Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ex-Bok Robbie Fleck addresses previous criticism of Marcus Smith

Marcus Smith/ PA

Despite only playing two matches in the Guinness Six Nations, both from the bench, Marcus Smith had some standout moments in the tournament.

ADVERTISEMENT

From his match-winning drop-goal against Ireland to his try against France, the 25-year-old made an undeniable impact as a substitute.

After watching England put in three uninspiring performances in the opening three rounds while he was out with a calf injury, the Harlequin would have wanted to show what an asset he is to England on his return, while also making a statement to some of his critics, one of which was former South Africa centre Robbie Fleck.

Video Spacer

Jaco Peyper opens up on the state of South African refereeing

Video Spacer

Jaco Peyper opens up on the state of South African refereeing

Fleck had said on RPTV’s Boks Office before England’s win over Ireland that he did not think the fly-half was the “answer” for England.

Two matches later, and two vastly improved performances by England later, Fleck returned to Boks Office and addressed those comments.

Match Summary

4
Penalty Goals
1
3
Tries
4
3
Conversions
4
0
Drop Goals
0
125
Carries
65
7
Line Breaks
7
15
Turnovers Lost
14
5
Turnovers Won
5

The 31-cap Bok qualified his statement that Smith was not the answer for England by saying he was not the answer in their style at the beginning of the Championship. He still, however, believes George Ford deserves to start for England in the No10 jersey, but said that Smith “proved his worth” from the bench.

With that said, despite playing the majority of the match against France at fullback after replacing George Furbank early in the game, neither Fleck, nor fellow Springbok Schalk Burger, see Smith as a viable starter at fullback for England moving forward.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I still say that while England were going through a transition in style of play, was he the right choice as a starting No10? The answer is no,” Fleck said.

“But he has certainly improved his worth coming off the bench. When he came on against Ireland, he just added so much flavour to the set-up. The Irish allowed him to attack.

“The drop-goal at the end, any fly-half worth his salt should have done that. But he had those subtle little changes in pace and he did one little short ball to a loose forward and he wrapped around and got into space and that put Ireland on the back foot.

“The time and space that he was given by the French was just too much and that’s when he starts to dominate.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think he’s fulfilling his role coming off the bench. But as a starter, George Ford for me was outstanding. This whole series he’s been brilliant.

“But Marcus Smith has proven his worth coming off the bench and changing the game.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
j
john 274 days ago

George Ford in his 1st 3 matches was OK but not good for me he was playing to deep and not much of a threat ,against Ireland and France he played a different game much more of a threat in the faces of there defence for me he was very good ,Marcus in his 2 appearances played really well choosing who plays 10 for England one for Borthwick and his team for me these 2 are favourites.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search