Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England call up lock to replace banned Charlie Ewels

Charlie Ewels /PA

Charlie Ewels will miss the rest of England summer tour after he copped a ban after he was red-carded for his reckless clearout on Japanese captain Michael Leitch on Saturday in Tokyo.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ewels managed to get red-carded despite being on the field for just six minutes and having been sent off in his last international appearance for England.

His latest ban could now spell the end of his international career.

It has been confirmed that England head coach Steve Borthwick has called up Nick Isiekwe in his place. The Saracens second row will arrive in Auckland on Tuesday ahead of England’s two-Test tour of New Zealand to take on the All Blacks.

Video Spacer

Springbok coach Rassie Erasmus reveals what plans he has to get the squad together ahead of the two-Test series against Ireland

Video Spacer

Springbok coach Rassie Erasmus reveals what plans he has to get the squad together ahead of the two-Test series against Ireland

With England on the attack in the 73rd minute, Ewels misjudged his clear-out at a breakdown as he came in from the side and hit his shoulder into Leitch’s knee – leaving the Japan captain in agony on the ground.

Ewels attended a hearing before an independent Disciplinary Committee on 23 June 2024 for an offence contrary to Law 9.20(a) (dangerous charging in a ruck) relating to the incident.

The independent Disciplinary Committee was chaired by Shao-ing Wang of Singapore and joined by former international players David Croft of Australia and John Langford of Australia.

The player accepted that foul play had occurred but maintained that the offence did not warrant a red card.

A World Rugby statement reads: “Having considered all the available evidence, the submissions by the player and his representative, and all available camera angles, the independent Committee determined that the red card was warranted.

“The Committee considered the degree appropriate entry point for the offending and decided that the offence warranted a low-end entry point of 2 matches. Having considered submissions as regards mitigation, the Committee did not apply mitigation to the sanction resulting in a final sanction of 2 matches.”

The player is suspended for the matches New Zealand v England on 6 July 2024 and New Zealand v England on 13 July 2024. He has the right to appeal within 48 hours of the issuing of the full written decision.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
f
finn 181 days ago

I had assumed it would be Tuima getting the call up

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search