Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England player ratings vs France

A dejected England side during a testing 80 minutes against France in Paris. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Paris played host to the latest edition of ‘Le Crunch’ on Sunday afternoon, with a rejuvenated French side running out 24-17 victors in what is one of the most emotionally-charged rivalries in international rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

England struggled to impose themselves physically or in attack throughout the game and the lack of incision in the latter, outside of two Jonny May solo efforts, will be particularly worrying for Eddie Jones and his side as they prepare for the Calcutta Cup in Scotland next week.

We have rated all 23 of England’s players below.

  1. George Furbank – 5

The full-back did well defensively and aerially on debut, although he struggled to make the offensive impact he would have liked. On two occasions, he spilled passes from George Ford, the first of which was low and difficult to take, although the second the Northampton Saint was guilty of over-running.

Continue reading below…

Watch: Andy Farrell and Jonny Sexton face the press after Ireland’s 19-12 win over Scotland

Video Spacer

  1. Jonny May7

Even England’s Mr Consistent struggled to impress against France in the first half. He missed a couple of tackles on the kick chase, stopped chasing back for Charles Ollivon’s first try and was unable to involve himself offensively for much of the game. He turned it around in the second half, however, as he scored two excellent solo tries and reignited England’s hopes of a win.

  1. Manu Tuilagi6

The centre carried physically twice early in the first half and looked to be set for a strong game in Paris, although he left the field with an injury shortly after making that impact.

  1. Owen Farrell4

An uncustomary quiet and ineffective showing from Farrell, whose positive attacking impact was limited and even included a couple of rare handling errors. He successfully connected with all three of his kicks, though.

  1. Elliot Daly4

Like May, it was a largely quiet performance from Daly. He was safe defensively and, for the most part, dealing with the high ball, although there was little he could to positively impact the game in attack. A booming kick that rolled out of the back of France’s 22 also denied England some momentum after May’s much-needed try.

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1223904462236012544?s=20

  1. George Ford5

The fly-half’s kicking from hand radar seemed slightly off in Paris, as he tended to put too overkick and ask too much of chasers such as Maro Itoje and Sam Underhill. He was aggressive in defence, found a beautiful deep touch in the second half and had a couple of moments with the ball in hand, although it was not the commanding performance many expected of him.

  1. Ben Youngs4

It was a game to forget for Youngs, who struggled to impact the game positively in the loose. He overkicked England’s chase regularly, missed a tackle on Vincent Rattez that saw the wing scamper over for a try and his pass to Furbank, which should have ended with a score, was too low for the full-back to take comfortably and in stride.

  1. Joe Marler8

Marler was consistently impressive in Paris and took the game to the France’s debutant tighthead prop at the scrum. With England regularly overkicking their kick chase, too, Marler was frequently on hand to make a physical tackle on the French kick returner once he had made the initial chase of England miss, thanks to the time and space afforded by the kick.

  1. Jamie George6

After some early struggles, the hooker connected with nine of his 11 lineouts and was typically busy in attack and defence. The work rate was never in question, but he was unable to have the significant positive impact he usually does in the loose and the tight for England.

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1224000731553857536?s=20

  1. Kyle Sinckler7

Sinckler went very well at the scrum on Sunday afternoon, although his impact in the loose was uncharacteristically quiet. He wasn’t able to replicate the impact usually provided by the Vunipola brothers and the opportunities to show off his impressive ball-handling were few and far between.

  1. Maro Itoje6

A real mixed bag of a performance from England’s talisman who was impactful at the lineout, which included four takes, one steal and pressure on the French throws, and in defence, as he forced two knock-ons in the carry. He was unable to exert the same influence offensively, though, as he coughed up a couple of penalties and wasn’t able to impose himself as a ball-carrier.

  1. Charlie Ewels5

The lock struggled to fill the boots of George Kruis and, one impressive lineout steal aside, didn’t provide the set-piece impact that was expected. He also spilled a ball in contact to end the first half and he will need to turn in improved performances moving forward if he is to pressure Kruis, Courtney Lawes and Joe Launchbury for their spots in the squad.

  1. Courtney Lawes6

Lawes picked up the slack in terms of the quantity of ball-carrying with the Vunipola brothers missing, although he couldn’t quite replicate their incision and ability to get over the gain-line. He was strong on the fringes defensively, though, and was targeted successfully five times at the lineout by George.

ADVERTISEMENT

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1223923591303049216?s=20

  1. Sam Underhill6

A solid showing from the openside who was busy pouncing on loose balls, clearing out at the ruck in attack and offering himself as a ball-carrying option, although as with much of the England pack, his endeavour and work rate didn’t necessarily translate to execution and impact.

  1. Tom Curry5

Curry had his moments as a ball-carrier, although it was not the same standard of performance – as a No 8 – that England fans have become accustomed to seeing from Billy Vunipola. It included a knock-on and a couple of messy balls at the base of a scrum that was generally going very well for England.

Replacements

  1. Luke Cowan-Dickie6

The Exeter Chief connected with his lineouts after arriving and brought a physical edge as a ball-carrier as England fought their way back into the game.

  1. Ellis Genge7

Genge set the tone with a big tackle on Romain Ntamack just moments after his arrival. The loosehead kept up England’s scrum advantage, too, and provided them with some much-needed energy.

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1223913690010771462?s=20

  1. Will Stuart6

Limited opportunity to impact the game after coming on late.

  1. George Kruis6

Kruis had a couple of telling involvements after his introduction and will be unlucky if he does not return to the starting XV against Scotland.

  1. Lewis Ludlam6

Played with mobility and aggression after arriving, though chances to impact the game were limited.

  1. Willi Heinz6

Heinz provided much more zip and tempo to England and the team’s performance rose partly due to his introduction.

  1. Ollie Devoto – n/a

An unused replacement.

  1. Jonathan Joseph6

With France in complete control of the game for the most part, Joseph struggled to make an impact after replacing Tuilagi. He was unlucky not to have a try on a sharp inside line, which the French defence was penalised for being offside at, although England failed to capitalise on the ensuing scrum.

Watch: Don’t Mess with Jim – Jim picks his all-time Six Nations XV

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search