1
England player ratings vs South Africa | Rugby World Cup 2023
By Liam Heagney
England player ratings live from Stade de France: This was the moment of real truth for Steve Borthwick’s England. He had lived up to his promise that he would have his underwhelming team ready for the tournament start on September 9, Argentina getting squeezed 27-10 despite Tom Curry’s third-minute red card.
ADVERTISEMENT
From there, England progressed through the easier side of the draw, winning four more games to secure their semi-final qualification.
However, as witnessed on Friday night when the Pumas were mauled 44-6 by the All Blacks, the fear was that two levels of competition had unfolded at France 2023 and that the English would similarly chewed up and spat aside. Not so.
Video Player is loading.
Try-less England were absolutely wonderful here, dominating the kicking battle in the wet conditions and tackling for their lives.
That attitude had them leading for a whopping 75 minutes of a tense, intriguing, edge-of-seat contest before getting cruelly overtaken when Handre Pollard’s long-range penalty edged the defending champions 16-15 in front to win.
What gave? The loss of the excellently defiant Tom Curry with his team 15-6 clear and just 11 minutes remaining. When play restarted, South Africa pounced for the converted RG Snyman try that set up the grandstand finish that the infringing English scrum couldn’t withstand. Here are the England player ratings:
15. Freddie Steward – 8
Recalled to help defuse the Springboks’ kicking game, he was safe hands personified in the wet conditions and it was his pressure chasing a Farrell kick that forced the spill which helped England get 9-3 up.
ADVERTISEMENT
14. Jonny May – 6.5
His involvements were few and far between but eventually contributed when his chase of a kick near the interval was impeded by Pieter-Steph du Toit, handing Owen Farrell his kick for a 12-6 lead. Couldn’t prevent the grounding of the 69th-minute try and was subbed off for George Ford when play restarted.
13. Joe Marchant – 6.5
Knocked on under the Farrell kick-off and that was about it for his first half as a brutally narrow game simply didn’t unfold down his channel. It was a similar enough story in the second period and it was his misfortunate not to get enough sight of the ball to stop Snyman from scoring the try that set up a dramatic finish.
12. Manu Tuilagi – 7
Had only slightly more first-half action than Marchant but it was still very limited. Blamed for the tangle with Cobus Reinach that set off a 15th-minute dust-up. Carried well the couple of times he was invited onto the ball. Missed the end-game, though, as subbed on 74 minutes.
11. Elliot Daly – 7
Tasted more action than May on the other flank, it was his tapback of aerial ball that was critical in the lead-up to the opening England penalty. Continued in a similar manner after the break, his chase winning England a five-metre throw after a Farrell grubber.
ADVERTISEMENT
10. Owen Farrell – 8
Nailed his four first-half kicks off the tee to give England a sniff of an upset, but wasn’t faultless as unnecessary verbals to referee Ben O’Keeffe cost 10 metres and put Libbok in range to kick the first South African points. Got his head back on the game after the interval, executing an excellent drop goal on 53 minutes and keeping his team on the front front.
9. Alex Mitchell – 7
Started sprightly, with good ruck surveillance helping to win England their opening penalty and he followed it with a smart touch finder. Illustrated how much he has grown since his early August call-up, often calling in an extra guard to the ruck before kicking clear. On the debit side, it was his ruck infringement that gave South Africa the penalty which sparked the Farrell verbals while he also missed a number of tackles. Gone on 53.
1. Joe Marler – 8
A rare recent stat for the veteran loosehead, he was excellent when you overlooked the couple of first-half penalties he gave up. Carried regularly with England seeking added yards to make good exits. A nuggety competitor who didn’t tolerate any Springboks nonsense. Excellent 53 minutes.
2. Jamie George – 7.5
Defiant the whole way through but can’t be pleased with some of his second-half throwing and scrummaging. The most costly moment was the crooked throw on 44 minutes with England just five metres out from the line.
3. Dan Cole – 8
Rolled back the years with a fabulous 56-minute demonstration of old-school tighthead prop play, clearing out breakdowns and minding his set-piece. Won a scrum penalty on 17 minutes and had the energy to punch the air when Farrell’s drop goal put England nine points clear 13 minutes into the second half.
4. Maro Itoje – 9
Welcome back to the Maro Itoje of 2017 British and Irish Lions frame. He was brilliantly effective in igniting English momentum, stealing the first opposition lineout, being a nuisance at the maul, and going after the ball in the contact.
5. George Martin – 8
What a story. Just a four-ever Test start for the 22-year-old, he was brilliant in his 53-minute involvement. Large presence at the breakdown, his carry to a ruck also earned Engaldn their second converted penalty kick and by the time he exited, he was his team’s second busiest tackler.
