Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England preparing for October tour of Japan if historic July matches are cancelled

(Photo by Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)

England’s historic tour of Japan may be pushed back three months to October if their two tests in July are cancelled due to coronavirus.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking to BBC Radio 4 on Friday, England’s Rugby Football Union chief executive Bill Sweeney said the schedule switch remained one of many options as the COVID-19 outbreak continue to wreak havoc within rugby circles.

“We’re looking at a range of different contingencies,” he said.

“We might go there (Japan) in October. It’s all discussion and nothing’s fully nailed down. But one option is we would go down there, because obviously they’d rather host, they make more money when they host, and we’d come back and play our autumn internationals.

Video Spacer

Huw Jones takes on Denis Buckley in the semi-final of the RugbyPass FIFA charity tournament.

Video Spacer

Huw Jones takes on Denis Buckley in the semi-final of the RugbyPass FIFA charity tournament.

“If we weren’t able to travel to each other … we’d want to do something to fill our gap.”

Sweeney revealed another contingency plan being discussed was the possibility of “a Six Nations in the autumn but link it into the Six Nations the next year, and you have a home and away series” should their current end-of-year test schedule be called off.

The implementation of severe travel restrictions worldwide means England’s current November tests against New Zealand, Argentina, Tonga and Australia could be cancelled, opening an avenue for second Six Nations to be played this year.

However, three matches from the most recent edition of Europe’s premier international tournament are still to be played after being postponed due to the coronavirus pandemic.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s likely these fixtures would have to be completed first before any new form of Six Nations competition is undertaken later in the year.

Hosting test matches would provide the RFU with some much needed financial security, with the organisation set to lose up to £50 million over the next 18 months because of the outbreak.

Sweeney and England head coach Eddie Jones are among many high-profile executives within the RFU who have taken pay cuts of more than 25 percent.

A reduction in international match fees for players may soon follow suit, with Sweeney confirming that those conversations are already underway.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We started that before the crisis hit because that contract is up in the middle of this year,” he said. “We haven’t reached any conclusions yet. But that would obviously be a discussion we’d need to have.”

Although Wales’ top players have agreed to a 25 percent pay cut for the next three months, Sweeney declined to open up about what approach England’s players will take.

“They’re a very reasonable bunch of people,” he said. “We will sit down with them and we’d lay out the situation, we’d look at the financial position, and we’d have a discussion around what we feel is a reasonable figure.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

119 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death' Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death'
Search