Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England player ratings vs South Africa | Autumn Nations Series

(Photo by Paul Harding/Getty Images)

England player ratings live from Twickenham: A deja vu scenario, but with quite a damaging outcome for England on this occasion. Seven days earlier, they were 6-25 down to the All Blacks with eight minutes remaining when they launched a game-levelling three-try comeback with the opposition a yellow card man down.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here, the deficit was 6-27 with 20 minutes remaining when Springboks sub Thomas du Toit was rightly red-carded for his shoulder horribly meeting the head of fellow replacement Luke Cowan-Dickie, but there was no miraculous revival. Marcus Smith was soon to exit injured and bar a Henry Slade converted try, that was the height of this weekend’s England riposte in a brutal 13-27 loss.

For the deeply wounded England, it will be marked down as a disaster. They badly needed a win so that they could sign off on this November series – and on the entire 2022 calendar year – in the black. They had come into the fixture with only a 50 per cent success rate: eleven games played, five won, five lost and one drawn. Not the type of dominance designed to have people believing they will be world champions in eleven months’ time.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

A curiosity was how the more things supposedly change for England under Eddie Jones, the more things actually stay the same as this latest rejigged XV contained five Saracens players, three of whom were out of favour this time last year but have since fought their way back in. It meant that the home side started with nine of the exact same team that had run out to begin the loss to the Springboks three years ago in the World Cup final.

Not that there was a wholesale South African evolution in the 36 months since Yokohama. They had eight of the very same world final starters on deck again here and once their fans had managed to negotiate the train congestion, the braai queues, and the latest tweets from the banned Rassie Erasmus, it was low-frills actions stations.

Related

The first half-hour became the story of intense scrums, multiple penalty kicks despite the blustery wind, a whole heap of momentum-stopping collisions and far too many unnecessary water breaks. It left the scoreboard stuck at three-all, Owen Farrell one from three and Faf de Klerk one from two, before a Damien Willemse drop goal became the cue for South Africa to clinically counterattack.

There was England angst that Freddie Steward was perhaps obstructed Kurt-Lee Arendse as he chased down the ball-catching Willemse on the SA 22-metre line and there were also howls that a pass from le Roux was potentially forward, but the groans were immaterial as the 33rd-minute Arendse try stood and de Klerk tacked on a penalty on the blow of the half for a handsome 14-3 advantage.

ADVERTISEMENT

For England, it was a ‘marginal improvement’ on last weekend, as they trailed the All Blacks 3-17 at the break and although Jones reacted by making four half-time changes, whipping off the front row and a winger, it soon all went to pot, Farrell’s penalty sandwiched by a second Willemse drop goal and a converted Eben Etzebeth try with Tom Curry on a yellow card.

A long-range de Klerk penalty followed for 6-27 before England were offered a 20-minute lifeline with du Toit sent packing. It wasn’t grasped though, 14 points the eventual margin of defeat due to Farrell and co being far too frantic in trying to exploit their man advantage and the final whistle was greeted with deserved boos from the home support for a withering, deflating performance. Here are the physically beaten-up England player ratings:

15. Freddie Steward – 5.5
Endured an uncharacteristic first half that featured a rare knock on under dropping ball and also a clearance kick out on the full. Had grounds for complaint after how the opening South African try ignited. Was better in the second half but remain way below his usual high standard

14. Tommy Freeman – 4.5
A surprise inclusion for his third-ever Test start despite last weekend’s general lack of involvement by Jack Nowell, he too struggle for action, a 27th-minute knock on about the height of his very limited first half. Hooked at the break for Nowell.

ADVERTISEMENT

13. Manu Tuilagi – 5
A picture of rude health this November in contrast to his frustrating pattern of injury, his 50th England cap wasn’t the memorable one he would have hoped for as he wasn’t much noticed. Needed a penalty-winning carry near his own line with time almost up to remind people he was still out there.

12. Owen Farrell – 6.5
Having given up the kicking duties last weekend with an ankle injury, he was back on the job here and it went terribly wrong in the opening period with two misses from three attempts. Also sent a one-handed tip-on to Tuilagi forward. Tried to lead the charge against 14 with Smith off injured, his break leading to the Slade try, but there was far too much to be done.

11. Jonny May – 4
Needed a much-improved performance and he didn’t get it as he was again a largely anonymous figure part from tidying up one chase to the dead ball line with Eben Etzebeth.

