Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England fans are all saying the same thing about Red Roses loss

Red Roses players at Eden Park - PA

Gutted is the go-to word on the lips of English rugby this morning. The Red Roses, hot favourites for the tournament, lost 34-31 to New Zealand in the final of the Women’s Rugby World Cup in Auckland.

ADVERTISEMENT

A red for Lydia Thompson proved crucial but other issues throughout hurt England, not least a lost lineout that if gathered, could well have seen the Red Roses steal the win in the dying moments of the game.

England head coach Simon Middleton admitted in a post-match interview, that while he was proud of his players, not winning the competition was a failure for his charges in terms of their goal.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

English rugby didn’t know quite how to react on social.

Women’s rugby commentator and pundit Nick Heath wrote: “Tear in my eye tells me I was more invested in these Red Roses than even I realised. Spent a lot of time with those players and I’m truly gutted for them and everything they’ve invested. Hats off to the hosts. An incredible journey under Wayne Smith. Congrats to them.”

Topsy Ojo wrote: “Gutted for the #RedRoses. Heartbreak, gave it everything. Congratulations NZ, incredible performance and some turnaround over the 11 months.”

The official England Rugby Twitter account summed things up well, posting: “Sport can be tough, but we’re still proud of our Red Roses. You gave it your all. Hold your heads high.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Jesus, what a game,” wrote RPA Chairman Ethan Waller. “Absolutely gutted for the Red Roses. What a performance with 14 players for the majority of time, and in it for the full 80.”

“I feel exhausted after all that,” wrote one England fan. “An unbelievable game and proof that women’s sport continues its ascent. So disappointed for the #redroses but to hang on with a player down for over 50 mins was amazing & I hope they feel as proud as I do!”

Elliott Butlin wrote: “Oh sport, you’re so so cruel. Absolutely heartbreaking for the Red Roses. They’ve done us all proud. Gutted for them all.”

Another fan said she preferred the Women’s team to Eddie Jones’ men’s side. “Absolutely gutted for the Red Roses, they played until the very end and gave their all. Personally I’d rather watch the ladies then the England Rugby men at the moment.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Even Wales fans were commiserating. “Unbelievably heartbreaking. What a final,” wrote Squidge Rugby.

England will no doubt go back to the drawing board, with an eye to 2025.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

10 Comments
t
thomas 738 days ago

I am struggling to understand why the TMO is heard to make the call for Lydia Thompson to get a red card ??? I thought it was the Referee's decision. And why was there a New Zealand official in the TMO's box acting as a Technical Advisor.
Lydia was attempting to tackle Woodman and had made a run assuming Woodman would keep to the touchline, but Woodman moved in field stopping Lydia dead. Woodman ran into her, and there was a clash of head's something Lydia could do nothing about. So why did the TMO give a red ??

T
Tomasi 769 days ago

Red Roses will be tough to beat come '25 WRWC on home soil

A
Al 769 days ago

sunshine i did watch the whole tournament and the ferns delt with Welsh and French the same way with strength and to cut a long story short a game plan not one dimensional and if the roses had so many injuries maybe the replacement. anyway sometimes the truth can hurt i do apologies

A
Allan 769 days ago

Not ONE English commentator thinks that the Black Ferns simply out-thought, out ran, and out-pointed the English team. Speed, agility, guile, ball skills, and sheer TOUGHNESS are what won the Final for the Black Ferns. They are superb. The English have played one-dimensional rugby for so long that it's now almost entrenched in their DNA, and when an opposition plays completely another free-spirited way, the Poms have no idea of how to cope with it. Wayne Smith is an absolute genius, and his girls played like the Grim Reaper was chasing them - they left it ALL on the field. Congratulations ladies - your names will now be household words around the whole of New Zealand!!

W
Wayne 770 days ago

As a Kiwi I still feel empathy for the English. This test could have gone either way - it spun on a pin. It's hard being the favourites coming into a sudden death tournament - an extra burden for them to carry. We Kiwis should know. Just ask an All Black team that's gone to a World Cup as favourites and come home empty handed. Sports a funny old thing.

J
Jackson 770 days ago

Great game Ladies. Disappointed with the English Style/game plan
Why didn't you run it like the Kiwi ladies did, that's what Rugby Union is all about, its not the Northern Hemisphere crash bash stuff. Really enjoyed the whole 90 + minutes

G
Graham 770 days ago

As a Kiwi and loving the result I would say to English viewers, be disappointed for the Red Roses, do NOT be disappointed in them

A
Al 770 days ago

i watch the game and was proud of the black ferns for when it came down to genuine rugby the ferns did win it they had the fleer pure and speed and skill for 80min while the roses had by far brute strength and if i want to witness a game of train carriages and how many are towing it i will know where to go. 30 games unbeaten is an amazing feet congratulations but maybe now Simon you will add some fleer and speed into your game

P
Peter 770 days ago

No risk, no reward.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search