Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ex-All Black backs Ian Foster for World Cup contract extension

(Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

A former All Black believes New Zealand head coach Ian Foster has shown he is worthy of a contract extension beyond this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Foster is off-contract with New Zealand Rugby [NZR] at the end of 2021 after beating out Crusaders boss Scott Robertson for the All Blacks job following the 2019 World Cup.

The decision to appoint Foster brought with it plenty of scepticism from the New Zealand public, as many felt Robertson deserved the role given his glittering coaching career at age-grade, provincial and Super Rugby level.

Video Spacer

Has Foster done enough for a contract extension? | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Video Spacer

Has Foster done enough for a contract extension? | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Since becoming Crusaders head coach in 2017, Robertson has guided the Christchurch-based franchise to five straight Super Rugby and Super Rugby Aotearoa titles.

They add to his eight provincial championships with Canterbury and 2015 World Rugby U20 Championship crown with the New Zealand U20 side.

By comparison, Foster was seen as someone with an underwhelming CV as a head coach, whose best result at the helm of any team came in 2009 when he guided the Chiefs to the Super 14 final, only to get thumped 61-17 by the Bulls in Pretoria.

However, NZR backed the 56-year-old after his eight-year service as an assistant to ex-head coach Sir Steve Hansen between 2012 and 2019, the early part of which time the All Blacks enjoyed one of their most successful periods ever.

ADVERTISEMENT

But, after a World Cup title in 2015, three Rugby Championships, four Bledisloe Cup series wins and an undefeated campaign in 2013, things began to unravel towards the end of Hansen’s and Foster’s reign as head and assistant coaches of the All Blacks.

Two defeats to both Ireland and the Wallabies, a draw and a loss at home to the Springboks, a series draw with the British and Irish Lions and a fortuitous win over England between 2016 and 2019 set alarm bells ringing going into the 2019 World Cup.

There, the team’s worst fears were realised as England avenged their defeat at Twickenham the year beforehand to nullify the All Blacks in a display of supreme physicality to knock the Kiwis out with a 19-7 victory in their semi-final clash in Japan.

Unable to find a way through the unrelenting pressure applied by the English forward pack, doubts were cast over Foster’s feasibility as All Blacks head coach when it was revealed he would be running for the role.

ADVERTISEMENT

Some All Blacks fans yearned for a fresh perspective in the national team’s coaching group, and they felt Robertson – the innovative and eccentric, yet brilliant, former All Blacks loose forward – could offer that.

Furthermore, the retention of Foster was viewed by some as a continuation of the work done by Hansen, which unsettled those who held that view given the troublesome results the All Blacks endured leading into and during the World Cup.

Those concerns grew when the All Blacks achieved a winning ratio of just 50 per cent in Foster’s debut season as the team’s head coach last year.

Despite winning the Tri-Nations and retaining the Bledisloe Cup, a draw and loss to the Wallabies, as well as a first-ever defeat to Argentina, did little to win Foster more fans.

A report from the New Zealand Herald brought those issues to the fore again last week, albeit from a different standpoint, when it was revealed All Blacks players have grown frustrated at NZR for not extending Foster’s contract beyond this season.

The Herald reported that while Foster has won the support of his players to remain onboard as All Blacks head coach through until the 2023 World Cup, NZR is eager to see more from him before the end of the year.

None of Foster’s assistants have been granted contract extensions beyond this year either, and frustrations from the coaching group have reportedly grown after NZR extended Robertson’s contract until 2024.

Robertson’s deal with the national union comes complete with an opt-out clause to apply for the All Blacks job should it become available.

In spite of the uncertainty surrounding his long-term future, Foster delivered the best performance of his brief All Blacks head coaching stint last weekend, a day after the Herald‘s report was published.

The 57-22 thrashing of the Wallabies at Eden Park was the most comprehensive display of Foster’s tenure, and while he is still yet to face one of rugby’s current powerhouse nations, such as South Africa, France or Wales, the result certainly would have given NZR some food for thought.

Speaking on the Aotearoa Rugby Pod following the result, former All Blacks hooker James Parsons weighed in on the matter as he spoke in favour of retaining Foster beyond this season.

Parsons, who played two tests under Foster during his time as All Blacks assistant coach between 2014 and 2016, suggested a change to the make-up of New Zealand’s coaching staff at this stage of a World Cup cycle could be detrimental to the team.

“I think you’ve got to give confidence in the group and the way they’re trending,” he told the Aotearoa Rugby Pod.

“I just think of it this way, if you make a change, say at the end of this year, if a new coaching group is in there, there’ll be system changes, there’ll be all sorts of changes, and then you’re into a World Cup.”

Parsons added the way in which the All Blacks have conducted themselves amid the unprecedented challenge forced upon them by Covid-19 has been “first-class” and deserves recognition.

“They seem like a pretty settled squad going through a lot of challenges off the field,” he said.

“I think the leadership and control that this All Blacks leadership group and management group has shown at the moment is first-class and worthy of being acknowledged at some stage.”

The All Blacks were scheduled to play their next test against the Wallabies in the final Bledisloe Cup test of the year at Perth next weekend.

However, fresh outbreaks of the virus in New Zealand and Australia have jeopardised not only that test, but also the entire Rugby Championship.

Sources have told RugbyPass that SANZAAR is considering relocating the entire competition to the United Kingdom and Europe, with other media reports suggesting the third Bledisloe Cup could be staged at Wembley Stadium on October 9.

Other options believed to be on the cards are having the Rugby Championship held either in South Africa or Queensland.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 6 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 10 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search