldering the responsibility and trying to stop the ball going out wide by taking people's heads off.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search