Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ex-Bok Robbie Fleck addresses previous criticism of Marcus Smith

Marcus Smith/ PA

Despite only playing two matches in the Guinness Six Nations, both from the bench, Marcus Smith had some standout moments in the tournament.

ADVERTISEMENT

From his match-winning drop-goal against Ireland to his try against France, the 25-year-old made an undeniable impact as a substitute.

After watching England put in three uninspiring performances in the opening three rounds while he was out with a calf injury, the Harlequin would have wanted to show what an asset he is to England on his return, while also making a statement to some of his critics, one of which was former South Africa centre Robbie Fleck.

Video Spacer

Jaco Peyper opens up on the state of South African refereeing

Video Spacer

Jaco Peyper opens up on the state of South African refereeing

Fleck had said on RPTV’s Boks Office before England’s win over Ireland that he did not think the fly-half was the “answer” for England.

Two matches later, and two vastly improved performances by England later, Fleck returned to Boks Office and addressed those comments.

Match Summary

4
Penalty Goals
1
3
Tries
4
3
Conversions
4
0
Drop Goals
0
125
Carries
65
7
Line Breaks
7
15
Turnovers Lost
14
5
Turnovers Won
5

The 31-cap Bok qualified his statement that Smith was not the answer for England by saying he was not the answer in their style at the beginning of the Championship. He still, however, believes George Ford deserves to start for England in the No10 jersey, but said that Smith “proved his worth” from the bench.

With that said, despite playing the majority of the match against France at fullback after replacing George Furbank early in the game, neither Fleck, nor fellow Springbok Schalk Burger, see Smith as a viable starter at fullback for England moving forward.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I still say that while England were going through a transition in style of play, was he the right choice as a starting No10? The answer is no,” Fleck said.

“But he has certainly improved his worth coming off the bench. When he came on against Ireland, he just added so much flavour to the set-up. The Irish allowed him to attack.

“The drop-goal at the end, any fly-half worth his salt should have done that. But he had those subtle little changes in pace and he did one little short ball to a loose forward and he wrapped around and got into space and that put Ireland on the back foot.

“The time and space that he was given by the French was just too much and that’s when he starts to dominate.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think he’s fulfilling his role coming off the bench. But as a starter, George Ford for me was outstanding. This whole series he’s been brilliant.

“But Marcus Smith has proven his worth coming off the bench and changing the game.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
j
john 244 days ago

George Ford in his 1st 3 matches was OK but not good for me he was playing to deep and not much of a threat ,against Ireland and France he played a different game much more of a threat in the faces of there defence for me he was very good ,Marcus in his 2 appearances played really well choosing who plays 10 for England one for Borthwick and his team for me these 2 are favourites.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'England's blanket of despair feels overdone - they are not a team in freefall' 'England's blanket of despair feels overdone - they are not a team in freefall'
Search