Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Everything you need to know ahead of the Pacific Nations Cup final

Frank Lomani of Fiji and Malo Tuitama of Japan. Photo by LEON LORD/AFP via Getty Images and PHILIP FONG/AFP via Getty Images

Four of the Pacific’s heavyweights are set to collide in Osaka on Saturday in a doubleheader that will decide the Pacific Nations Cup podium.

ADVERTISEMENT

For Manu Samoa and the USA, it’s a chance to finish competitive campaigns on a high and prove they are tracking well in this new World Cup cycle.

For the finalists, Japan and Fiji, the title is on the line and there will be plenty of heart on display as the teams chase the title of Pacific kings.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Here’s everything you need to know ahead of the Asahi Super Dry Pacific Nations Cup final round, available to watch on RugbyPass TV in select territories.

Samoa vs USA

Where: Hanazono Rugby Stadium, Osaka
When: 16:00 local time, Saturday, September 21

The third-place final sees the team with the most tackles in the tournament, the USA, come up against the team with as many defenders beaten as any team in Manu Samoa.

While both were, in the end, comfortably dismissed by their semi-final opponents, these two teams have some star power across the matchday 23, with Samoa’s No. 8 Iakopo Petelo-Mapu claiming a round-high 25 tackles against Japan and his USA counterpart Jamason Fa’anana-Schultz leading the competition in average carries per 80 minutes.

There have been just seven Test matches total between these two nations, with USA winning the most recent two and Samoa winning the first five.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Fiji vs Japan

Where: Hanazono Rugby Stadium, Osaka
When: 19:05 local time, Saturday, September 21

Get your popcorn ready, this is going to be fun. Both of these teams boast exhausting attacks that promise to make this final an Osaka spectacle.

Both sides scored over 90 points over their two pool games, and Japan backed that up with a 49-point outing against Samoa in the semi-final while Fiji overcame a rapid start from the USA, flexing their muscles defensively to claim a 22-3 win and advance to the final.

Japan leads the tournament in the majority of statistical categories in both attack and defence while their set-piece also rates highly. Fiji claims the top spot in key categories like defenders beaten, turnovers won and opposition 22m entries.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both sides employ dual-playmaker attacks, with young stars in the making familiar to the N0. 10 jersey playing at fullback behind a more experienced campaigner at flyhalf.

For Fiji, it’s Caleb Muntz leading the attack with assistance from Isaiah Armstrong-Ravula. For Japan, veteran Harumichi Tatekawa is backed up by perhaps the competition’s MVP to date in Seungsin Lee at fullback.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search