Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England regain power on the pitch but suffer £30.9 million pound loss off it

Twickenham Stadium (Getty Images)

Eddie Jones may have put England’s Chariot back on track for next year’s World Cup in Japan after an impressive November series, but his Rugby Football Union bosses have suffered a £30.9m loss and deny they are “moving money around” to try and hide the deficit.

ADVERTISEMENT

The biggest and most financially powerful Union in the World has made 54 redundancies and had to deal with an overspend of around £40m to finish Twickenham’s East Stand. However, despite taking a massive financial hit, the RFU today made it clear Jones’s World Cup budget is ring fenced and insisted they were not hiding the loss by claiming a one off cash injection of £31.6m meant they effectively broke even .

The £31.6m comes from a restructuring of money from selling the Twickenham Experience Limited hospitality business to Compass and that money has gone into the RFU reserve fund. Steve Brown, the outgoing RFU chief executive, confirmed that under the deal it would have to be bought back in 2028.

He said: “We are absolutely not just moving money around. The asset (Twickenham Experience Ltd ) has become worth significantly more and that new value generates an income. That large liability will have to be paid back, but the business in 2028 will be worth substantially more.

“Let’s get this straight; the £30.9 loss is mirrored by the £31.6m input which is in a different part of the accounts and we are effectively at break even and it would be wrong to be report the loss in isolation”

Brown is quitting at the end of the year forcing the RFU to hastily find someone new he insists he is not jumping ship due to the Union’s accounts which reveal revenue for the last financial year of £172.4m with investment in the sport at all levels of £107m. The profit after tax was £83.3m and the RFU has increased its borrowing facility to £100m.

ADVERTISEMENT

Brown said: “I am leaving for my own reasons and I don’t think the ship could be in better shape after the last seven or eight years. The World will always change and we are in the best position to move with change. It is a great time for someone to take over and move this to the next level. We are in a sound and solid position and the £25m we have in our reserves is sufficient for World Cup year to ride the loss without any November tests and there will be another financial report before then and we will make a profit next year and add to the reserves.

“We need to plan more prudently, given the recent rise in our fixed cost base, driven largely by the Professional Game Agreement (PGA) and Elite Playing Squad (EPS) fees, which were negotiated when our revenue outlook was more optimistic, and by stadium depreciation.”

Sue Day the Chief Financial officer of the RFU revealed: “Rugby investment for the year totalled £107.7m and was split between professional rugby at £70.7m and rugby development at £37.0m. The RFU has enjoyed unprecedented revenue growth over the last eight years or so, which has enabled record levels of investment in rugby. However, looking to the future we know now that the financial outlook will be tougher. There will be less money to spend both on running the business and on investing in rugby.”

“As a result, rugby investment is likely to come down from the over £100m averaged over the past three years to around £95m per year, still a very substantial sum, but one we need to adjust to in 2019/20 and beyond.

ADVERTISEMENT

“During the period under review we reduced overheads by £1.1m, with a further focus on efficiency in June 2018 leading to a consultation process with our staff as part of the 2018/19 business planning process. As a result, 62 roles were made redundant across the organisation although, with the creation of some new roles as part of the process, 54 people actually left the RFU. While this was not an easy decision to make, it was however necessary to ensure the financial stability of the Union going forward in more challenging times.”

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Lions Share | Episode 4

Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

I
IkeaBoy 50 minutes ago
Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

Very, very thoughtful piece!


It’s far too much rugby for players as it stands and the new competitions - club world cup and Nations cup - are proposed on the basis it’s the best players competing who will usually be established test players.


An established NH test player is in pre-season from August (at the latest) then going thorough until the following July. They likely will have carried niggles and some injuries into their pre-season. They would then have between 22-30 domestic games if their teams went far and contested finals in say the URC and CC. Although many would have stand down periods, they would still train and be squad ready for all of those games.


Their test commitments across that same time would be 3/4 games (Nov series) then 5 games (6 Nations) with a rest for the July development tours. That rest would only now be once every 4 years with the Lions, Nations Cup and RWC warm-ups occupying the July window.


A squad player at club level would potentially have a full run of games in any given season but run a greater risk of injury the more often they play. They would likely know that form alone wouldn’t get them to the next level and into a national squad. It would be their bodies and their ability to recover quickly and deal with elite level competition. They wouldn’t have the baseline of having played an 11 month season so how could they upsurge a 40 cap player?


I think there will be a huge divide before long between solid club players, who are basically salary men, and the ringfenced test animals who will likely dwindle in numbers as their playing demands increase.

13 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us