Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England Player Ratings vs Japan

Joe Cokanasiga of England scores a try during the Quilter International match between England and Japan. (Photo by Lynne Cameron/Getty Images)

England survived a major scare early against Japan to record a 35-15 victory over the Cherry Blossoms at Twickenham.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eddie Jones’ former side gave his current one all they could handle in the first half, but as England grew into the contest and sent for some reinforcements from the bench, they moved through the gears and took the game beyond the visitors.

We’ve rated all 23 of England’s performers from Saturday afternoon’s encounter.

 

  1. Elliot Daly7

The rust of not playing 15 week in, week out for his club was further knocked off, as Daly looked more of a threat on the counter-attack, as well as covering across the back field well. He was adept at identifying space, whether he was running into it or kicking into it, whilst England also made good use of his titanic boot, with the full-back knocking over a penalty from over 50m in the first half. Didn’t consistently dominate the space under the contested high balls, though.

  1. Chris Ashton6

Ashton was unfortunately subbed off just after the 30-minute mark with an apparent leg injury and didn’t have too much opportunity to influence the game. He did, however, showcase his impressive work rate on Danny Care’s early try, tracking the play from the other side of the pitch and being an option for the scrum-half, had he needed it.

  1. Jack Nowell6

He was caught narrow once early, but ultimately defended well in the challenging 13 channel, including making some important one-on-one tackles. He had a bit more influence on the attacking game once he was moved out to the wing but will be kicking himself for knocking on early in the second half when Owen Farrell had unleashed him on the outside.

  1. Alex Lozowski5

Got the shepherd’s crook at half time after struggling to influence the game positively. The centre missed a couple of crucial tackles, including the one on Ryoto Nakamura, who went over for Japan’s first try, and didn’t provide the control or incision in the role that Owen Farrell has previously provided.

  1. Joe Cokanasiga9

A strong debut for the Bath man, who did not freeze in the spotlight. His speed and ability to chase kicks and compete in the air was noteworthy, whilst his impressive carrying threat was also on display. He looked comfortable defensively, too, rotating back into the middle when Daly was pulled out of position by Japan, as well as making good defensive reads and executing the one-on-one tackles. His first try for England was created by his own work rate on the chase and skill in the air, winning the ball back for his team.

  1. George Ford6

Far from the masterful display that Ford would have wanted to stake a claim for resuming his role as England’s starting fly-half. The positives included missing just one kick at goal and a nice inside ball for Mark Wilson’s try, but his control on the game was lacking in the first half. He couldn’t quite pull the strings and get England moving offensively until Japan tired and fell out of contention.

  1. Danny Care5

After a bright start, where Care brought tempo and excellent support-running for the first try of the game, the scrum-half fell out of his groove somewhat. His miss-pass from the base of the ruck was read and intercepted by Japan, he mishandled a lineout steal from Charlie Ewels and a missed tackle on Michael Leitch led directly to a Japan try.

  1. Alec Hepburn4

Another quiet performance from Hepburn, who hasn’t been able to translate club form onto the international stage over the last few weeks. England had no set-piece advantage and his characteristic domineering runs for Exeter were not on display at Twickenham.

  1. Jamie George8

George swallowed a yellow card for going off his feet in the ruck, but it was a penalty conceded that arguably saved England from a try. Otherwise, it was a solid showing from the hooker, who linked up well in the loose, including helping to create tries for Care and Cokanasiga, whilst he also made a try-saving tackle on Yu Tamura in the first half.

  1. Harry Williams5

The tighthead looked uncomfortable against Keita Inagaki early on but did manage to fire back later in the first half, forcing a penalty out of the Japanese loosehead. Like Care, he also missed a tackle on Leitch, which saw the back row canter over the try line.

  1. Charlie Ewels7

On a day of England doing the basics on defence badly, Ewels stood out with the understated efficiency of his performance. He tackled strongly and cleanly and provided England with a good second option at the lineout when not calling to Maro Itoje. Popped up with a steal on Japan’s throw, too.

