Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Even your own mother dumped you' - Brian Moore showcases vile message sent to him by Twitter troll

BBC rugby pundit Brian Moore has revealed a vile message sent to him by a critic on Twitter.

ADVERTISEMENT

The former England hooker is known for his outspoken punditry and his no-holds barred approach to social media.

His tweeting is not limited to rugby union and he often gets involved in Twitter discussions on many topics from current affairs to sport.

This evening Moore posted the following Tweet after receiving a reply from the poster in question: “You post inaccurate and illogical bollocks all the time. I know which I prefer.”

Moore initially retweeted a message from the account, but the account holder deleted his post before apparently deleting his entire Twitter account.

“Yes, I had a difficult upbringing but then again, I achieved a few things along the way. No insult you can throw will change that.”

Seeing the account had deleted the offensive message, Moore posted the message again, which he had saved. “Sean, as you didn’t have the balls to stand by your words and deleted them, I saved them for you.

ADVERTISEMENT

‘Little willy Brian cannot keep a wife, 3 so far and even you’re own mother dumped you.’

Last week Moore launched a rousing defence of his commentating style after copping flak from critics on the social media platform.

The former England hooker was accused of ‘slagging’ off England and of having an old fashioned style of commentary. The unabashed pundit didn’t hold back in defending his approach, and was largely supported by his many followers.

It all started when one Tweeter posted: “You all ready to start slagging England off from the first kick [?].

ADVERTISEMENT

Moore responded in kind, saying that he would continue to call it as he sees it.

“I’m ready to say exactly what I see; if England are good I’ll say so; if they’re not I’ll also say so. It’s not my job to ‘get behind the team.”

“To those saying my analysis is old-fashioned – it isn’t but it is simple. Know why? Because out of an audience of 7-8m, all but 1m know very little about rugby & they need simple explanations. If the choice is boring supposed experts and informing them; I choose them.”

He was supported by plenty of rugby’s Twitterati.

Paul Morgan, Communications Director at Premiership Rugby, said: “One thing you can never accuse Brian of is not calling it as he sees it … disagree with his views by all means but he always calls it exactly as he sees it – good or bad…”

A British and Irish Lion of two tours, Moore won 64 caps for England between 1987 and 1995.

WATCH: Jim Hamilton is joined by good friend and England International Freddie Burns to discuss the selection issues England face and Andy Farrell’s slip up in a recent press conference.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search