Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

EPCR statement: Johnny Sexton banned

DUBLIN, IRELAND - MAY 20: Jonathan Sexton reacts after the Heineken Champions Cup Final between Leinster Rugby and Stade Rochelais at Aviva Stadium on May 20, 2023 in Dublin, Ireland. (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Ireland flyhalf and captain Johnny Sexton has been handed a three-game ban by the European Professional Club Rugby (EPCR) following his outbursts towards referee Jaco Peyper and other match officials after Leinster’s defeat in the European Champions Cup Final.

ADVERTISEMENT

The incident took place on May 20 at Dublin’s Aviva Stadium, where Leinster suffered a narrow 27-26 loss to La Rochelle.

Despite being sidelined due to a groin injury, Sexton entered the pitch after the match and engaged in what appeared to be a heated exchange with Peyper and the officials. As a result, EPCR launched a misconduct complaint against the 37-year-old flyhalf and Leinster, citing a lack of reasonable control over their player.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The EPCR conducted a “thorough investigation” and review of Sexton’s actions before submitting the misconduct complaints. The complaints prompted an independent disciplinary panel chaired by Christopher Quinlan KC, which Sexton appeared before via video conference call on Thursday.

The ban means that Sexton will be unavailable for all of Ireland’s Rugby World Cup warm-up matches.  Ireland is scheduled to face Italy on August 5 in their opening warm-up game, followed by matches against England and Samoa later in the month.

An independent disciplinary committee found Sexton had been “confrontational and aggressive” towards referee Jaco Peyer and his team of officials following the final whistle being blown at Aviva Stadium.

European Professional Club Rugby [EPCR] said in a statement: “Johnny Sexton admitted misconduct. The disciplinary committee found his behaviour confrontational and aggressive towards and disrespectful of the match officials.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It included his pointing his finger at them and shouting at them something to this effect: ‘It’s a disgrace you guys can’t get the big decisions right’ probably accompanied by expletives ‘most likely the f-word’.

“His conduct was obviously unsportsmanlike and brought the sport of rugby union into disrepute.

“Having regard to the full circumstances of the misconduct and the mitigation which is set out in detail in the written reasons, the disciplinary committee concluded that the appropriate and proportionate sanction was an immediate suspension of three matches.”

Leinster have also been handed a suspended fine of £7,500 [€8,750].

Ireland’s first World Cup fixture against Romania is set for September 9 in Bordeaux, which Sexton will be available for.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

16 Comments
R
Roy 499 days ago

No one can be surprised, it's a disgrace but we saw it coming. No support for the refs, not trying to withhold the morals of the game. No backbone to do the right thing. He got away with it... available just in time for the WC. Surpise!

C
CT 499 days ago

EPCR has pathed the way for future abuse against officials we'll be seeing football type antics soon a very poor decision

M
Mark 499 days ago

Big bars of Leinster fudge on sale from today.
All proceeds to Johnny's retirement fund.

P
PaPaRumple 499 days ago

So Rassie makes a professional video questioning legitimate bad referee calls and he gets a year ban and is forced to make a public apology. Golden boy Johnny goes spurs his dummy out due to a result he didn't like in a game he wasn't playing and he confronts and swears at a ref on the field and he gets a 3 day ban. Now tell me world rugby isn't biased and favouring northern teams. Johnny Sextrain is a disgrace.

J
Jen 499 days ago

Meh. I have no respect for him as a player now.

L
Lou Cifer 499 days ago

World Rugby would never ban their poster boy from the RWC....absolute bloody joke!!

J
Jacque 499 days ago

Absolute DISGRACE.

B
Bruiser 499 days ago

Disgraceful, no support for the refs. He should have got 6 months

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
M.W.Keith 5 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

SA will drop? Not according to the quality of output in the last few years. Any South African will tell you that they feel more confident in the level of SA rugby than they have in years. The Springboks immediately improved when Rassie championed a global outlook on the game and the structures. Players are proud of their ability to pull contracts overseas. They are also proud to play at home. Are SA teams dominating the URC? Not exactly. Are they playing well? Absolutely. Is the national team having its greatest era ever? Undoubtedly. Will this last no? Hell no. Is that the fault of opening the selection policy? Of course not. Teams ebb and flow, there will always be winner and losers somewhere. The global standard of rugby has raised enormously. We all know ABs fans expect to be the best there ever was for all and eternity; and undoubtedly NZ will always be sitting at the high table due to rugby culture and exceptional athletes, but to suggest that allowing overseas players into the national team will automatically decrease domestic strength has no basis in reality.


But of course, this isn't my team and it's not my problem. There will always be people on either side of the fence, I just believe that closing off a national team just because a players seeks a salary elsewhere is indicative of a very limited mindset. All I hope for is for the ABs to continue being a force on the field, regardless of who plays in the jersey, so that the Springboks can continue being pushed everytime they meet each other on the field.

90 Go to comments
M
M.W.Keith 18 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Something being relevant just because someone wants to make it relevant is a bit of a logical fallacy there. Similarly, I also said that these traditional aspects of rugby need to change - rather than it being what makes the sport beautiful. It's a beautiful sport because of the long-standing rivalries and the way the game is played. However, if rugby wants to become a global sport then some old ways are going to have to update themselves for the sake of service to the sport. This is the entire point of my comment, which perhaps you missed? I really don't think that embracing the global game will turn rugby into football, let's be honest. Test is the pinnacle of rugby, unlike football where club reigns supreme. This is a culture that won't change.


You speak of four of the top five nations having closed border policies. Well, Ireland is really just Leinster and a handful of other players. Irish rugby is coming up well, but let's not pretend there is parity between clubs. If you want to eb in the national team, your best chance is to get into Dublin let alone stay in the country. England rugby? They have often been said to have one of the deepest pools and pockets in the game, so they have the potential to be healthy regardless. If they can sort out their identity anyway. But thene again, are they so healthy? Clubs closing down, extraordinary players in the prime leaving (Ribbans, Arundell et al.), it's not a great look over there. France? France is a whole different kettle of fish - no other nation in the world can claim to have such strong multi-league club rugby, so even there they have an enormous feeder culture. Besides, loads of players want to move to France for the money so it's a moot point even thinking of reasons why French players would want to leave their home country. The money is at home.


Your comment on whether or not it is worth it, considering the length of the season. This is a very fair question, one in which SA is going to have to learn the answer to over the coming seasons. But there are two points to consider here: 1) can this not create a situation whereby increased depth and rotation for player health and safety allows for more players to get game time? If Rassie can rotate 50+ players in a season and maintain a great record, then it can be done. Naturally, clubs won't have the same resources at hand but nevertheless there is a solution to be found rather than restricting the top level of the game to a smaller number of players. If rugby wants to expand its reach, it is going to have to expand its structures in order to do so. The second point is that this exact question strengthens the call for a global calendar. Get NH and SH national and club teams aligned.


However, I do think that you have missed my point. Basically, why should a player be excluded from selection just because they earn money elsewhere? Yes, it's a difficult scenario. Yes, there will have to be workarounds. But to say that "it is simpler and easier to manage" is a lazy excuse. This handling of the Mounga situation is a total farce, because there is no clear vision here. Certain players are given sabbaticals, or they sign short term contracts with foreign teams knowing that by and large their national jersey is nailed down. Why not just let them play overseas, if their jersey is so nailed down? There is no easy answer to the problems we all know that global rugby is running headlong into, but right now there seem to be a lot of cooks with a lot of their own priorities in the kitchen and something is going to have to give.

90 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Men's 15s World Player of the Year was only a two horse race World Player of the Year was only a two horse race
Search