Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

EPCR considering plans to reduce its number of Champions Cup teams

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Plans to reduce the Heineken Champions Cup to either 18 or 16 teams are on the table at European Professional Club Rugby (EPCR), with a decision on these discussions due shortly as the Swiss-based organising body look to put in place a range of commercial and broadcasting deals beyond 2022.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking to the Guardian, EPCR director general Vincent Gaillard said: “We need to have some certainty for the direction of the tournament. We have received a very clear mandate from the board for the process to be concluded shortly. 

“We are discussing whether there might be potential for change or improvement but if the desire is to stay with a 20-team Champions Cup that is what we will do. We’re not in a bad place, we just need to project ourselves into the future.”

Aside from sticking by the current format of 20 teams divided into five pools of four, a set-up that has been in place since EPCR took over the tournament from the ousted ERC administration in 2014, there are rival proposals to cut the number of participants to 18 and 16.

Reducing to 18 – six pools of three – would immediately put a stop to the current situation where teams from the same country can play each other in the pool stages. Exeter-Sale, Harlequins-Bath and Toulouse-Montpellier have been among the same-nation fixtures this winter.

(Continue reading below…)

Video Spacer

The freeing up of some pool weekends in the calendar with a reduction in teams would also create the potential for home and away semi-finals.

However, some officials are also pushing to maintain the current 20-team set-up where it is reported attendances in this season’s tournament are up seven per cent even though a number of Premiership clubs have fielded weakened teams in some games.  

ADVERTISEMENT

Only last month, EPCR chairman Simon Halliday admitted to RugbyPass that financially the tournament hadn’t done as well as it was hoped since reducing from 24 to 20 teams in 2014/15.

“On the field, we have made a lot of good improvements. We have hosted good finals, we have changed one of the criteria so Benetton qualified by right this season, we developed free-to-air where there wasn’t any and brought it to more people. Commercially, it has been a disappointment. Lots of reasons for that. The rebranding takes time. 

“Secondly, a lot of sponsors have gone from being global into being pan-Europe, even local, so the way they allocate their money has changed, the way people look at traditional sponsorship has changed. Look what happened with Six Nations, for example.”

Dominant teams have been the story of this winter’s action as Leinster, Exeter, Ulster and Toulouse head four of the five pools with four wins from four, while Racing, the other pool leaders, are also unbeaten with three wins and a draw in their four matches.

ADVERTISEMENT

WATCH: Scotland rugby legend Gavin Hastings surprises one of Glasgow Warriors’ longest-serving fans, Eric Graham, by giving him a lift to Scotstoun for a match in a Land Rover Discovery   

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
MA 4 hours ago
How the four-team format will help the Wallabies defeat the Lions

In regards to Mack Hansen, Tuipoloto and others who talent wasnt 'seen'..

If we look at acting, soccer and cricket as examples, Hugh Jackman, the Heminsworths in acting; Keith Urban in Nashville, Mike Hussey and various cricketers who played in UK and made the Australian team; and many soccer players playing overseas.


My opinion is that perhaps the ' 'potential' or latent talent is there, but it's just below the surface.


ANd that decision, as made by Tane Edmed, Noah, Will Skelton to go overseas is the catalyst to activate the latent and bring it to the surface.


Based on my personal experience of leaving Oz and spending 14 months o/s, I was fully away from home and all usual support systems and past memories that reminded me of the past.


Ooverseas, they weren't there. I had t o survive, I could invent myself as who I wanted, and there was no one to blame but me.


It bought me alive, focused my efforts towards what I wanted and people largely accepted me for who I was and how I turned up.


So my suggestion is to make overseas scholarships for younger players and older too so they can benefit from the value offered by overseas coaching acumen, established systems, higher intensity competition which like the pressure that turns coal into diamonds, can produce more Skeltons, Arnold's, Kellaways and the like.


After the Lion's tour say, create 20 x $10,000 scholarships for players to travel and play overseas.


Set up a HECS style arrangement if necessary to recycle these funds ongoingly.


Ooverseas travel, like parenthood or difficult life situations brings out people's physical and emotional strengths in my own experiences, let's use it in rugby.

68 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Money not everything in Toulouse ‘paradise’ as rivals try to rein in champions Money not everything in Toulouse ‘paradise’ as rivals try to rein in champions
Search