Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Everyone is saying the same thing about the Manu Tuilagi incident

Manu Tuilagi looks on as Tommy Allan is treated - PA

Many rugby fans are questioning how Sale Sharks centre Manu Tuilagi went unpunished for a collision with Tommy Allan in his side’s Gallagher Premiership win over Harlequins yesterday evening.

ADVERTISEMENT

Allan left the field on a stretcher after receiving lengthy treatment following a collision with Tuilagi at the Stoop. The England midfielder appeared to tuck his arm in moments before the contact was made with the Italian flyhalf, who had fallen to the ground after attempting to collect a high ball.

Referee Wayne Barnes ruled that the incident was a ‘rugby collision’ although some fans were unclear why Tuilagi found himself barrelling into Allan shoulder first with no apparent attempt to wrap his arms, even if he was pulling out of a tackle.

Video Spacer

Being Barbarians – Rugby Documentary

Our new rugby documentary follows Scott Robertson and Ronan O’Gara in a brand new saga following the Barbarians rugby team, one of the most famous sides in the world. In this clash, they take on New Zealand XV.

Video Spacer

Being Barbarians – Rugby Documentary

Our new rugby documentary follows Scott Robertson and Ronan O’Gara in a brand new saga following the Barbarians rugby team, one of the most famous sides in the world. In this clash, they take on New Zealand XV.

At the time of publishing Tuilagi had not been cited by the RFU.

Journalist Chris Jones wrote: “Have to hope Tommy Allan is ok. Rugby collision rules Wayne Barnes but doesn’t look great from Tuilagi.”

Welsh journalist Gareth Axenderrie wrote: “England’s 12 in a hugely dangerous high tackle incident 2 days after England’s 10 was. Neither even penalised. The issue here isn’t ‘intent’. The issue here is Tuilagi has no control. At full speed. Makes contact with Allen’s head who doesn’t have the ball and is defenceless.”

“Surely that kind of collision is exactly what rugby is trying to get rid of?” wrote one fan. “Tuilagi being committed isn’t really an excuse if you fly in like a missile.”

“How Manu Tuilagi and Farrell didn’t get red cards this weekend is bonkers,” wrote another fan. “BT Sport not even highlighting the Tuilagi hit! Under doctors orders after the trial by tv comment by Healy!”

ADVERTISEMENT

Some even suggested that the approaching Guinness Six Nations suggested that England players tend to get the rub of the green in these incidents ahead of the tournament.

Former Welsh prop Lee Jarvis posted: “Farrell shoulder to the head yesterday. Nothing Manu Tuilagi shoulder to the head today. Nothing. 6 nations starts in a few weeks. That’s why.”

Others defended Tuilagi, one fan observing: “Surprised so many people digging Tuilagi out over this. Allan is falling over and that’s caused the contact with head. His head is at waist level. How is Tuilagi meant to anticipate that? This isn’t the same as some of the others we have seen.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The Maul Over Rugby Pod described it as a faux outrage: “If anything Tuilagi is trying to pull out of this and has no time to change any of his movements on a sodden pitch that wouldn’t allow quick change of direction. But why let that stop the narrative. This faux outrage is a huge part of the problem.”

Harlequins head coach Tabai Matson said of the injury to Allan: “Tommy looks pretty good, it was precautionary.”

England teammate Owen Farrell will face a panel of his hit on Gloucester’s Jack Clermont. Farrell’s hearing will take place tomorrow evening (Tuesday 10 January) and will be heard by an independent disciplinary panel chaired by Philip Evans with Becky Essex and Mitch Read. If banned, he could miss the start of the Six Nations.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
T
Thomas 711 days ago

Not sure if Tuilagi goes out to injure others or just himself so he can chill on the sideline for a few more weeks

P
Poe 712 days ago

Are refs impartial or just freaking blind.

P
Poorfour 712 days ago

I think WB is probably right about Tuilagi - but that O'Flaherty should have seen a card for causing the collision. He jumps into the path of Allan, makes contact in the air with no realistic chance of securing the ball and causes Allan to come down in a way that puts him straight in Tuilagi's path.

It's probably not something that could be cited as it doesn't reach the criteria for a potential red card, but I was disappointed that Barnes didn't at least look at it.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search