  1. Maro Itoje7

A strong early showing from the lock, who was breaking tackles as a carrier, disrupting the Japanese lineout and getting his hands inside the opposition maul and onto the ball. A couple of individual moments of brilliance, including a steal on the ground when England were under pressure and an athletic lineout take on a poor throw. Came strong in England’s ‘second wave’ at the 60-minute mark.

  1. Courtney Lawes – 6

The lock-turned-blindside started and finished the game strongly, with a sizeable quiet period in the middle of the game. He made some trademark momentum-changing tackles and demonstrated his ability in the wider channels, linking play with soft hands that didn’t exist a couple of seasons ago. Won a crucial breakdown penalty 10 minutes from the end, with Japan pressuring the English try line.

  1. Mark Wilson – 6

Short of the impressive performance he turned in against South Africa. Wilson got on the wrong side of the referee, pinged for being offside at the maul and not rolling away in the opening 15 minutes, as well as gifting Japan an advantage for being offside earlier in the game. He also knocked on early and struggled to have the same positive influence on the game that he had against the Springboks, although his second half try eased English worries.

  1. Zach Mercer5

A quiet performance from the number eight on his first start, who couldn’t make his presence known as his team struggled around him. He had a couple of noteworthy moments on the gain-line, either evading the tackle and getting England moving forward, or showing soft hands to bring in players inside or outside him.

 

Replacements

 

  1. Dylan Hartley6

Connected with an early lineout when George was sinbinned, as well as one to club teammate Lawes in the second half that he was able to drive over the try line from the maul.

  1. Ben Moon7

Just as he did coming off the bench against South Africa, Moon significantly bolstered the English scrum. England went from set-piece inconsistency to set-piece dominance once he and Kyle Sinckler arrived.

  1. Kyle Sinckler7

The tighthead brought real impact off the bench, both running hard and straight at the Japanese defensive line and acting as a playmaker on the gain-line, shifting the ball on with good hands.

  1. Ted Hill6

Came on late for his debut but didn’t have an opportunity to influence the game.

  1. Sam Underhill6

Put himself about defensively after coming on, bringing much-needed efficiency wrapping players up in the tackle. Grabbed a late turnover to cap his display.

  1. Richard Wigglesworth6

Clinical cameo from Wigglesworth, who showed good awareness to send Cokanasiga over for his first international try.

  1. Owen Farrell8

Sizeable impact from the bench, bringing leadership and communication in the defensive line, a better link to the outside channels on offence and a number of examples of good hands and clever kicks creating space for England.

  1. Henry Slade6

Had a nice break late that was unlucky not to lead to more and tracked back well defensively, saving England’s blushes on one particularly dangerous Japanese attack.

Watch: England scrum-half Danny Care speaks to RugbyPass.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 40 | The Steven Kitshoff Special

O2 Inside Line: All In | Episode 6 | Le Crunch

The Unexpected Journey to USA 7s Glory | Aaron Cummings | Sevens Wonders

USA vs Japan | Full Match Replay

Yokohama Canon Eagles vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Confidence knocks and finding your people | Flo Williams | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Tackling reasons for drop-out in sport | Zainab Alema | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 1 hour ago
Why ‘the curse of the Bambino’ is still stronger than ever at Leinster

A first half of defensive failures is a problem, but they rectified that after half time. That left them with a points-difference mountain to climb. They actually did it, and spent minutes at the end of the game three points adrift, with possession, and on the opposition goal line. They had an extra player. And they also had a penalty right there.


Forget anything else that happened in the game … top teams convert that. They rise to the moment, reduce errors, maintain discipline, increase their energy, and sharpen their focus for those moments that matter. And the question for fans is simply one of why their team could not do this, patiently and accurately retaining possession while creating a scoring opportunity.


Different teams would have done different things with that penalty. A dominant scrumming team might have called the scrum, a successful mauling team might have gone for the lineout, a team with a rock star kicker and a sense of late game superiority might have taken the kick for goal, and a another team might have set a Rassie-esque midfield maul to allow an easy dropped goal. You pick what you have confidence in.


So Leinster picking the tap is not wrong, as long as that is a banker play for them. But don’t pick an option involving forwards smashing into gainline tackles if you have less than 100% confidence in your ball retention.


In the end it all came down to whether Leinster could convert that penalty to points. The stage was set, they held all the cards, and it was time for the killer blow (to mix a few metaphors). This is when giants impose themselves.


