Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England player ratings vs South Africa | Autumn Nations Series

(Photo by Paul Harding/Getty Images)

England player ratings live from Twickenham: A deja vu scenario, but with quite a damaging outcome for England on this occasion. Seven days earlier, they were 6-25 down to the All Blacks with eight minutes remaining when they launched a game-levelling three-try comeback with the opposition a yellow card man down.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here, the deficit was 6-27 with 20 minutes remaining when Springboks sub Thomas du Toit was rightly red-carded for his shoulder horribly meeting the head of fellow replacement Luke Cowan-Dickie, but there was no miraculous revival. Marcus Smith was soon to exit injured and bar a Henry Slade converted try, that was the height of this weekend’s England riposte in a brutal 13-27 loss.

For the deeply wounded England, it will be marked down as a disaster. They badly needed a win so that they could sign off on this November series – and on the entire 2022 calendar year – in the black. They had come into the fixture with only a 50 per cent success rate: eleven games played, five won, five lost and one drawn. Not the type of dominance designed to have people believing they will be world champions in eleven months’ time.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

A curiosity was how the more things supposedly change for England under Eddie Jones, the more things actually stay the same as this latest rejigged XV contained five Saracens players, three of whom were out of favour this time last year but have since fought their way back in. It meant that the home side started with nine of the exact same team that had run out to begin the loss to the Springboks three years ago in the World Cup final.

Not that there was a wholesale South African evolution in the 36 months since Yokohama. They had eight of the very same world final starters on deck again here and once their fans had managed to negotiate the train congestion, the braai queues, and the latest tweets from the banned Rassie Erasmus, it was low-frills actions stations.

Related

The first half-hour became the story of intense scrums, multiple penalty kicks despite the blustery wind, a whole heap of momentum-stopping collisions and far too many unnecessary water breaks. It left the scoreboard stuck at three-all, Owen Farrell one from three and Faf de Klerk one from two, before a Damien Willemse drop goal became the cue for South Africa to clinically counterattack.

There was England angst that Freddie Steward was perhaps obstructed Kurt-Lee Arendse as he chased down the ball-catching Willemse on the SA 22-metre line and there were also howls that a pass from le Roux was potentially forward, but the groans were immaterial as the 33rd-minute Arendse try stood and de Klerk tacked on a penalty on the blow of the half for a handsome 14-3 advantage.

ADVERTISEMENT

For England, it was a ‘marginal improvement’ on last weekend, as they trailed the All Blacks 3-17 at the break and although Jones reacted by making four half-time changes, whipping off the front row and a winger, it soon all went to pot, Farrell’s penalty sandwiched by a second Willemse drop goal and a converted Eben Etzebeth try with Tom Curry on a yellow card.

A long-range de Klerk penalty followed for 6-27 before England were offered a 20-minute lifeline with du Toit sent packing. It wasn’t grasped though, 14 points the eventual margin of defeat due to Farrell and co being far too frantic in trying to exploit their man advantage and the final whistle was greeted with deserved boos from the home support for a withering, deflating performance. Here are the physically beaten-up England player ratings:

15. Freddie Steward – 5.5
Endured an uncharacteristic first half that featured a rare knock on under dropping ball and also a clearance kick out on the full. Had grounds for complaint after how the opening South African try ignited. Was better in the second half but remain way below his usual high standard

14. Tommy Freeman – 4.5
A surprise inclusion for his third-ever Test start despite last weekend’s general lack of involvement by Jack Nowell, he too struggle for action, a 27th-minute knock on about the height of his very limited first half. Hooked at the break for Nowell.

ADVERTISEMENT

13. Manu Tuilagi – 5
A picture of rude health this November in contrast to his frustrating pattern of injury, his 50th England cap wasn’t the memorable one he would have hoped for as he wasn’t much noticed. Needed a penalty-winning carry near his own line with time almost up to remind people he was still out there.

12. Owen Farrell – 6.5
Having given up the kicking duties last weekend with an ankle injury, he was back on the job here and it went terribly wrong in the opening period with two misses from three attempts. Also sent a one-handed tip-on to Tuilagi forward. Tried to lead the charge against 14 with Smith off injured, his break leading to the Slade try, but there was far too much to be done.

11. Jonny May – 4
Needed a much-improved performance and he didn’t get it as he was again a largely anonymous figure part from tidying up one chase to the dead ball line with Eben Etzebeth.

10. Marcus Smith – 5.5
Gave a Harlequins-esque flourish to transform last week’s 6-25 deficit into a draw and needed to do the same here with England two points worse off but he was gone injured on 61 minutes, unable to shake off the ankle role sustained earlier when tackled by Siya Kolisi. Sent up regular aerial bombs in the first half, but only one catching error resulted. Show loved skill scampering back to tidy on 28 minutes after a Makazole Mapimpi kick ahead, but he was stepped neatly by Arendse for the game-breaking try.

9. Jack van Poortvliet – 6
Selection here meant he started more games than Ben Youngs this November but he had it rough behind a pack constantly under the cosh. Gone on 67 minutes.

1. Mako Vunipola – 5
Was brilliantly defiant when used as a sub against the All Blacks, but he couldn’t supply the same energy here as a starter. Mixed effort at the scrum, a concession resulting in a de Klerk miss before a penalty back was missed by Farrell. Featured little elsewhere and was off at the break.

