Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The real danger with England's new hybrid contracts – Andy Goode

Ellis Genge of England looks on during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 match between England and Samoa at Stade Pierre Mauroy on October 07, 2023 in Lille, France. (Photo by Warren Little/Getty Images)

Steve Borthwick’s first ever enhanced Elite Player Squad selection looks fairly predictable on the face of it but hybrid contracts might just throw the cat among the pigeons.

ADVERTISEMENT

In some ways that’s exactly what the England head coach will want as he dangles a carrot to other players to do more in order to earn the same deal as the 17 players who have been initially named but it does have the potential to create a bit of division as well.

If you’re a Chandler Cunningham-South or Fin Baxter who may end up playing in every game, then you’re going to be a bit resentful that you haven’t got one of the new contracts and Dan Cole or Joe Marler might think they deserve one despite their age.

Video Spacer

Louis Rees-Zammit – Walk the Talk trailer | RPTV

Wales try-scoring wizard Louis Rees-Zammit joins Jim Hamilton for an exclusive chat about life in the NFL. Watch the full show on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

Louis Rees-Zammit – Walk the Talk trailer | RPTV

Wales try-scoring wizard Louis Rees-Zammit joins Jim Hamilton for an exclusive chat about life in the NFL. Watch the full show on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Both those stalwarts have played in almost every Test over the past year or so and Jamie George has been given one at the age of 34 but you can certainly see the thinking from Borthwick’s point of view.

I like the fact that he has held back eight slots rather than filling them all just because he can but some players will naturally feel aggrieved and the split of positions among those selected is interesting as well.

Three fly halves have been handed contracts when you normally only have a couple in an international squad, while Ellis Genge is the only prop rewarded and there are six of them in the current 36-man squad.

England
Ellis Genge of England makes his way out of the changing room for the second half during the Guinness Six Nations 2024 match between Scotland and England at BT Murrayfield Stadium on February 24, 2024 in Edinburgh, Scotland. (Photo by Dan Mullan – RFU/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)
ADVERTISEMENT

That does reflect the aforementioned ageing nature of the players in that position and the fact the younger ones haven’t yet nailed down their spots but it also indicates all positions are equal but some are more equal than others.

Clearly, Marcus Smith, Fin Smith and George Ford aren’t likely to all be in any match day 23 together let alone guaranteed to be in every one but fly half is a pivotal position and Borthwick wants to be able to manage his generals closely.

There can’t be any arguments about Alex Mitchell being given one as he has cemented himself as England’s first choice number nine. However, he is currently injured and none of the three scrum halves in the current squad have been given a deal so the Autumn Nations Series may act as an audition.

Back row is an interesting one, with only Ben Earl and Tom Curry among the lucky 17, and Sam Underhill can consider himself unfortunate. He has had his injuries in the past and that could count against players but he has started all of the last 9 Tests.

ADVERTISEMENT
Underhilll England recall verdict
Sam Underhill (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

If a player appears in every Test in a season, then there won’t be any difference in the remuneration they get anyway but this is all about security, feeling valued, being managed in a certain way and also having a say when it comes to commercial deals and other such issues.

I think that has been a big driver for the players, wanting to feel more able to influence their own earnings and image and have a greater say in rest periods and welfare issues rather than just having to take their match fee and do as they’re told.

It maybe isn’t quite as revolutionary is it first seemed when the enhanced EPS contracts were first discussed but you can bet your bottom dollar that every player wants to be on one and those not on the initial list will be striving to get one.

The devil is in the detail as always and they are reportedly worth £150,000, which covers the match fee for every Test in the campaign, and then an image rights fee of somewhere in the region of £10,000 per game is due on top of that.

The annual amount will obviously change in years when there are fewer Tests and in World Cup years when there are more and, interestingly, the players’ contracts will run for different lengths of time as club contracts do.

So, some of the initial 17 players may only have a one-year enhanced EPS deal but some could have a contract in place for three years, although presumably there will be clauses to get out of that in the case of injury and perhaps other factors too.

Henry Slade looks on during the England training session held at the Allianz Stadium on October 08, 2024 in London, England. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

It’ll be intriguing to see what clubs do when it comes to renegotiating contracts of players on these enhanced EPS deals but it isn’t like they are suddenly earning a lot more for their international commitments.