10. Marcus Smith – 5.5
Gave a Harlequins-esque flourish to transform last week’s 6-25 deficit into a draw and needed to do the same here with England two points worse off but he was gone injured on 61 minutes, unable to shake off the ankle role sustained earlier when tackled by Siya Kolisi. Sent up regular aerial bombs in the first half, but only one catching error resulted. Show loved skill scampering back to tidy on 28 minutes after a Makazole Mapimpi kick ahead, but he was stepped neatly by Arendse for the game-breaking try.

9. Jack van Poortvliet – 6
Selection here meant he started more games than Ben Youngs this November but he had it rough behind a pack constantly under the cosh. Gone on 67 minutes.

1. Mako Vunipola – 5
Was brilliantly defiant when used as a sub against the All Blacks, but he couldn’t supply the same energy here as a starter. Mixed effort at the scrum, a concession resulting in a de Klerk miss before a penalty back was missed by Farrell. Featured little elsewhere and was off at the break.

2. Jamie George – 5.5
Another upgraded from the bench to start on the basis of what he did last weekend, another who didn’t have the same joy shouldering that responsibility. There was one show of good leadership, asking the referee to clarify what was going on at the scrum against his team, but was otherwise of little influence.

3. Kyle Sinckler – 5.5
Trouble started when he didn’t take the hit at the first scrum and had it tough all the way through after that until swapped for Will Stuart at the break. Back for the last four minutes after his replacement was injured.

4. Maro Itoje – 7
Started with a whirlwind, an early rip, penalty-winning pressure at a restart and a wicked one-handed pass out the back showing he was up for this. Got more than he bargained for early in the second half when he nuisance leg-hold on Etzebeth – while Willemse dropped a goal – sparked an all-in. Won a turnover penalty that gave England hope after the red card but there were generally too many South African forwards watching over him.

5. Jonny Hill – 6.5
Underlined his importance to the current England set-up in being one of seven players to start all games, he began promisingly before getting overwhelmed despite his best efforts.

6. Alex Coles – 5.5
A big call stitching the Test rookie back into the mix after an all-sorts month when there was a start at lock, a run off the bench and then match day exclusion last weekend. His adventure here was curtailed after only 46 minutes, his penalty trouble the main talking point with an obvious neck roll on Evan Roos and then collapsing a maul with South Africa just metres out. His tackle count was high, mind.

7. Tom Curry – 7
The best of the English back rows, he was left with too much to do. Gave up the penalty that allowed de Klerk made it 3-14 and was then yellow carded after the break, his absence getting followed by a ten-point South African burst. Finished as his team’s tackler yet again, despite his ten-minute absence.

8. Billy Vunipola – 6
Accidently crashing into the referee off the back of an early scrum and alter giving Roos a shove with the ball in touch were some of his less notable contributions on a difficult evening when the traffic was ruck-hour like whenever he carried for hos 50-or-so metres. Off on 56 minutes for Sam Simmonds.

Replacements:
16. Luke Cowan-Dickie – 5.5
Having looked lethargic this month as a starter, it was no surprise to see him benched for this. Arrived after half-time and his big moment was being on the receiving end of the rec-carded du Toit charge. The question must be asked why didn’t he need to go for a HIA?

17. Ellis Genge – 6
Should have been furious he was axed from the XV as he has been one of the most improved players this past twelve months. Struggled to change the flow of the scrum but carried hard.

18. Will Stuart – 5.5
Last week’s two-try hero, there was no fairy tale on this occasion as he excited in pain with a worrying injury.

19. David Ribbans – 5.5
Sent on for Coles just six minutes after the break to play against his native country. Beaten at the jump on 61 after England had kicked the red card penalty to touch.

20. Sam Simmonds – 5
It’s said he struggles with the power game and it showed here when he was unable to free up Malcolm Marx over the ball.

21. Ben Youngs – 5
Credited with bringing a game-changing tempo to the closing exchanges versus the Kiwis, but couldn’t do likewise here.

22. Henry Slade – 7
Usually a regular starter, he has used this month’s repositioning as a bench player and he played excellently. Scored the lone England try on 72 minutes. Really needs to be considered as a starter.

23. Jack Nowell – 6.5
Paid the selection price for last weekend’s All Blacks encounter passing him, he played the full second half. Done for a holding-on penalty but he was encouraging in the carry. His team’s second-best sub after clubmate Slade.

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
M
Michael 844 days ago

Common on - its a repeat of RWC19 - England beat the ABs and then go on and get dismantled by the Boks. OK technically this time they didnt beat the ABs, but let's face it they treated it as a win

K
Kenward K. 845 days ago

You can't polish a turd, generally.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

C
Carmen Beechum 12 minutes ago
Mick Cleary: 'England are back among the heavyweights.'

