Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England take down France in World Cup nail-biter

England celebrate victory. Photo by Fiona Goodall - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images

It was hard fought, but England managed a 27th consecutive Test rugby win with a World Cup pool round match defeat of France.

ADVERTISEMENT

Centre Emily Scarratt scored all of England’s points as they claimed a tense 13-7 victory over France in their women’s Rugby World Cup Pool C clash at the Northland Events Centre in Whangarei on Saturday to record a 27th consecutive Test win.

England qualify for the quarter-finals having dominated territory and possession, but France stayed in the contest to the end with superb defence as Scarratt managed a converted try and two penalties.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

France’s lone try came from flanker Gaelle Hermet as they spent the majority of the match on the back foot, but troubled England when they did get possession and took the ball through the phases.

England had smashed Fiji 84-19 in their tournament opener, but France provided a much sterner examination with their organised defence and bravery.

Related

It took 24 minutes for the first score as incessant pressure won reward with a try for Scarratt.

Loose-forward Alex Matthews carried the ball forward at every opportunity and following one of her bursts, back-row partner Marlie Packer fed Scarratt, who darted back inside to cross the line.

England continued to camp in the France half, but a Scarratt penalty was all they had to show for it as they led 10-0 at halftime.

ADVERTISEMENT

The second half followed a similar pattern to the first with Scarratt adding a second penalty to extend England’s advantage.

But France finally found some fluency in attack and with a rare foray into the England 22, scored a superb try.

Flyhalf Caroline Drouin’s chip behind the England defence was collected by wing Joanna Grisez, who fed Hermet to score and reduce the deficit to six points.

It set up a tense finish, but France continually kicked away possession instead of testing the England defence with ball in hand and the latter were able to see out the contest.

ADVERTISEMENT

Earlier, United States finally clicked into gear to beat Japan 30-17 and boost their quarter-final hopes.

Japan had produced an outstanding performance to lead 5-3 at halftime after facing a strong wind through the first spell.

The US seized their first lead with a try to Joanna Kitklinski in the 45th minute but Japan responded with a five-pointer to winger Hinano Nagura to lead 10-8 with 30 minutes remaining.

The US attack was sluggish in the first 50 minutes but it finally came together and finished with three tries and 17 unanswered points.

Japan winger Komachi Imaguchi scored a brilliant solo try four minutes from fulltime but the United States extended their lead with a late penalty.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search