Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England player ratings vs Italy

England's Anthony Watson is tackled by Italy's Nicola Quaglio (No1) at St James' Park (Photo by Laurence Griffiths/Getty Images)

England finished up their World Cup preparations on Friday evening, beating Italy 37-0 at St James’ Park in Newcastle.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eddie Jones’ side signed off with a fairly disjointed performance, although that was largely to be expected with the number of changes they made for the fixture. Assuming there are not late injury concerns, the 31-man squad will now prepare to fly out to Japan on Sunday.

RugbyPass runs the rule over England’s performers in an encounter that gave them their third win in their four-match warm-up schedule.

  1. Anthony Watson6.5

Straightened the line and squared up the defence well in attack, as well as supporting both Jamie George breaks. He had one spill on a high ball when he was caught deep, although his positioning and work at the back was reliable at all other times. His incision was rewarded with a try in the final minutes.

  1. Ruaridh McConnochie5.5

Opportunities were few and far between for McConnochie on his debut. He was reliable in the air, taking a tough contested catch, although he will have wished for more chances with ball in hand to showcase his ability.

https://twitter.com/EnglandRugby/status/1170072576783204353?s=20

  1. Joe Marchant7

Marchant flashed his post-World Cup ability with a couple of outside breaks and steps back inside against the grain. He was rewarded with a weaving solo try off the back of a sharp pass from Ben Youngs.

  1. Piers Francis5.5

Some nice catch-and-pass and catch-and-offload moments from Francis, although his opportunities were limited with Italy edging possession and territory in the first half. The centre made way for George Ford early in the second half.

  1. Jonny May8

An excellent outing from the wing, who was a constant thorn in Italy’s side with his kick chase work. He also consistently found space when there was little on offer, thanks to his footwork and acceleration.

https://twitter.com/EnglandRugby/status/1170066276175306752?s=20

  1. Owen Farrell7

A strong showing on the whole, with the fly-half missing just one of his eight kicks and defending his channel resolutely throughout. His gain line play was also effective, although he did kick out on the full once as well as being charged down. Masterful timing to set up Watson’s late score.

  1. Ben Youngs7

One errant kick aside, it was a much-improved performance from Youngs, after struggling against Ireland. His box-kicks were consistently on the money, either able to be competed for or finding space, and he seemed to be in synergy with May. Picked out runners well with his distribution, particularly in the second half.

  1. Joe Marler5.5

The loosehead held his own in the scrum before making way for Ellis Genge after just 32 minutes. Put himself about in defence but wasn’t able to have too much attacking influence in his short appearance.

https://twitter.com/EnglandRugby/status/1170063614192971776?s=20

  1. Jamie George7

He connected on all three of his lineouts and was effective as a carrier in the wide channels, showing good awareness of his support and having soft hands to offload. One handling error aside, George went well in the north-east.

  1. Dan Cole6.5

Like Marler, Cole also made way after 32 minutes. In addition to his solid foundation at the scrum, the tighthead impressed with his counter-rucking, ensuring Italy had to commit plenty of players to secure the ball, as well as forcing a knock-on.

  1. Joe Launchbury5.5

The lock wrecked one Italian maul but was unable to exert too much influence before leaving the pitch after 32 minutes. He was gingerly holding his back prior to departing and Jones will be hoping he hasn’t suffered a significant injury.

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1170022567425576960?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

  1. Courtney Lawes8.5

An all-action performance from Lawes, who was the standout man in England’s pack. He was an eager carrier, regularly led the line in defence and was able to slow Italian ball at the breakdown. He was influential at the set-piece, too, taking four lineouts, creating a turnover at the maul, snagged three direct lineout steals and disrupted another.

  1. Tom Curry6

The blindside impressed with the physicality of tackling, repeatedly denying Italian carriers any sort of success on the gain line. He wasn’t quite able to have the influence on the attacking side of the ball that he had had in recent fixtures.