6. Courtney Lawes – 9
Started with a lazy-looking offside but that mishap was a short-lived blip as he was sublime thereafter. There was one smart grasp of a loose ball, a turnover that led to an England penalty at the next ruck, and other smashing turnovers along the way had England in a driving seat where he also carried often and intelligently.
7. Tom Curry – 9
England’s defensive linchpin was unfortunately in the wars. Needed off-field treatment late in the opening half and his limping departure on 69 minutes after a chart-topping tackle effort was pivotal, South Africa scoring off the next play.
8. Ben Earl – 8.5
Tipped the scales 13kgs lighter than his opposite number Duane Vermeulen, but that mattered not a whit as he exploded into this and had the time of his life.
Replacements:
16. Theo Dan – No Rating
An unused replacement for the third match in a row.
17. Ellis Genge – 5
Given the closing 27 minutes to bring it home but came unstuck at the scrum.
18. Kyle Sinckler – 5.5
A 56th-minute sub, it was his infringement at a scrum five metres out on an England put in at 15-6 that proved immensely costly.
19. Ollie Chessum – 6.5
Kept England firing when introduced on 53 minutes, enjoying a different role to being a regular starter.
20. Billy Vunipola – 3.5
A short first-half cameo for Curry ended in a spill that sparked defensive panic and a concession for South Africa’s second penalty kick. Sent back on in the 69th minute for Curry again, England ‘losing’ the next 11 minutes 10-0 and the game ended with another fumble from him.
21. Danny Care – 7.5
Arrived on to give Farrell a drop goal pass and thrived from there.
22. George Ford – No rating
Sent on with two minutes to go for May with England a point down.
23. Ollie Lawrence – No rating
Introduced on 74 minutes, he carried twice in the game’s final play but to no avail.
The` bottom line is slightly tongue in cheek - England at their best wasn’t good enough to beat the Bokke at their worst!
Typical bloody Poms, only ones who would give themselves 9s and 8s even though they lost. No wonder everyone loves to see them lose.
But Courtney Lawes is a world class second tower.
Stop whinging. They only gave three 9’s. All of them deserved in what was an extraordinary performance. Give credit where credit is due. Even Owen Farrell only got an 8 and he was man of the match.
They only lost in the last minutes due to, Yes you guest it, another frazzled Kiwi ref.
Kicking away possession with ten mins to go and two scores reqd from SA wasn’t smart rugby.
It always puzzles me how someone of Billy V’s size can have so little impact. He should be ending people. Instead all that happens is the odd handling error and negative yards. 22st of empty shirt.
Billy hasn’t looked good for England since he got smashed by 2 Tonga players in the 2019 world cup, up until then he carried with venom and took 2 or 3 players to bring him down. Since then he’s makes no yards and doesn’t seem to impact a game, shame as he’s an absolute unit of a man
Always been overated, only looked good at premiership, never dominant against tier 1. Just like stickler, gender, mako V, all the last bunch of srumhalves, and all the back three’s. Flat track bullies. Pattern and blame between coaches RFU and premiership clubs not fully developing and only interested in the bottom line. There were the odd exception with attacking clubs, but they all eventually got ground down. Reaping what you sow, we're in a rut and these promised central type contracts will again go to the chosen few based on grace and fvour, not talent and potential. The problem is essentially a microcosim of the country. Its rotten at the top.
Yeah puzzles me too. He sure used to end people. Don't get why he's just a 22st void where there used to be a world class 8.
You jest,of course, if you think O’Keefe is the best. On a good day ,the best would be 7/10, as in this game, he is never better than6
Sinks isn't up to it in terms of scrummaging against the Boks. They persist with him because he adds a lot in the loose and against any other team his scrummaging is probably good enough…I don't blame him for what happened, not many can withstand the SA scrum, even the French props struggled BUT! After what happened to Mako Vunipola in the last world cup final to see it all happen again was very frustrating… Borthers recognised it in picking Marler and Cole and then threw the game in bringing on a prop who wasn't up to it. England need to pick props who scrummage. Anything else is a bonus. Genge I think is just about a good enough scrummager and is a world class ball carrier for a prop but Sinks I'm afraid isn't either, at least not anymore.
You could say Faz not giving Reinach the ball in the first half cost us the game or some silly offside penalties. We gave away 6 points in the first half through indiscipline.
Vunipola was appalling. Every game he's been involved he's been appalling. What the fuck were they thinking bringing him on when both Curry and Ludlam have played 8 for England.
These games always come down to small margins, a call here or there.
However the fact remains that Englands ongoing inability to fashion an attacking game beyond kick to compete is costing them dearly.
We simply don’t score enough tries to put teams under sustained scoreboard pressure.
Beyond defensive duties yesterday, we woukdn’t have known our centres or wingers were playing at all.
And it must now surely be recognised that neither sinckler nor genge are proficient enough scrummagers at this level, add to that the inexplicable decision to go with Vunipola over Ludlum, and that was the game.