2. Jamie George – 5.5
Another upgraded from the bench to start on the basis of what he did last weekend, another who didn’t have the same joy shouldering that responsibility. There was one show of good leadership, asking the referee to clarify what was going on at the scrum against his team, but was otherwise of little influence.

3. Kyle Sinckler – 5.5
Trouble started when he didn’t take the hit at the first scrum and had it tough all the way through after that until swapped for Will Stuart at the break. Back for the last four minutes after his replacement was injured.

4. Maro Itoje – 7
Started with a whirlwind, an early rip, penalty-winning pressure at a restart and a wicked one-handed pass out the back showing he was up for this. Got more than he bargained for early in the second half when he nuisance leg-hold on Etzebeth – while Willemse dropped a goal – sparked an all-in. Won a turnover penalty that gave England hope after the red card but there were generally too many South African forwards watching over him.

5. Jonny Hill – 6.5
Underlined his importance to the current England set-up in being one of seven players to start all games, he began promisingly before getting overwhelmed despite his best efforts.

6. Alex Coles – 5.5
A big call stitching the Test rookie back into the mix after an all-sorts month when there was a start at lock, a run off the bench and then match day exclusion last weekend. His adventure here was curtailed after only 46 minutes, his penalty trouble the main talking point with an obvious neck roll on Evan Roos and then collapsing a maul with South Africa just metres out. His tackle count was high, mind.

7. Tom Curry – 7
The best of the English back rows, he was left with too much to do. Gave up the penalty that allowed de Klerk made it 3-14 and was then yellow carded after the break, his absence getting followed by a ten-point South African burst. Finished as his team’s tackler yet again, despite his ten-minute absence.

8. Billy Vunipola – 6
Accidently crashing into the referee off the back of an early scrum and alter giving Roos a shove with the ball in touch were some of his less notable contributions on a difficult evening when the traffic was ruck-hour like whenever he carried for hos 50-or-so metres. Off on 56 minutes for Sam Simmonds.

Replacements:
16. Luke Cowan-Dickie – 5.5
Having looked lethargic this month as a starter, it was no surprise to see him benched for this. Arrived after half-time and his big moment was being on the receiving end of the rec-carded du Toit charge. The question must be asked why didn’t he need to go for a HIA?

17. Ellis Genge – 6
Should have been furious he was axed from the XV as he has been one of the most improved players this past twelve months. Struggled to change the flow of the scrum but carried hard.

18. Will Stuart – 5.5
Last week’s two-try hero, there was no fairy tale on this occasion as he excited in pain with a worrying injury.

19. David Ribbans – 5.5
Sent on for Coles just six minutes after the break to play against his native country. Beaten at the jump on 61 after England had kicked the red card penalty to touch.

20. Sam Simmonds – 5
It’s said he struggles with the power game and it showed here when he was unable to free up Malcolm Marx over the ball.

21. Ben Youngs – 5
Credited with bringing a game-changing tempo to the closing exchanges versus the Kiwis, but couldn’t do likewise here.

22. Henry Slade – 7
Usually a regular starter, he has used this month’s repositioning as a bench player and he played excellently. Scored the lone England try on 72 minutes. Really needs to be considered as a starter.

23. Jack Nowell – 6.5
Paid the selection price for last weekend’s All Blacks encounter passing him, he played the full second half. Done for a holding-on penalty but he was encouraging in the carry. His team’s second-best sub after clubmate Slade.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
M
Michael 752 days ago

Common on - its a repeat of RWC19 - England beat the ABs and then go on and get dismantled by the Boks. OK technically this time they didnt beat the ABs, but let's face it they treated it as a win

K
Kenward K. 753 days ago

You can't polish a turd, generally.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 19 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Like I've said before about your idea (actually it might have been something to do with mine, I can't remember), I like that teams will a small sustainable league focus can gain the reward of more consistent CC involvement. I'd really like the most consistent option available.


Thing is, I think rugby can do better than footballs version. I think for instance I wanted everyone in it to think they can win it, where you're talking about the worst teams not giving up because they are so far off the pace we get really bad scoreline when that and giving up to concentrate on the league is happening together.


So I really like that you could have a way to remedy that, but personally I would want my model to not need that crutch. Some of this is the same problem that football has. I really like the landscape in both the URC and Prem, but Ireland with Leinster specifically, and France, are a problem IMO. In football this has turned CL pool stages in to simply cash cow fixtures for the also ran countries teams who just want to have a Real Madrid or ManC to lose to in their pool for that bumper revenue hit. It's always been a comp that had suffered for real interest until the knockouts as well (they might have changed it in recent years?).


You've got some great principles but I'm not sure it's going to deliver on that hard hitting impact right from the start without the best teams playing in it. I think you might need to think about the most minimal requirement/way/performance, a team needs to execute to stay in the Champions Cup as I was having some thougt about that earlier and had some theory I can't remember. First they could get entry by being a losing quarter finalist in the challenge, then putting all their eggs in the Champions pool play bucket in order to never finish last in their pool, all the while showing the same indifference to their league some show to EPCR rugby now, just to remain in champions. You extrapolate that out and is there ever likely to be more change to the champions cup that the bottom four sides rotate out each year for the 4 challenge teams? Are the leagues ever likely to have the sort of 'flux' required to see some variation? Even a good one like Englands.


I'd love to have a table at hand were you can see all the outcomes, and know how likely any of your top 12 teams are going break into Champions rubyg on th back it it are?

120 Go to comments
f
fl 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

120 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ ‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’ ‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’
Search