  1. Mark Wilson7

An extremely industrious performance from Wilson on his home turf. The flanker was physical on the gain line as both a tackler and a carrier and was seemingly ever-present in the defensive line. Also got through plenty of work clearing at the contact area.

ADVERTISEMENT

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1169889932254384129

  1. Billy Vunipola6

A solid outing from Vunipola who grew into the game and was comfortable offloading and keeping phases alive. Italy did a decent job of denying him the physical superiority he usually enjoys.

Replacements

  1. Luke Cowan-Dickie6

The hooker unfortunately departed the game with less than 10 minutes to go, walking gingerly as he did. He was perfect at the lineout in his three throws before he exited.

  1. Ellis Genge6

He did cough up a couple of penalties at the scrum, but he his overall impact from the bench was a positive one. His carrying and work at the breakdown were particularly noticeable.

https://twitter.com/EnglandRugby/status/1170070995136368640?s=20

  1. Kyle Sinckler7.5

An impressive shift from Sinckler, who not only had the edge on his opposite number at the scrum, but also offered power and intelligence as a ball-carrier. Snaffled a turnover on a charged down kick and helped turn set-piece parity into an advantage for England.

  1. Charlie Ewels6

Ewels brought a largely positive impact at the set-piece, grabbing a line steal and proving a reliable target for Cowan-Dickie. He did cough up a penalty for coming in at the side of the maul, though.

  1. Matt Kvesic5.5

Kvesic made some strong tackles after coming on, but couldn’t quite bring the same attacking impact as some of his teammates.

  1. Willi Heinz5.5

Carried on from where Youngs’ left off, although England had comfortably secured the win at that point and had begun to take their foot off the gas.

  1. George Ford6

Looked sharp after arriving and the tandem of he and Farrell certainly looked more fluid than the one consisting of Farrell and Francis in the first half. Admittedly, the latter pairing did not have the front foot ball that Ford was given by the replacements in the tight five.

  1. Joe Cokanasiga6

Continued his trend of late to look for work close to the ruck, whether as a first receiver or on the pick and go. Italian struggled to deal with his power carrying.

WATCH: The RugbyPass stadium guide to Sapporo where England will begin their World Cup campaign against Tonga 

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Cape Town | Leg 1 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

O2 Inside Line: This Rose | Episode 3 | France Week

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

R
RedWarriors 7 minutes ago
Late try spares Ireland from further ignominy in world rankings

If going on current date quality I would argue that France are well ahead of NZ and SA. Best team Ireland played since the great NZ team of 2011-2015. Hats off to them. Well ahead. I wouldn’t argue that Ireland are on current date form in really in 4th position either. While the rankings take a while to catch up, this applies to the way up as well as the way down. These things even out.


I don’t think France are too bothered about the rankings as long as they are top 4 and don’t get shafted by the draw again. Same for Ireland. Top 4 in early 2026 is whats required.


Others like Scotland are interested for other practical reasons as they need to be top6 for a ranking 1 RWC draw. While the RWC 2023 draw de facto eliminated them by putting them in a Pool with SA/IRL, England benefitted massively with an easy run to the semi. This resulted in a 6 point swing to England over the tournament. Scotland deserve a break I hope they are able to break out of that cycle. The whose no1 argument is a southern one. Some NZ supporters need evidence to back a national identity as the premier rugby nations. When the Saffers lost no1 by losing to the Argentina in the 2024 RC, 3 related articles on this platform garnered almost a thousand comments, mostly from a certain type of raging Saffer. Both camps rarely admit any other #1 team is the best unless its themselves. EG Saffers losing it (in all ways) in 2024 as above. Best leave them at it.

