Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

EPCR statement: Reprieve for Bristol after London Irish suspension

Bristol's Ellis Genge (Photo by Harry Trump/Getty Images)

Pat Lam’s Bristol have been handed a Heineken Champions Cup reprieve as the Bears have been awarded the place in the 2023/24 tournament left vacant following the RFU suspension of London Irish.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Exiles were suspended on Tuesday from all competitions next season due to their inability to guarantee funding and owner Mick Crossan placed the club in administration the next day.

Led by director of rugby Declan Kidney, Irish had finished in fifth place last month when the 2022/23 Gallagher Premiership concluded, qualifying them for what would have been a second successive season in EPCR’s premier cup competition.

Video Spacer

Delaney Burns reveals her England Rugby call up | Up Close

Video Spacer

Delaney Burns reveals her England Rugby call up | Up Close

However, with the RFU pulling the plug on their participation, their place has now gone to ninth-place Bristol. They lost out on Champions Cup qualification on the final day of the regular season on points difference to Bath, who recorded a massive win against an understrength Saracens XV.

A statement read: “Following the RFU’s decision to suspend London Irish from all competitions, EPCR can clarify that regrettably, the club will not compete in the 2023/24 Champions Cup.

Related

“As Bristol Bears are the highest-ranked club in the Gallagher Premiership league table at the conclusion of the regular season which did not qualify for the 2023/24 Champions Cup, they will now replace London Irish in next season’s tournament.

“The formats for the 2023/24 Champions Cup and EPCR Challenge Cup will be announced shortly, as will details of the pool draws for both tournaments.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa v British & Irish Lions | 2009 | Second Test | The Vaults

Matches 27 - 28 | Rugby Premier League | Full Day Replay

Hyderabad Heroes vs Delhi Redz | Match 28 | Rugby Premier League | Full Match Replay

England XV v France XV | Full Match Replay

"The Opportunity Of A Lifetime" | Wallabies All In: Episode 1

Are these the best ever Lions performances?

Pollock Loses Bill, Players Meet Their Roommates & Training in Portugal | Ep 1: The Ultimate Test

Top 10 inspiring Lions speeches

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

R
Red and White Dynamight 10 minutes ago
Scott Robertson opens up on drama surrounding Bongi Mbonambi's knock-on try

Well you wont read about it in Rapport.


Erasmus was banned twice. Both times for attacking referees. Despite serving a 12mth ban for attacking Nic Berry, within a short time he was also attacking Wayne Barnes. Both times using social media thereby directing fans vitriol directly at Barnes and his family (death threats etc); the WR (2nd ban) was suspended from attending SA’S matches “all matchday activities” vs Italy and England (2022) but also, specifically, from “engagement with media and social media in relation to match officials”.


Both incidents as Head coach of an international team (thereby under WR)


Dave Rennie was NOT banned by WR

Michael Cheika was NOT banned by WR

Eddie Jones was NOT banned by WR.


Erasmus has been banned TWICE at Test level. He knows what he’s doing. To do so once is bad enough, to be banned a 2nd time soon thereafter and with specific terms is arrogant and nothing less than cheating.


Graham Henry filed a report to IRB (now WR) 1 year after the RWC 2007 regarding the AB loss to France. This process followed the rules set down by the sport’s governing body. It was dealt with via the agreed and proper channels and was not released for public consumption. To argue that Erasmus didnt know what he was doing, 10+ years later, is treating fans and opposition teams, players and officials as idiots. He was directly attacking referees with the intention of pressuring them to benefit the Springboks.


Everyone understands that SARU, its coaches, players and fans dont care how they win as long as they do. Nothing has changed since they had their own referees controlling Springbok Tests at home. It is why fans even feel compelled to also attack the referee, physically (the fat pig who attacked D.McHugh). All other teams are working within the system, showing respect to match officials and, thereby, opposition teams. Only 1 Head Coach has been banned once at Test level. And twice. Why do you think Erasmus didnt get WR Coach of the Year ? you wont find the answer in Rapport.

62 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Aussies have reacted to first exposure to Henry Pollock How the Aussies have taken first exposure to Henry Pollock
Search