Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'The regime has changed in that it’s not as much forced upon you'

By PA
BAGSHOT, ENGLAND - JULY 18: Will Stuart, Jack Willis and Tom Curry of England sprint during an England Rugby Training Session at Pennyhill Park on July 18, 2023 in Bagshot, England. (Photo by Bryn Lennon/Getty Images)

Flanker Lewis Ludlam says England’s players are self-policing the consumption of sweet treats in a bid to be in peak condition for a shot at World Cup glory.

ADVERTISEMENT

Steve Borthwick’s preliminary squad are in the midst of preparations for the tournament in France, which kicks off in just seven weeks’ time.

Players were last week put through their paces in the heat of Italy before returning to home soil to continue building towards next month’s four warm-up fixtures.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Northampton captain Ludlam revealed diet rules and weight monitoring have been relaxed slightly since head coach Borthwick replaced Eddie Jones.

Yet, after exclaiming he had not “seen cake in weeks” after spotting a buffet at the team’s Surrey training base, the 27-year-old insists players are not allowing each other to give in to temptation.

“The regime has changed in that it’s not as much forced upon you – you’ve got the trust to do everything the right way so we are in the best position to go and put ourselves in the best spot this World Cup,” he said.

“There’s a general feeling amongst the squad that we’ve got to be on the money and making sure we’re making decisions so we are better rugby players the next week and the next month.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

“It is a good group of lads and we keep each other in check.

“There might be a birthday cake here and there but I think the lads are pretty understanding of what’s ahead of us.

“In the grand scheme of things, it is a short time in our career when we can be really on it to give ourselves the chance of creating some really special memories.”

England take on Wales home and away in early August and then face Six Nations champions Ireland in Dublin and Fiji at Twickenham before heading to France to begin their Pool D campaign against Argentina on September 9 in Marseille.

Borthwick’s appointment last December led to Saints star Ludlam being surrounded at Test level by a management team previously in charge of his club’s fierce rivals Leicester.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 19-cap back-row forward initially found it strange setting aside hostilities and having old enemies as allies.

But he believes the England setup – led by former Tigers coaches Borthwick, Richard Wigglesworth, Aled Walters, Kevin Sinfield and Tom Harrison – is beginning to feel like a club environment.

“It was weird to get over in the beginning, especially Tom, who obviously loves Leicester and having been up against him a few times,” said Ludlam.

“Now, because we’ve been in camp for a long period of time – we don’t normally get this long period without games – it’s starting to feel like a club coming together rather than an international team where you’re only in for six weeks or whatever.

“It’s starting to come together really nicely into one unit.”

England’s final 33-man World Cup selection is due to be announced on August 7.

Injured quintet Billy Vunipola, Mako Vunipola, Ollie Lawrence, Ollie Chessum and Jack Walker, who were not included in Borthwick’s initial 41-strong training squad, are continuing their rehabilitation.

“They’re good, they’re on their programmes and working extremely hard to get themselves ready,” said scrum coach Harrison.

“Everyone’s got different timescales but they’re doing their best to be available.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
M.W.Keith 26 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

SA will drop? Not according to the quality of output in the last few years. Any South African will tell you that they feel more confident in the level of SA rugby than they have in years. The Springboks immediately improved when Rassie championed a global outlook on the game and the structures. Players are proud of their ability to pull contracts overseas. They are also proud to play at home. Are SA teams dominating the URC? Not exactly. Are they playing well? Absolutely. Is the national team having its greatest era ever? Undoubtedly. Will this last no? Hell no. Is that the fault of opening the selection policy? Of course not. Teams ebb and flow, there will always be winner and losers somewhere. The global standard of rugby has raised enormously. We all know ABs fans expect to be the best there ever was for all and eternity; and undoubtedly NZ will always be sitting at the high table due to rugby culture and exceptional athletes, but to suggest that allowing overseas players into the national team will automatically decrease domestic strength has no basis in reality.


But of course, this isn't my team and it's not my problem. There will always be people on either side of the fence, I just believe that closing off a national team just because a players seeks a salary elsewhere is indicative of a very limited mindset. All I hope for is for the ABs to continue being a force on the field, regardless of who plays in the jersey, so that the Springboks can continue being pushed everytime they meet each other on the field.

90 Go to comments
M
M.W.Keith 39 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Something being relevant just because someone wants to make it relevant is a bit of a logical fallacy there. Similarly, I also said that these traditional aspects of rugby need to change - rather than it being what makes the sport beautiful. It's a beautiful sport because of the long-standing rivalries and the way the game is played. However, if rugby wants to become a global sport then some old ways are going to have to update themselves for the sake of service to the sport. This is the entire point of my comment, which perhaps you missed? I really don't think that embracing the global game will turn rugby into football, let's be honest. Test is the pinnacle of rugby, unlike football where club reigns supreme. This is a culture that won't change.


You speak of four of the top five nations having closed border policies. Well, Ireland is really just Leinster and a handful of other players. Irish rugby is coming up well, but let's not pretend there is parity between clubs. If you want to eb in the national team, your best chance is to get into Dublin let alone stay in the country. England rugby? They have often been said to have one of the deepest pools and pockets in the game, so they have the potential to be healthy regardless. If they can sort out their identity anyway. But thene again, are they so healthy? Clubs closing down, extraordinary players in the prime leaving (Ribbans, Arundell et al.), it's not a great look over there. France? France is a whole different kettle of fish - no other nation in the world can claim to have such strong multi-league club rugby, so even there they have an enormous feeder culture. Besides, loads of players want to move to France for the money so it's a moot point even thinking of reasons why French players would want to leave their home country. The money is at home.


Your comment on whether or not it is worth it, considering the length of the season. This is a very fair question, one in which SA is going to have to learn the answer to over the coming seasons. But there are two points to consider here: 1) can this not create a situation whereby increased depth and rotation for player health and safety allows for more players to get game time? If Rassie can rotate 50+ players in a season and maintain a great record, then it can be done. Naturally, clubs won't have the same resources at hand but nevertheless there is a solution to be found rather than restricting the top level of the game to a smaller number of players. If rugby wants to expand its reach, it is going to have to expand its structures in order to do so. The second point is that this exact question strengthens the call for a global calendar. Get NH and SH national and club teams aligned.


However, I do think that you have missed my point. Basically, why should a player be excluded from selection just because they earn money elsewhere? Yes, it's a difficult scenario. Yes, there will have to be workarounds. But to say that "it is simpler and easier to manage" is a lazy excuse. This handling of the Mounga situation is a total farce, because there is no clear vision here. Certain players are given sabbaticals, or they sign short term contracts with foreign teams knowing that by and large their national jersey is nailed down. Why not just let them play overseas, if their jersey is so nailed down? There is no easy answer to the problems we all know that global rugby is running headlong into, but right now there seem to be a lot of cooks with a lot of their own priorities in the kitchen and something is going to have to give.

90 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ben Youngs voices exactly what every England fan is thinking Ben Youngs voices exactly what every England fan is thinking
Search