The reality is these contracts are more about Borthwick being able to have more control but the clubs will obviously benefit from the £33 million a season they’re getting as part of the new Professional Game Partnership rather than directly from these contracts.

The timing of the announcement of the deals is interesting. Borthwick will have known who he wants to give them to for a while but, with England in camp at the moment, there will definitely have been banter flying around about the 17 chosen ones, ‘Borthwick’s babes’ and the like.

Anyone looking to earn one of the eight remaining enhanced EPS deals need look no further than Henry Slade for the perfect example of how to deal with disappointment. He has gone from missing the cut for the World Cup to starting every Test since and fully deserves his contract.

It’s a fine line between keeping players on their toes and incentivising them and being somewhat divisive and the England head coach will be hoping he gets the right response from the more fringe squad members or the disappointed ones.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
c
ch 60 days ago

Typical negative comments from Andy Goode.

B
Bull Shark 63 days ago

Moving deck chairs around on the titanic.


👀

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

A
AllyOz 19 hours ago
Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?

I will preface this comment by saying that I hope Joe Schmidt continues for as long as he can as I think he has done a tremendous job to date. He has, in some ways, made the job a little harder for himself by initially relying on domestic based players and never really going over the top with OS based players even when he relaxed his policy a little more. I really enjoy how the team are playing at the moment.


I think Les Kiss, because (1) he has a bit more international experience, (2) has previously coached with Schmidt and in the same setup as Schmidt, might provide the smoothest transition, though I am not sure that this necessarily needs to be the case.


I would say one thing though about OS versus local coaches. I have a preference for local coaches but not for the reason that people might suppose (certainly not for the reason OJohn will have opined - I haven't read all the way down but I think I can guess it).


Australia has produced coaches of international standing who have won World Cups and major trophies. Bob Dwyer, Rod Macqueen, Alan Jones, Michael Cheika and Eddie Jones. I would add John Connolly - though he never got the international success he was highly successful with Queensland against quality NZ opposition and I think you could argue, never really got the run at international level that others did (OJohn might agree with that bit). Some of those are controversial but they all achieved high level results. You can add to that a number of assistants who worked OS at a high level.


But what the lack of a clear Australian coach suggests to me is that we are no longer producing coaches of international quality through our systems. We have had some overseas based coaches in our system like Thorn and Wessels and Cron (though I would suggest Thorn was a unique case who played for Australia in one code and NZ in the other and saw himself as a both a NZer and a Queenslander having arrived here at around age 12). Cron was developed in the Australian system anyway, so I don't have a problem with where he was born.


But my point is that we used to have systems in Australia that produced world class coaches. The systems developed by Dick Marks, which adopted and adapted some of the best coaching training approaches at the time from around the world (Wales particularly) but focussed on training Australian coaches with the best available methods, in my mind (as someone who grew up and began coaching late in that era) was a key part of what produced the highly skilled players that we produced at the time and also that produced those world class coaches. I think it was slipping already by the time I did my Level II certificate in 2002 and I think Eddie Jones influence and the priorities of the executive, particularly John O'Neill, might have been the beginning of the end. But if we have good coaching development programmes at school and junior level that will feed through to representative level then we will have


I think this is the missing ingredient that both ourselves and, ironically, Wales (who gave us the bones of our coaching system that became world leading), is a poor coaching development system. Fix that and you start getting players developing basic skills better and earlier in their careers and this feeds through all the way through the system and it also means that, when coaching positions at all levels come up, there are people of quality to fill them, who feed through the system all the way to the top. We could be exporting more coaches to Japan and England and France and the UK and the USA, as we have done a bit in the past.


A lack of a third tier between SR and Club rugby might block this a little - but I am not sure that this alone is the reason - it does give people some opportunity though to be noticed and play a key role in developing that next generation of players coming through. And we have never been able to make the cost sustainable.


I don't think it matters that we have an OS coach as our head coach at the moment but I think it does tell us something about overall rugby ecosystem that, when a coaching appointment comes up, we don't have 3 or 4 high quality options ready to take over. The failure of our coaching development pathway is a key missing ingredient for me and one of the reasons our systems are failing.

131 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Don’t tell my wife!' – Slade’s cheeky take on Exeter’s big win 'Don’t tell my wife!' – Slade’s cheeky take on Exeter’s big win
Search