Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England U20s doctor found guilty of Six Nations misconduct charges

Lorenzo Pani of Italy U20 competes for the ball with Deago Bailey of England U20during the Six Nations match between Italy and England U20 at Stadio comunale di Monigo on February 11, 2022 in Treviso, Italy. (Photo by Federugby/Federugby via Getty Images)

The England U20s doctor who was the subject of a concussion controversy during the Under-20s Six Nations has been suspended.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dr Nigel Rayner’s behaviour and actions on the night were described as both ‘grave’ and ‘unacceptable’ in the report.

Dr Rayner was England’s team doctor during the game in which an England player received a head knock. Wing Deago Bailey fell to the ground having competed with an opponent for a high ball during the 77th minute of the match.

Video Spacer

Zach Mercer – Life in Montpellier & England Ambitions | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 30

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 55:26
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 55:26
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    Zach Mercer – Life in Montpellier & England Ambitions | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 30

    The Independent Match Day Doctor (MDD) assessed that Bailey needed to leave the field to undertake a Head Injury Assessment (HIA), which was reported to the referee and to Rayner.

    Rayner challenged the need for the player to leave the field to undertake the HIA and his interactions with referee were heavily criticized at the time and led to a Six Nations review of the incident.

    Dr Rayner was charged with; A: Allowing a player to return to the field of play, when an HIA had been called; B: interfering with the HIA process and challenging those in a decision-making position; and C: disrespectful conduct towards officials.

    A statement reads: ‘The Committee noted that in respect of Charge A and B, Dr Rayner’s actions were grave and found that the HIA protocol is mandatory and must be complied with by all concerned. The independent Judicial Committee was unanimously of the view that an entry point of eight weeks would be appropriate regarding Charges A and B.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “Regarding Charge C, Dr Rayner’s actions towards the MDD were found to be unacceptable and not in the spirit of the game, and the Judicial Committee decided upon a two-week suspension, those two weeks to run concurrently with the eight-week suspension for Charges A and B.

    “The independent Judicial Committee applied full mitigation (50%) based on Dr Rayner’s previous impeccable record and acknowledgement of culpability, leaving a total suspension of four weeks.

    “It was accepted by the independent Judicial Committee that Dr Rayner had been stood down for three weeks in which he would otherwise have been Team Doctor for the England U20s, participating in the Six Nations U20’s Championship, and therefore determining that he had already served three of the four-week suspension.

    “The suspension from any involvement in the game of Rugby Union, will end at 00:01 hours on Friday 29 April 2022.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “Dr Rayner was advised of his right to appeal the decision.”

    The report also found that while shortcomings in the HIA process on the night, ultimately the correct actions were taken.

    Related

    “The HIA Review Panel concluded there were no “Category 1” indicators that would have led to the immediate permanent removal of the player from the field. However, ‘Category-2” events; “mechanism of injury and post-event actions” were such that the Match Day Doctor (MDD) was correct to call for an HIA-1 assessment.

    “It was also noted that it is the MDD who has the final say in calling for an assessment and not a team doctor. The correct result was achieved; the Player’s need to undergo HIA-1 assessment, but this was against a backdrop in which the applicable protocols and regulations were implemented in a manner a long way short of what they were designed to achieve.”

    “The HIA Review Panel examined the role of the Referee in this incident and determined that she (they) dealt appropriately with the incident itself, stopping play promptly and not restarting until everything had been resolved.”

    The panel suggested – among other things – that Pre-Match Medical Meetings are “vitally important to the efficient and effective performance of all match day medical personnel”.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

    Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

    Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

    Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

    Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

    England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

    Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

    Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    0 Comments
    Be the first to comment...

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Features

    Comments on RugbyPass

    r
    reginaldgarcia 28 minutes ago
    Crusaders rookie earns 'other than Dupont' praise from All Blacks star

    My father, a retired schoolteacher, has always been cautious with his money. He worked hard his entire life to build a modest retirement fund and trusted that it would support him in his golden years. So, when he told me about an “exclusive” investment opportunity in cryptocurrency that promised high returns, I was immediately suspicious. But he was convinced it was legitimate—after all, the website looked professional, and the salesperson had been so persuasive over the phone. Despite my warnings, he invested 15,000 USD of his savings. At first, everything seemed fine. He received regular updates and saw “profits” reflected in his online account. But when he tried to withdraw some money, the website suddenly went offline, and the phone number was disconnected. My father was devastated. He had been scammed, and his hard-earned savings were gone. I knew I had to act quickly. I reached out to TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY, a company I had read about online that specialized in tracing online fraud. I explained the situation, providing them with all the details: the fake website, the transaction records, and even the emails from the scammer. The team at TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY was incredibly understanding and assured me they would do everything possible to help. Using their expertise in digital forensics, they traced the scammer’s digital footprint and identified the offshore account where the money had been transferred. They worked tirelessly with international authorities to freeze the account and recover the funds. Within a few weeks, they successfully returned the 15,000 USD to my father. The relief on his face was indescribable. Not only had TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY restored his savings, but they had also given him peace of mind. They even took the time to educate him on how to spot investment scams in the future, empowering him to protect himself. This brought our family closer together. My father now understands the importance of skepticism and due diligence, and I’m grateful to TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY for their incredible work. They didn’t just recover money, they restored my father’s faith in justice and gave him a second chance to enjoy his retirement.EMAIL..Techcybersforcerecovery(@)cyberservices(.)comWHATSAPP... + 1.5.6.1.7.2.6.3.6.9.7

    8 Go to comments
    J
    JW 1 hour ago
    Kyren Taumoefolau All Blacks stance splits opinions on eligibility

    MP are a NZ side through and through, NZ is even having to pay for it.

    Yes they caved to public demand, I bet it accomplished a lot of internal goals. They could have left it to the other groups, but I’m of the belief that they weren’t showing the capability to make it work as being a good reason for NZR to jump in and do it. I think it’s actually funded 50/50 between NZR and WR though.

    (when nothing was stopping a pi player playing for any side in Super Rugby)

    Neither is that fact true. Only 3 non NZ players are allowed in each squad.


    I see you also need to learn what the term poach means - take or acquire in an unfair or clandestine way. - Moana have more slots for non eligible players (and you have seen many return to an NZ franchise) so players are largely making their own choice without any outside coercion ala Julian Savea.

    Not one of these Kiwis and Aussies would go live in the Islands to satisfy any criteria, and I’d say most of them have hardly ever set foot in the islands, outside of a holiday.

    Another inaccurate statement. Take Mo’unga’s nephew Armstrong-Ravula, if he is not eligible via ancestry in a couple of generations time, he will be eligible because he plays his rugby there (even if he’s only their for rugby and not living there), that is a recent change made by World Rugby to better reflect examples like Fabian Holland and Fakatava.

    It’s becoming the jump-ship/zero loyalty joke that international League is.

    Look I understand you’re reason to cry and make an example at any opportunity, but you don’t really need to anymore, other recent changes made by WR are basically going to stop the Ireland situation, and time (perhaps no more than a decade) will fix the rest.

    26 Go to comments
    LONG READ
    LONG READ Scotland's senior players 'have gone to a different level' in quest for top-three finish Scotland's senior players 'have gone to a different level' in quest for top-three finish
    Search