Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

EPCR statement: Northampton eliminated from the Champions Cup

(Photo by PA)

Sunday’s match in Paris featuring Racing 92 and Northampton has become the third of the twelve planned round four Heineken Champions Cup matches to get cancelled after EPCR intervened on Saturday to scratch the game from its schedule and award the points to the French club.   

ADVERTISEMENT

A statement read: “EPCR has been informed by Northampton Saints that they have recorded a number of positive test results for Covid-19 among their tournament squad and, as a consequence, the club is not in a position to fulfil its Champions Cup round four match against Racing 92 scheduled for Sunday.

“The Pool A fixture at Paris La Defense Arena is therefore regrettably cancelled with Racing 92 awarded the match on a 28-0, five-match points basis in accordance with the tournament rules.

Video Spacer

Rob Kearney and Alfie Barbeary – a Lion and Wasp

Video Spacer

Rob Kearney and Alfie Barbeary – a Lion and Wasp

“EPCR would like to acknowledge the efforts of both clubs to fulfil the fixture and would also like to reiterate that awarding the match to Racing 92 is a tournament management measure with the objective of ensuring that all fixtures in the 2021/22 Champions Cup are accounted for, and not a sanction.”

The decision put Racing five points clear at the top of Pool A and all but guaranteed them the top seeding from that group for the round of 16 as Ulster would have to beat Clermont in Belfast by a cricket score on Saturday to deny them top billing.

Racing versus Northampton is the third round four match to fall foul of cancellation and the decision has extinguished the hopes of Northampton qualifying for the round of 16 stage of the tournament as they needed to win in Paris and hope some other results went their way in order for them to progress. The Saints tweeted, “Best wishes for the rest of your season” shortly after Racing had posted, “Dear Northampton Saints, we wish a quick recovery to those affected. Good luck.”

Elsewhere, the Pool B Saturday matches that were to feature Leicester versus Bordeaux and Toulouse versus Cardiff were both cancelled on Friday. While there was no dissension over the Leicester cancellation as both clubs involved were qualified and Leicester will now finish as that group’s top seed, there was uproar in Toulouse that they were told they couldn’t play despite naming what they insisted was a fit and healthy matchday 23.

ADVERTISEMENT

With Cardiff awarded a 28-0 win, the defending champions threatened legal action against EPCR as the decision to give all five-match points to the Welsh region put the qualification of Toulouse for the round of 16 stage in jeopardy and they needed a last-gasp try from Harlequins to ensure Castres didn’t get the win in London that would have elevated them above their French rivals.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search