(Telegram: https:// t. me/Pro_ Wizard_ Gilbert_ Recovery)Email (pro wizard gilbert recovery (@) engineer. com)I never imagined I would fall victim to a cryptocurrency scam, but that's exactly what happened. My name is [Carmen Beechum, and I invested $500,000 into what | believed was a legitimate trading platform. Everything appeared professional-the website was well-designed, customer service was responsive, and my trading account even showed promising returns.It all seemed too good to be false.However, when I attempted to withdraw my funds, I was met with endless delays and excuses. First, they claimed there were technical issues, then they needed additional verification, and finally, they requested a release fee before processing my withdrawal. Despite complying with their demands, my account was eventually frozen, and all communication from the platform ceased. That's when reality hit me—l had been scammed out of half a million dollars. Desperate to find a way to recover my money, I searched online for solutions. That's when I came across PRO WIZARD GIlBERT RECOVERY, a company dedicated to helping victims of online financial fraud. At first, I was skeptical-after all, I had already been deceived once, and the last thing I wanted was to fall for another scam. But after speaking with their team and reviewing their success stories, I decided to take a chance.Their experts immediately got to work, using advanced blockchain forensics and investigative tools to trace my stolen funds. WhatsApp: +1 (920) 408‑1234They identified the fraudulent wallets where my money had been transferred and collaborated with financial institutions and law enforcement agencies to take action. Thanks to their persistence and expertise, they were able to freeze the scammers' accounts and successfully recover my $500,000. What seemed like a devastating loss turned into a remarkable recovery. I am incredibly grateful to PRO WIZARD GIlBERT RECOVERY for not only retrieving my funds but also restoring my peace of mind. My experience serves as a warning to others-always be cautious with online investments, but if you ever become a victim, know that recovery is possible with the right experts on your side.

15 Go to comments
J
JW 32 minutes ago
Five reasons why Super Rugby Pacific is enjoying it's best season in forever

The Mickey Mouse playoff system that made the entire regular season redundant

The playoff system has never been redundant Ben, it was merely important to fewer teams, just those vying for top seed. After that it was simply about qualifying.


The format is arguably worse now. I can see the Canes slumping to a point were the return of key components, like their starting midfield, is now going to happen too late for them due to the reduced playoff spots. So we don’t get the perfect jeopardy like what we got with the Crusaders last year, were deservedly (despite showing they easily had a top 4 team when fit) they missed out because they were even more pathetic than that early team deserved. A couple more bonus points with some better leadership, on and off field, would have given the Crusaders a deserving. As reported last year have we not seen a more perfect finals run in.


Objectively easier finals qualification is better suited to shorter competitions, and we know SR is the “sprint” version amongst it’s rugby equivalents. The Top 14 is probably the worst competition in this respect, with it’s length with a double round robin should have a football styled champion. The Premiership, with it’s smaller base but also double round robin, was pretty much perfectly suited to it’s smaller 4 team playoff. Super Rugby, with it’s much shorter season (smaller amount of games, and most importantly over a much shorter period, would be able suited to a 6 team play off series if it had a comparative round robin. It doesn’t. Playing a bunch of random extra games, within your own division, requires you to expand the qualification reach. Super Rugby was another perfectly balanced competition.


If you want to look subjectively, sure, there are a lot of cool facets of tighter qualification, they just aren’t sensible applicable to SR so you have to be a realist.


I’m pretty sure you yourself have authored articles showing you need to be in the top four come finals time to win Super Rugby.

Competition parity this year just seems to be part luck, but we’ll take it.

The closer parity is simply more about circumstance, I agree. The Lions tour has just as much to do with the consistency and early standards in Australian players performances, and random factors balancing the NZ sides. The predictable improvement of the “Pacific Powers” another key factor, but with the case of extra support like NZR help raise their profile, as in the “Ardie” factor, possibly able to happen a year sooner than it has.


Still, as I have highlighted on previous articles, I wouldn’t be surprised if these results were nearly as predictable as they were last year, and that it was just the fixture ‘creation’ by new management that has artificially created a bit more hype and unrealistic perception on the competitions ‘parity’, in these early stages.

Super Rugby Pacific has done the right thing and got rid of most TMO interventions that have plagued the game over the last few years and impacted one World Cup final.

