Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England would 'absolutely' have won 'by plenty' if not for red card

Lydia Thompson was shown red for her hit on Portia Woodman.

Former England international Vicky Fleetwood believes England would have lifted the Rugby World Cup in Eden Park with ease if it weren’t for a first-half red card after just 18 minutes of the first half.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lydia Thompson was shown a red card after barrelling into Portia Woodman, a hit that also brought the New Zealander’s final to a premature end. The Black Ferns great was taken off the pitch on the a medical cart, an ignominious end to her tournament.

The tackle was referred to TMO Ben Whitehouse by referee Hollie Davidson, before Davidson could be heard saying: “For me it’s clear head on head, she’s coming across at speed, it’s a reckless action, so it’s a red card for me.”

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

England, who had been 14-0 up, were then forced onto the backfoot, with the Black Ferns storming back into the game in the second-half to lead going into the final moments of the game.

When asked by Sky Sports what she thought of the impact the red card had on the game, former Red Rose Fleetwood said that England would ‘absolutely’ have won if not the for the dismissal.

“I’m pretty flat. Obviously, my friends are out there. They’re the ones taking the field. For them to go 60 minutes when down to 14, an incredible effort, it was phenomenal.”

“Absolutely,” said Fleetwood when asked would the Red Roses have won with 15 players. “To be able to go toe to toe for sixty minutes with a player down… if you’ve got that extra, yeah, definitely, I think England would have won by plenty.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Going into this game they showed what a force they were to reckon with 30 games on the bounce that they’ve won.

“It was their’s to lose and unfortunately losing Lydia so early on, that wasn’t meant to be England’s day today.”

Fleetwood also noted touched on the lost lineout in the final play of the game, observing that England would have won that lineout 99 times out of 100.

“To lose the way they did. Ninety-nine out of 100 times, England are scoring that in that last play. To lose that lineout in the last few seconds is going to be heartbreaking for them.”

ADVERTISEMENT

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

18 Comments
A
Arnold 769 days ago

Rugby is not about mauling the ball for 80 minutes.
I could understand if it was pouring down with rain.
There’s 15 in a side, not 8 and it’s a team sport (Not the ferns fault you lost a player)
That’s how the black ferns won. By playing as a team, not separating the forwards and the backs.

L
Leeann 769 days ago

No way. That Red card was well deserved, Portia Woodman missed 60 minutes of the final game through No fault of hers. It was a dangerous and high tackle. safety first. Portia is no slouch, she's the Top female try scorer in history, who knows how many tries she could've scored.

Not to mention the Fact that NZ missed how many conversations, the score would've been much bigger had she converted. It is what it is, NZ had a better attacking game and England had the maul and that's It..NZ deserved the win, period.

P
Pecos 769 days ago

Her grief talking a load of nonsense.

G
Graham 769 days ago

Vicky Fleetwood may very well believe that England would have lifted the Rugby World Cup in Eden Park with ease if it weren’t for a first-half red card after just 18 minutes of the first half.
Well I have a belief that Porsha Woodman showed enough in her short time in the final to convince me that she would have scored a hat trick and that New Zealand would have won by plenty if she was allowed to play a full part in the game.
The fact that she was taken out of the game by a clear head on head collision ruined the game for those who had come expecting to see Woodman in full flight.
Is there anything to say that my belief is any less valid than Fleetwood's belief?
p.s. Hows the grape growing industry in England? Are they still all sour?

C
Calum 770 days ago

Some good comments here. Remember the 95 men’s WC. If not for Suzy playing with our food, the best team would have won that final too. Just saying. What I’m saying is shit happens. Get over it.

E
Eric 770 days ago

Another 4 years I suppose. The significant majority of England's tries at this world cup came from their rolling maul. Until an opposition team plays another style of game that only needs 30% of the ball and plays to its strengths. A rugby game is played by 15 players not 8. England had class players right across park they did not take advantage of it. But then again they came up against a tactical genius of the game in The Professor Wayne Smith...

E
Euan 770 days ago

The Red Roses do not play rugby, they play Rolling Maul (a form of legalised cheating). Fortunately for the game, the team that ran the ball and entertained the crowd won the game and the Cup. Go home and grow your game, not your muscles.

d
drprop 770 days ago

One defeat does not define a team. The Roses have done a huge amount for rugby in general and the women’s game in particular. The Ferns are beneficiaries of that along with the women’s game world wide. I’m saddened to hear people moaning about the red card. Davidson is one of our best refs across all formats of the game. Her justification for the card did not include that it was very late. In terms of strategy it is perfectly understandable that forward power especially in the women’s game will win you 30 games on the trot. The Ferns showed that firstly it can be done and secondly, witness the last lineout, it can go very pear-shaped. Will England learn anything from this disappointment. I hope so. But more importantly other countries will learn from both sides.

A
Andrew 770 days ago

Gee. What a classless opinion piece.

D
Doug 770 days ago

Respect to England for fighting so well with 14 players.
Even bigger respect for to NZ for the win, especially after the English were getting a bit too cocky about their winning streak.

I'm glad the running game prevailed over the pushing game.
While England did out-muscle NZ, NZ out-ran & out-maneuvered England & it was a joy to watch.

NZ's brand of creative fast open play is way more exciting to see than England's 1-dimensional game of driving mauls.
ie - watching an attacking back line break the defense, sprint down field, passing the ball on the fly multiple times & diving over the line to score is way more entertaining than seeing a bunch of bodies in a slow motion push-of-war.

Not only did NZ win, they won in style.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search