Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

EPCR dismisses COVID postponement possibilities

EPCR has ruled out postponent possibilities

European rugby’s governing body EPCR have firmly shut the door on the suggestion that some of this weekend’s games could be rearranged to help clubs hit by South Africa’s COVID-19 outbreak.

ADVERTISEMENT

Since Munster, Scarlets and Cardiff were last week stranded in Cape Town, there has been much speculation regarding the possibility of postponing their round one fixtures in the Heineken Champions Cup and European Challenge Cup.

However, EPCR has issued a statement in which it acknowledges that player welfare must be the first priority before going on to eliminate any thought of rearranging games.

Video Spacer

Munster CEO Ian Flanagan

Video Spacer

Munster CEO Ian Flanagan

“We thank the rugby community for their comments in relation to the COVID quarantine situation for certain clubs,” their statement read.

“Player welfare is paramount to EPCR, the teams and the players and as such we have worked to enable the best possible solution.

“If the clubs feel they are unable to field a team that can safely partake in professional rugby at the required level they are able to forfeit the game.

“We fully appreciate that this is not a route many will want to take however following an extensive review with all parties, postponement of the matches is unfortunately not a viable option due to the extremely busy rugby calendar.”

ADVERTISEMENT

All three teams will be without significant numbers of senior players after the European Union and British government responded to the emergence of the Omicron variant by reintroducing travel restrictions.

Both Munster and Cardiff have players still in Cape Town after contracting the virus, while the remainder of their travelling parties including coaches and support staff plus the entire Scarlets squad and management are currently isolating.

EPCR extended the deadline for registering an unlimited number of additional players until midday on Wednesday and Munster have stated their intention to fulfill their fixture with Wasps by using the Ireland internationals who were rested for the South African trip plus academy players.

In addition, those staff and players cleared from quarantine at midnight on Saturday may be added to the bench at late notice.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, both Welsh regions have scarcer resources so it is no surprise that several reports have suggested that Scarlets looked to have their second-tier game against Bristol postponed.

Meanwhile Cardiff, who only returned from South Africa on Saturday, appear to face the toughest task of the three when they face defending champions Toulouse live on Channel Four on Saturday.

The result of any conceded games will be 28-0 should any of the teams decide it cannot field a team.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search