Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England RWC: 'Eddie may stay and they may want him'

Eddie Jones (PA)

Dean Richards has raised the possibility of Eddie Jones continuing in his role as England head coach if he wins the 2023 Rugby World Cup in France and does not support the view that a successor has to be English.

ADVERTISEMENT

That is the aim of Bill Sweeney, the Rugby Football Union chief executive who has stated that: “We believe we’ve got such a wealth of English coaches in the game. As a leading rugby nation we should be developing English coaches and an English style of play. That should be long-term and therefore the preference would be to have an English set-up, as far as I’m concerned.”

Richards, who won 48 England caps and has unrivalled experience as a director of rugby in the Premiership, takes a different view and believes English success at the World Cup would erase the memory of two successive poor Six Nations finishes for Jones.

Video Spacer

Nathan Hughes – A Fijian Ferrari, Bronco Tests and Playing for England | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 27

We hear about his early days playing in New Zealand before moving to Wasps and eventually lining out for England. He gives us an incredible insight into life under Eddie Jones and Pat Lam, why he left Bristol for Bath and his aspirations to line out for Fiji. Lots more including his introduction to Lawrence Dallaglio, his run-in with Ryan Wilson when England played Scotland and his England debut versus the Boks.

Video Spacer

Nathan Hughes – A Fijian Ferrari, Bronco Tests and Playing for England | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 27

We hear about his early days playing in New Zealand before moving to Wasps and eventually lining out for England. He gives us an incredible insight into life under Eddie Jones and Pat Lam, why he left Bristol for Bath and his aspirations to line out for Fiji. Lots more including his introduction to Lawrence Dallaglio, his run-in with Ryan Wilson when England played Scotland and his England debut versus the Boks.

He explained: “Ultimately, the run through to the quarter and semi-finals of the 2023 World Cup (for England) seems pretty simple at the moment and if
you are within two matches of winning a World Cup then everything will be
forgotten. Eddie may stay and they may want him to.”

If Sweeney and the panel sitting in judgement of Jones decide he should end his tenure after the World Cup in France then Richards wants the selection to be open to all candidates. “It must be the most suitable coach to win us a World Cup as simple as that,” he added. “It doesn’t necessarily have to be English but they need an understanding of what the English culture is and the psyche to get the best out of the English (players).

“It is giving that clear pathway to understand what it takes to become an international player. There are a number of candidates – a lot of them English – and some foreign guys as well. I don’t think they necessarily have to have operated at international level but there has to be an understanding of their capabilities and if they match the criteria you have put in place.

Related

“It is difficult at times to perceive how good a person can be by just
watching them working alongside an international head coach. The strengths
that you gain from being a director of rugby or head coach in the Premiership are absolutely massive because it is different to any other sport. But you have to work out if those strengths and weaknesses you gain in the Premiership are going to be needed at international level because they are very different.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It is about what criteria they put in place and if think there are guys out
there who would fit the bill who have worked in international rugby in the
past and those who haven’t.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

34 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What is the future of rugby in 2025? What is the future of rugby in 2025?
Search