The coaching team need to stare at those few minutes of tape 1,000 times, and ask themselves why the team could not land that winning blow. Its not about selections, or replacements, or refereeing, or skillsets, or technique. It is a question of attitude and Big Match Temperament. It’s about imposing your will. Why was it not in evidence?

5 Go to comments
W
Werner 1 hour ago
URC teams aren't proving Stephen Donald wrong

Mate, you're the one that brought up financials saying they have to run a 12 month season to make ends meet. If they were in the SRP they would be struggling more financially. If you think financials don't have an impact a teams competitiveness I would argue different. More money means more capacity to retain and develop talent, to develop rugby pathways and most importantly keep the lights on during the ebb years.


Secondly if we are calling SRP and URC a domestic comp I feel like we're colouring well outside the lines. But if we are drawing parallels to SRP and URC “domestic” comps and you're question of dominance I'd point out that SA have had 3 teams in each quarter final since they joined and either won or been a runner up to the tournament every year. Hardly flunking it. As far as fanbase, you can use viewership, subscriptions or bums on seats and CC is still ahead on the fanbase vs SRP, the benefit of a rugby nation with double the population of AU.

Other than financials the benefits of URC are also as you mentioned more games but also more teams and players getting exposure to professional rugby (it's actually 5 teams if you include the repechage of the SA teams). With the schedules and competition setup all URC teams are required to have enough players to field 2-3 teams across the season. Previously under the SR you had 5 teams being forced into 4 squads with minimal change between squads week in week out.


See the thing about the SR or URC being better for competitiveness falls over pretty quick when you understand its a too way street. Arguing that SA is better or worse off because they left the SRP implies that AU and NZ aren't impacted and that they some how stay sharp without outside competition. All teams are worse off in the regard that they are no longer exposed to the different playing styles But When you consider RWC I would argue that being in the URC is a benefit to SA because they are far more likely to face a European team in the pool stages than AU or NZ.

43 Go to comments
S
SK 2 hours ago
Why ‘the curse of the Bambino’ is still stronger than ever at Leinster

Well Nick I have a theory why Leinster seem to lose so often at this stage of the season and it has to do with the Six Nations and what happens after that. In all of the seasons Leinster have come up short they have dominated going into the 6N. Then after that with Irish players coming out of camp they have some breathing space in the URC so they rest the lads. The SA tour almost always follows between week 12-16 of the URC. Leinster send weakened teams and have lost all games but one against the Sharks this year. They invariably ship one more in the URC regular season to an Ulster or a Munster and this year it was the Scarlets. They usually do so when starting weakened sides or teams that are half baked with a few of their internationals and their bench strength in what can be described as some kind of odd trail mix. The 6N takes its toll. The Irish lads come back battered and some come back injured. They also spend time in Irelands camp training within Irish systems with the coaches and these are slightly different to what they do at Leinster and in the last 2 seasons have been massively different on D. In the last 4-6 weeks of the URC the boys coming back from the Irish camp are not featuring. They are managed either side of the knockouts in the Champions cup. They sometimes play just 3-5 games over a 10 week period. They go from being battered and bruised to being underdone and out of whack. They lose all momentum with the losses they accrue and doubts start to set in. Suddenly sides find ways to unlock them, they make mistakes and they just cant deal with the pressure. At this time the weather also turns from cold, wet and rancid to bright and sunny. Suddenly the tempo is lifted on fields and conditions that are great for attractive rugby. Leinster start to concede points and dont put in the shift they used to. They have no momentum to do so. When will the coaching staff realise that they need to do something different at this point? They keep trying to manage the players and their systems in the same way every season when the boys come back from Ireland duty and its always the same result. A disaster in the last 3-4 weeks of the season. This year it came earlier. Maybe thats a blessing. With 2 rounds left in the URC they can focus their attentions. Perhaps thats where Leinsters attention needs to be anyway. They need to reclaim their bread and butter competition title before pushing onto the next star.

5 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why ‘the curse of the Bambino’ is still stronger than ever at Leinster Why ‘the curse of the Bambino’ is still stronger than ever at Leinster
Search