Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

EPCR statement: Tom O'Toole red card and Michael Lowry warning

(Photo by Piaras Ó Mídheach/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

An independent EPCR disciplinary hearing has banned prop Tom O’Toole for three matches and issued a warning to full-back Michael Lowry following this month’s Heineken Champions Cup elimination for Ulster at the hands of Toulouse. The Irish province carried a six-point first-leg lead into their Belfast rematch with the defending champions. 

ADVERTISEMENT

However, they failed to protect that advantage, losing out on a 50-49 aggregate after a 75th-minute converted try from Antoine Dupont proved decisive in a match where O’Toole was red-carded ten minutes earlier and Lowry was involved in an incident with Thomas Ramos.

An EPCR statement read: “The Ulster replacement prop, Tom O’Toole, has been suspended for three weeks following an independent disciplinary hearing arising from his club’s Heineken Champions Cup round of 16 second leg match against Toulouse at the Kingspan Stadium.

Video Spacer

Leo Cullen unpacks the challenge of preparing Leinster for two major competitions simultaneously

Video Spacer

Leo Cullen unpacks the challenge of preparing Leinster for two major competitions simultaneously

“O’Toole was sent off by the referee, Matthew Carley (England), in the 65th minute of the match for tackling the Toulouse back row, Anthony Jelonch, in a dangerous manner in contravention of law 9.13.

“The independent disciplinary committee comprising Gareth Graham (England, chair), Marcello d’Orey (Portugal) and Martyn Wood (England) considered video imagery of the incident and heard submissions from O’Toole, who accepted the red card decision, from the Ulster director of rugby operations, Bryn Cunningham, and from the EPCR disciplinary officer, Liam McTiernan. 

Related

“The committee upheld the red card decision, finding that in executing a tackle in a dangerous manner, O’Toole had made contact with Jelonch’s head. It then determined that the offending was at the mid-range of World Rugby’s sanctions and six weeks was selected as the appropriate entry point. 

“Due to the player’s guilty plea and clear disciplinary record, and as there were no aggravating factors, it was decided to grant the full 50 per cent mitigation and the committee reduced the sanction by three weeks before imposing a three-week suspension. O’Toole is free to play on Monday, May 9. However, if he applies for and completes a World Rugby coaching intervention, he will be free to play next Monday, May 2.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Meanwhile, Ulster’s Michael Lowry has been issued with a citing commissioner warning for making contact with the Toulouse full-back, Thomas Ramos, in the air in a dangerous manner in the 60th minute of the match in contravention of law 9.17. The match citing commissioner was Danae Zamboulis (Greece).”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What should be on a rugby Christmas wish list for 2025? What should be on a rugby Christmas wish list for 2025?
Search