I wouldn’t have minded if they just put their own spin on WR’s structure. While you don’t go on to describe what the two situations are that remain, one that I think could still have been of value keeping is for the ability for the TMO to rule live.


The fact that several of the WC’s TMO officials were overly zealous in their ability to over rule the onfield decision does not mean there wouldn’t have been value in a good southern hemisphere run contingent from simply adding value and support to the game ref. Take the case last weekend as the perfect example. While I don’t believe it would have been of any real benefit for the Highlanders to have had advantage at the death (the same sequence would have still played out), looking in isolation one can clearly tell that was a live situation where the ref said he was obstructed from making a call, and if the current rules would have allowed, the TMO, like us on TV, could easily have told him to play advantage for the infringement. In another situation that type of officiating could have made all the difference to the quality and accuracy of the outcome. Views of the comp would be a lot different if it was clearly as case that the Highlanders were robbed of a deserved victory.


All told, the game is obviously much better off for what changes have been made with officiating, though this is not really isolated to SR. SR is just the only comp to have start with these.

If you want back in, put your hands up for some real competition, don’t ask for handouts. No conference systems.

We are currently in a conference system Ben, I’m afraid you’re beating the wrong drum there and you own subjective (and flawed) opinions are coming through quite clearly. As spitballed on the article a few days ago, it’s hard to see a true league table where it is either a full round robin or double round robin happen, there is still going to be some amount of divisional derby matchs going on to fill out the season.


Conferences are also the only way forward, so get on board. I would love for SARU to be able to add a couple of regional sides in Super Rugby, using the countries burgeoning playerbase. It might be far easier, and more advantageous, for SA to add to SR than say try to enlarge the URC, or go it on their own with a professional scene. They could leave their clubs to themselves and take control of running a highveld team out of Cheetahs country, and a lowveld team wherever they would like a new attempt at a ‘Kings’ team. I can’t see the clubs ever rejoining SR.


Not surprised the article is well off the mark Ben.


One thing they could do to further improve the ‘jeopardy’ though is to have a separate world club table where each seasons finalists are awarding ranking points going towards selecting who takes part in the biennial (right?) world champs the Champions Cup is hosting in the future. I’d normally expect the government to simply send whoever the most recent finalists are but I reckon creating a way to have those instead be judged by contribution since the last edition (however frequent this idea might turn out) could be a winner this new management will work out and capitalize on. It would also help add to that jeopardy if say ranking points were only allocated to the top 6 of an 8 team finals format.

2 Go to comments
C
Carmen Beechum 1 hour ago
Jettisoning your best attacking player makes no sense – Andy Goode

(Telegram: https:// t. me/Pro_ Wizard_ Gilbert_ Recovery)Email (pro wizard gilbert recovery (@) engineer. com)I never imagined I would fall victim to a cryptocurrency scam, but that's exactly what happened. My name is [Carmen Beechum, and I invested $500,000 into what | believed was a legitimate trading platform. Everything appeared professional-the website was well-designed, customer service was responsive, and my trading account even showed promising returns.It all seemed too good to be false.However, when I attempted to withdraw my funds, I was met with endless delays and excuses. First, they claimed there were technical issues, then they needed additional verification, and finally, they requested a release fee before processing my withdrawal. Despite complying with their demands, my account was eventually frozen, and all communication from the platform ceased. That's when reality hit me—l had been scammed out of half a million dollars. Desperate to find a way to recover my money, I searched online for solutions. That's when I came across PRO WIZARD GIlBERT RECOVERY, a company dedicated to helping victims of online financial fraud. At first, I was skeptical-after all, I had already been deceived once, and the last thing I wanted was to fall for another scam. But after speaking with their team and reviewing their success stories, I decided to take a chance.Their experts immediately got to work, using advanced blockchain forensics and investigative tools to trace my stolen funds. WhatsApp: +1 (920) 408‑1234They identified the fraudulent wallets where my money had been transferred and collaborated with financial institutions and law enforcement agencies to take action. Thanks to their persistence and expertise, they were able to freeze the scammers' accounts and successfully recover my $500,000. What seemed like a devastating loss turned into a remarkable recovery. I am incredibly grateful to PRO WIZARD GIlBERT RECOVERY for not only retrieving my funds but also restoring my peace of mind. My experience serves as a warning to others-always be cautious with online investments, but if you ever become a victim, know that recovery is possible with the right experts on your side.

26 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING New setback all but ends Immanuel Feyi-Waboso's Lions hopes New setback all but ends Immanuel Feyi-Waboso's Lions hopes
Search