Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

European clubs point finger of blame in global calendar discussions

(Photo By Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

European club rugby chiefs insist they are not blocking moves to thrash out a new global calendar season and believe World Rugby has failed to recognise the potential massive losses the northern hemisphere game faces without an agreed new structure.

ADVERTISEMENT

NZ Rugby chief executive Mark Robinson has criticised the unwillingness for change from English and French clubs, saying: “We had have hoped that they might come to the table with a little more compromise.”

However, RugbyPass have been told that the southern hemisphere unions only discovered the full extent of the work that has been undertaken by the French Top 14 (LNR), Guinness PRO14 and England’s Premiership (PRL) clubs at Monday’s virtual meeting involving more than 50 people, including England captain Owen Farrell and ex-All Black Conrad Smith representing the international players.

Video Spacer

RugbyPass brings you footage of a young Jonah Lomu in action during his New Zealand school days

Video Spacer

RugbyPass brings you footage of a young Jonah Lomu in action during his New Zealand school days

The French clubs put forward their view of a new global calendar in which the July window for Test matches is retained and the club season runs from September to July. The French plan would also mean the Six Nations is shortened from seven to six weeks and the Champions Cup from nine to eight weeks. 

With no agreement at Monday’s meeting, the decision to move the July Test window to October this year is subject to a vote at the World Rugby council on June 30. What frustrated the European clubs at the meeting was “short-termism”, with the main focal point the looming October and November Test window which the major unions want to ensure is played to generate much-needed cash. 

Under the planned Test schedule, England would play a seven-Test programme facing Italy and two Tests in Japan and return to Twickenham for games with New Zealand, Argentina, Tonga and Australia – travel restrictions permitting.

Heineken Champions Cup organisers are confident their quarter-finals and semi-finals will be played in September, with the final going ahead in October prior to the Test window.

ADVERTISEMENT

The French and English clubs do not believe World Rugby fully understood that “hundreds of millions of pounds of revenue” was at stake for them under proposed changes to the global game, with that figure dwarfing the combined losses the major unions are facing from the pandemic lockdown.

A leading European source told RugbyPass: “To be told that we need to make decisions about the future of the sport in the next four to six weeks when there is so much work that needs to be undertaken is difficult to comprehend. 

“World Rugby should have admitted in their statement after the meeting that there were gaps in their knowledge about the impact the proposed changes would have on a large segment of the game. Therefore, we need an urgent review of the impact on revenue, fans and the sport that this will have for the club game in the northern hemisphere.

“There was a serious and in-depth sharing of information – mainly by the French clubs – during the meeting and that has caused everyone to think and ask for reports to enable everyone making these major decisions to have a balanced view. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“Everyone will need to compromise and to be honest there needs to be a complete governance shift by World Rugby with the club game allowed to govern itself. The southern hemisphere just talked about getting international games played this year.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING George Skivington issues injury update on prop duo George Skivington issues injury update on prop duo
Search