Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England wing Max Malins shocked by reasons for omission in Six Nations

By PA
(Photo by Bryn Lennon/Getty Images)

Max Malins admits it came as a shock when told by Eddie Jones that he was being dropped by England during last year’s Guinness Six Nations because of his body language. Malins marked his first international appearance since being axed with a two-try salvo in Saturday’s 29-23 Six Nations defeat by Scotland, a performance that helped heal the wounds inflicted a year earlier.

ADVERTISEMENT

Having appeared in all four championship matches in 2022, the Saracens wing was unexpectedly discarded before the trip to France and given an explanation he found hard to process. “My body language in a walk-through – that was the reason given,” said Malins, who upon missing out on the subsequent tour to Australia went on a three-night holiday to Mykonos with team-mate Ben Earl.

“I didn’t understand it. I was taken aback by it. I’d like to think my attitude was always there. He may have seen something… I’m quite a relaxed guy, not necessarily buzzing around the place all the time. Maybe my relaxed nature put a thought in his head.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“It was certainly a shock at the time and you don’t tend to understand it straight away. It was gutting at the time. When you’re in that shirt and it gets taken away from you, it’s a tough one to take.

“All you can do is take a step back from it and move forward. I had to take it on the chin, reflect on it, and move on. It certainly highlighted to me how quickly it could be taken away and how you should never take being in this environment – being in camp, playing for England – for granted.”

Related

Jones has since been replaced by Steve Borthwick after the RFU reacted to a dismal 2022 by sacking the Australian and appointing his former number two. Borthwick’s faith in Malins, one of the Premiership’s most clinical finishers, was given immediate justification with the Scots unpicked twice by the Bristol-bound 26-year-old.

“Steve has made it clear that we are here because of club form. He asks us to go out there and express what we are good at. He doesn’t necessarily highlight your downfalls,” Malins said. “He obviously wants you to make improvements, where you can, but his big thing is asking us to show what we can do and show your strengths. It’s pleasing to hear and gives you confidence as a player.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind

The essence of rugby a fair physical competition for the ball?

No, that's describing League. Rugby is a beautiful game about executing scoring maneuvers. You should take up league, right up your ally as a physical contest imo.

If that is so using the scrum as just a reset takes out the competitiveness

If we forget (or even use to help understand) your first question, I still don't understand where you're going/what you're thinking.


What do you mean by just a reset? Like league where the ball is rolled/placed at the 8s feet to play with? I don't agree with any of those crazy suggestions here (even as a reward to the team that wins the scrum, I'm not even sure it would be a reward), no ones talking about depowering the scrum. At least not in this article/instance.

If there is no penalty for being beaten in the scrum we might as well just restart with a tap

To who? The team that was previously in possession? A scrum is a means of contesting for possession after play stops in open field (as apposed to when the ball goes dead, where it's a lineout). Are you proposing that core basis of the game is removed? I think it would make a much better game to just remove the knock on, as someone has already said, scrums resulting in a penalty as punishment for knocking the ball on is ridiculous. If you want to turnover the ball when someone looses it, you simply have to regather it before they do. That's how ever other game I can think of other than League works. So just get rid of the problem at the roots, it would be a much better "drastic" change than removing the contest from restarts.

In the lineout ruck and maul successful competition gets rewarded and illegal competition gets penalised no one is arguing about that. So is the scrum different?

No one is arguing that removal from scrums either. It is the plethora of nothing offences, the judgmental "technical" decisions by a referee, that are in the middle that are being targeted. Of course this is not a unique problem to scrums, lineouts will result in penalties simply from a contact of arms by jumpers, or rucks whenever a play hangs an arm over someones shoulder when cleaning them out. This article is about tackling the 'major' offences hindering the quality of the game.


But other than these questions, if you want to know my main opinions in my post you will see I agree that the ball should need (always and in every type of circumstance) to be played if it is available at scrum time.


Otherwise the TLDR of all my comments (even thoughts in general) on this particular question is that I agree advantage should be had in instances were the team with the ball 'won' the 'advantage' and where some sort of advantage was 'taken' away. In this respect the scrum had to be rolling forward to win an advantage. But I'm flexible in that if it speeds up the game to award a penatly, that's great, but if they also stop the clock for scrums, I'm happy with way instead. That is very few instances by the way, the majority of the time the ball is able to be played however.


The big question I have asked Bull about is what advantage or opportunity was taken away from a strong scrumming team when opposition causes the scrum to collapse? What sort of advantage was taken away that they need to be a penalty reward, that would seem to be way over the top for most offences to me.


So on that point, I'll like your perspective on a couple of things. How do you think lineouts compare to scrums? Do they offer you enough reward for dominance, and do you think all such meaningless offences should be lessoned (slips or pops while going backwards, contact with the jumper, closing the game, good cleanouts to some fool whos ducked his head in a ruck etc)?

151 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Salmaan Moerat: 'I’ve not really processed the magnitude of leading the Springboks' Salmaan Moerat: 'I’ve not really processed the magnitude of leading the Springboks'
Search