I normally hate the way England kick away all their attacking ball.. but given the conditions and the unrealistic chances of us suddenly stringing together a competent attacking backline against the world champions… I thought it was the right thing to do.
Post world cup - abso-f***ing-loutely.. the way England attack is an embarrassment. Farrell needs to evolve his game or go. Personally I'd like to see Smith given the keys and back him rain or shine until he's world class.
I've literally been saying this about Farrell for 10 years. The forwards won us games under Eddie and Faz kicked the points. Our backline hasn't fired consistently since Lancaster left.
Why do England persist with Kyle Sinckler??? He's a poor scrummager and his penalties conceded against Ox probably cost England the game. Surely there must be better props available to England
Agree on the Vunipola comment. He has done nothing to deserve his place on this tour. We had better options in the squad or we could have moved Martin to the back row when Chessum came on.
Only one missing and worth a mention is Borthwick. He gets a 10. He managed to turn around a team after just 18 months of coaching. Seemingly down-trodden, Borthwick gave the English team a sense of self-belief and played to their strengths. This team certainly deserves their place in the top 5 world rugby rankings.
Biggest error was probably Billy instead of Ludlum or Underhill.
Give Steward 9 and Earl 6.
Earl was nowhere in the last 10.
Poor form to blame the ref.
I thought he did an excellent job in a hard fought semi
England's poor shape in the scrum was the main reason they lost.
Up till then they had the game won but the Bokke reserve players broke the poms hearts.
Okeefe was very even handed
Yes, the camera angle from behind the ref shows Genge's knee hit the deck straight after the hit. BOK explained it - the knee was the first offence, before the angle.
Can’t believe they give Farrell an 8. His lack of control, talking back to the ref, turned a normal penalty into an easy 3 pts when they got marched up the field. That 3 points made all the difference in the end.
And those two late bombs that drifted way too far, over the 22 for crucial marks. Of course also did some very good stuff in a narrow game tailored for him.
Great effort from england. The bench props were not up to par and England lost the momentum when they came on .
We need more powerful guys to replace Cole and Marler to move forward .
This pair too lightweight .
All black v S Africa will be a super final .
Yup if your props are still doing the job - don’t replace them. England lost momentum with their replacements
It was 65 minutes of perfect English rugby, even the weather seemed like a typical day in London. England trapped the boks into playing English rugby and really were in control until their scrum creaked; that was all it took. A couple of pressured errors and the boks saw a way to create a chance.
They lost the game by being unable to turn 65 minutes of dominance into meaningful points. The limited game they played allowed SA to play an equally limited game without getting behind on the scoreboard. SA were always in touching distance of England, never had to change their game or tactics or get out of their comfort zone to chase the game.
Do you really count that dross as perfect English rugby?
England team showed up and showed what they can do. Have to wonder where some of those performances were in six nations and other recent games. Good tactics for the team and the game and well executed. The fact this team was pipped says a lot about Bok determination and just the luck of a game. No one was a loser in that game even though this ream lost.
Scrum penalty made all the difference. A bit like Kwagga got a turnover in the final throws against France…when resting on his hands….
I genuinely believe Billy Vunipola put in the worst individual performance in an England shirt this World Cup, including Tom Curry versus Argentina.
Why he was even selected is a mystery but it sits on the coaches shoulders. Perhaps Borthwick wants the Aussie coaches job
if I compare the ratings the Boks and the English received on RugbyPass, it looks to me, that the performance relative to individual capabilities has been stated ….
O’Keefe sorting your boys out as usual…
I can say ‘‘Ahhh go suck your Mama’s hind tit, bitch..’’ but I will keep it civil. Four more years 🤣
They will be kicking themselves, they got their tactic’s right and were the better side on the night. However, fair play to SA they stayed in the fight and were patient, they looked out on their feet after previous efforts. Freddie Stewart poor box kick and billy vunipola joining the maul from the line out have cost them after 70minutes of steller tactics. The scrum decision for pollards final penalty was 50/50 too. Koch hip position was debatable. Congratulations to the them because if they beat NZ they will have played 5 of the top 6 sides to win the competition. I don’t remember any team doing this and therefore, should be deserved champions, in the last world cup they had a handy route bar the final with a poorer squad.
If you see the reverse angle footage on the final scrum, Genge’s knee hits grass well before Koch angled.
Are you a Saffa or a Kiwi?
Rubbish Game!
Yeah. See you in the final.
Steward was, by some distance, the best England player.
Not sure how Itoje and Curry get 9’s. England’s best forward was Ben Earl. Lawes was close, but that’s about it.
Not sure how you can type.
I expect because Curry hit everything that moved…and tackled them with his face. BUT I'm an arrogant Englishman so WTF do I know?
Well played England. No one gave them a chance and they came in with real intent. Always a great team at world cups.
Appreciate that… Written off but backs against the wall performance! Love it…