2 Go to comments
S
SR 31 minutes ago
Ireland player ratings vs France | 2025 Six Nations

I’d like to wade in on the Prendergarst debate. Someone on RP put it very well when they said it wasn’t the players fault it was the management for choosing him and the media for hyping him up. He may one day be a well rounded international 10 but he isn’t at he moment and Ireland risks breaking this player by putting him under pressure when he’s not ready. Shade was thrown couple of weeks ago by someone decrying NZ stock of new 10’s and boasting that the NH tams are blooding them at 21. That’s a very strange argument. We (just like any other team ) blood players when they are needed Setiti, Lakai, Roigard, Ratima ,Hotham , Kemara, Fabien Holland were all capped for AB’s or NZ 15 at 20 or 21. It’s never a perfect science. We have 4 ver y promising young tens at the Chiefs, Highlanders, Hurricanes and Crusaders. They all show coolness under pressure, great hands good vision and are growing their game management. Can any of them take the next step up to the pressure of being an AB 10? We hope so, but we won’t know for sure until they’re put there. One thing I do know is that if one of them was in that position and he was playing like Pendergast is he would be pulled. I read some media are saying well he’ll learn, be better for it. But I fear it’s going the other way. The way to learn to be an International 10 is not by being thrown in the deep end before your skillset is potentially up to the job. Please Irish Rugby take the pressure off this young man and allow him develop into the player he could be.

205 Go to comments
J
Judith Adelbert 49 minutes ago
Don't get out over your skis on the Highlanders

t all began on a chilly November evening. I was sitting at my desk, staring at the screen, my heart sinking deeper with each passing second. The numbers didn’t lie—I had lost $78,000 in a Bitcoin investment gone wrong. What started as a promising opportunity had turned into a nightmare. I had trusted the wrong platform, and my hard-earned money had vanished into the digital abyss. I felt helpless, angry, and utterly defeated. For weeks, I tried everything—contacting the platform, seeking legal advice, even reaching out to online forums for help. But the responses were either dismissive or outright scams. It seemed like my money was gone forever. That’s when I stumbled upon **Cyber Codex Revolution**, a name that kept popping up in my searches. They were a cybersecurity firm specializing in recovering lost or stolen digital assets. Skeptical but desperate, I decided to give them a shot. I reached out to their team, and within hours, I received a response. They asked for details about the transaction, the platform I used, and any evidence I had. Their professionalism gave me a glimmer of hope. After reviewing my case, they assured me they could help. They explained that their team of blockchain experts and ethical hackers would trace the funds and attempt to recover them. It wasn’t a guarantee, but it was the best chance I had. The process was intense. Over the next few weeks, the Cyber Codex Revolution team worked tirelessly. They traced the movement of my Bitcoin through the blockchain, identifying the wallets it had been transferred to. They discovered that the platform I had invested in was a sophisticated scam, designed to siphon funds into untraceable accounts. But Cyber Codex Revolution wasn’t deterred. Using advanced tools and techniques, they managed to pinpoint the location of the funds and initiated a recovery process. One evening, as I was about to give up hope, I received an email from Cyber Codex Revolution. My heart raced as I opened it. The message was simple: “We’ve successfully recovered your Bitcoin. The funds will be transferred to your secure wallet within the next 24 hours.” I couldn’t believe it. Tears of relief streamed down my face as I realized my money was coming back to me. True to their word, the next day, I saw the Bitcoin reappear in my wallet. The $78,000 I thought was lost forever was back in my possession. I couldn’t thank Cyber Codex Revolution enough. They had not only recovered my funds but also restored my faith in the digital world. From that day on, I became an advocate for cybersecurity and responsible investing. I shared my story with others, warning them about the dangers of online scams and encouraging them to seek help if they ever found themselves in a similar situation. Cyber Codex Revolution had given me a second chance, and I was determined to make the most of it.

More Information:

Email: CyberCodexRevolution@mail.com

Telegram: https://t.me/Cyber_Codex_Revolution

4 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING France player ratings vs Ireland | 2025 Six Nations France player ratings vs Ireland | 2025 Six Nations
Search