1
Erasmus and his lawyers' shock request to World Rugby over misconduct hearing
By Ian Cameron
Springboks Director of Rugby Rassie Erasmus and his legal council want World Rugby to make his misconduct hearing open to the public, a request the governing body have refused.
ADVERTISEMENT
It’s the latest twist in the now long-running saga between the outspoken DoR and World Rugby, a dispute that kicked off after the Erasmus made a 62-minute long video detailing the refereeing failings of Nic Berry and his officials during the first British & Irish Lions Test in Cape Town in July.
Erasmus claimed he and his team were unable to air their grievances with Berry following the game.
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The Video Cloud video was not found.
Error Code: VIDEO_CLOUD_ERR_VIDEO_NOT_FOUND
Session ID: 2025-05-19:4769be7e87aaa11f0f262b Player Element ID: brightcove-embedded-video
Earlier this week World Rugby confirmed that the Rassie Erasmus and SA Rugby misconduct hearing will take place over the weekend of 30-31 October, three months on from the release of the now notorious video on social media.
It is expected that Erasmus’ defence will argue that the DoR did not release the video into the public sphere, among other defences to the charge.
Independent Judicial Panel Chairman Christopher Quinlan QC will chair the panel alongside Nigel Hampton QC and Judge Mike Mika (both of New Zealand).
A World Rugby statement this week clarified: “Following the provision of detailed written submissions and evidence from Mr Erasmus, SA Rugby and World Rugby, a request was received from SA Rugby and Mr Erasmus for an oral hearing, which has been granted.”
ADVERTISEMENT
As is the norm in such cases, the disciplinary committee will publish a full written decision following the completion of the entire proceedings.
However, Erasmus’s lawyer, Frikkie Erasmus told Afrikaans newspaper Rapport they want the hearing to be made available to the public and not doing so creates needless ‘secrecy’.
‘The allegations against Rassie are unfounded and the facts will be revealed during the hearing,” Frikkie Erasmus told Rapport. “It is therefore in the interest of justice to have a transparent hearing. There is no justification for any secrecy.”
Rassie wrote earlier this week on Twitter: “So lekka! This is what we all deserve, players, coaches, supporters and referees: just to get an opportunity to tell the truth without an option of hiding anything! That’s all! Then anyone can make an informed decision on facts! The way it should be!”
ADVERTISEMENT
So lekka !! This is what we all deserve, players ,coaches , supporters and referees: just to get an opportunity to tell the truth without an option of hiding anything!! Thats all!! Then anyone can make and informed decision on facts !! The way it should be!!
— Rassie Erasmus (@RassieRugby) October 7, 2021
Erasmus faces a Regulation 19 charge over the content of the video. World Rugby – who expected to come down hard on Erasmus should he be found guilty – wrote when the charges were brought that: “Match officials are the backbone of the sport, and without them there is no game. World Rugby condemns any public criticism of their selection, performance or integrity which undermines their role, the well-established and trust-based coach-officials feedback process, and more importantly, the values that are at the heart of the sport.
“Having conducted a full review of all the available information, World Rugby is concerned that individuals from both teams have commented on the selection and/or performance of match officials.
“However, the extensive and direct nature of the comments made by Rassie Erasmus within a video address, in particular, meets the threshold to be considered a breach of World Rugby Regulation 18 (Misconduct and Code of Conduct) and will now be considered by an independent disciplinary panel.”
High time WR is exposed from there secret ways of dealing with issues like the Rassie one. My brother is a rugby coach and he confirmed that the rugby rules and the implementing of that is killing the game rugby.
There is no standardization on the way each referee read and interpret the rules .This is unfair to the rugby world and I am fully behind Rassie for once and for all expose the WR secret society.
Why is it ok for referees to make 26 mistakes in a game of that level and get away with it. Lets once and for all have a publics hearing and let WR sort out the impossible to implement rules like high tackles (my goly one referee give a red car for the players finger that touch the other players cheek, another ref gives for
same scenario only a penalty. really its rugby everything happens at a fast pace.) , red cards that don't belong in 30 man contact sport.
Its unfair to the spectators that pay to see 30 men play and to the team .Why penalize the team for one players mistake. There are more than 100 rules just for the lineouts ,my goodness really .No wonder referees don't know how to correctly and fairly referee the game.
The rules in the scrums is a joke ,most of the time the ref don't even see what's happening on the other side of the scrum . Why not call up the line ref for a scrum to oversee the blind side. My point WR is for ages manipulating the game ,rules ,players, couches and directors with there secretive ways .
For me Rassie is the only director that have the balls to take on the WR union. Bet you many other directors is applauding this move of Rassie. High time the rules and way its implemented change. If not rugby will die as n world sport. What I don't get is why a hearing to penalize Rassie for exposing this flaws in the rules and refereeing of the game.
Why not rather sit down with all the directors and together work to improve the game by listening to the head coaches and directors. Change the rules if its not working ,why defending yourself WR. Make the rules better and the refereeing faire.
But no they want to show the world they are in charge and no one dares to take them on. We live in the 21 century no space for secret organizations that do what they want. Go Rassie.
This thing is becoming a farce because WR taking all the time in the world. If this was against a Pacific islander, no hearing just direct ban for 2 years...the longer this drags the more WR os allowing trial by media
Which Islander has been banned for 2 years?