Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ex-Ireland player criticises return of 'proven doper' Aphiwe Dyantyi

(Photo by Steve Haag/Getty Images)

Former Ireland midfielder Gordon D’Arcy has heavily criticised the recent return of Aphiwe Dyantyi with the Sharks after the expiry of his four-year ban for doping. It was shortly before the 2019 Rugby World Cup when the then Springboks winger tested positive for multiple anabolic steroids and he was eventually banned in December 2020.

ADVERTISEMENT

The World Rugby breakthrough player of the year in 2018, who at the time was contracted to the Lions in Johannesburg, pleaded guilty but claimed he did not knowingly take a banned substance. However, the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport insisted that Dyantyi’s denials hadn’t met the burden of proof.

With his suspension now over, Dyantyi has returned to playing, making four appearances in recent weeks for the Sharks. The initial three games came on his club’s European tour to Ireland (vs Leinster), England (vs Ospreys) and Italy (vs Zebre Parma), but D’Arcy was struck by the reception that the now 29-year-old received when he made his home debut last Saturday for the Durban-based franchise.

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

“Instead of lauding the smash and grab by Connacht, it was the return of Aphiwe Dyantyi that caught the eye for me,” wrote the retired D’Arcy in his weekly Irish Times rugby column. “What really struck me was that his return was so celebrated by the home crowd and the home broadcaster.

“Dyantyi did very little of note in the game and yet he was interviewed post-match. Nobody was in the least bit sheepish or ashamed about welcoming back a proven doper.

“Time and again, South Africa’s record with this stuff is questionable, to say the least. Just this summer, their playmaker Elton Jantjies had to withdraw from the wider Springbok World Cup squad after testing positive for an anabolic steroid.

“In 2020, former South Africa hooker Mahlatse ‘Chiliboy’ Ralepelle was banned for eight years after he tested positive for a banned substance for the third time in a decade.

ADVERTISEMENT

“These aren’t obscure players. Dyantyi was World Rugby’s breakthrough player of the year in 2018. Jantjies and Ralepelle both played for the Springboks on and off for over a decade. Imagine equivalent Irish players serving long doping bans. Imagine the kind of reception they would get when they came back.

“Yet here’s Rassie Erasmus on Dyantyi earlier this summer. ‘I really hope that he comes back with a bang and he does really well for the Sharks. And I hope we can one day pick him for the Springboks again.’

“Even with the caveat that everyone deserves a second chance, this type of ringing endorsement for a proven doper contributes towards a greying culture of cheating.”

D’Arcy, who was capped 82 times by Ireland and once by the British and Irish Lions in 2005, went on to note how South Africa were threatened with having to play their recent Rugby World Cup knockout games with a ban on displaying their national flag and playing their national anthem due to their government’s non-compliance with the World Anti-Doping Agency code.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Dyantyi’s major asset is his speed… Yes, Dyantyi has served a four-year ban. But he does not lose the physical benefits of doping. His speed is artificially increased and that still gives him a comparative advantage against players who have made a decision to stay within the rules of our sport.

“South Africa won so many supporters over the last two World Cup cycles. As back-to-back world champions, they should be setting the gold standard when it comes to doping.

“Instead, they have chosen a more laissez-faire attitude to enforcement and there doesn’t seem to be a culture of condemnation. Instead, the message to young players seems to be – cheat and you will be okay. That can’t be good enough.”

  • Click here to read Gordon D’Arcy’s Irish Times column
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

42 Comments
R
Reuben 392 days ago

South Africa’s back to back world cups are built on a regime of institutional doping. Ireland and France’s recent success are also built off doping.

It is literally everywhere in professional sport.

You really think Siya could come back from what is usually a 9 month recovery after surgery, to play elite international rugby, without anabolic steroids? Physiologically impossible.

J
JL 393 days ago

It’s unfortunate that all of these players are Black/POC. It’s a complex situation due to childhood malnutrition/difficult socio-economic context, and all of this may have driven some of these players to make bad decisions. There is an obvious tinge of racism to Darcy’s comments and that is very troubling, but seems to be par for the course in Ireland’s hatred of all things South Africa. They prefer their foreigners to be from New Zealand’s North Island, like half their backline. Whether Darcy likes it or not, SA is going to give Dyanti a second chance, it cannot afford politically and morally to just consign a black player to the trash heap.

P
Peter 393 days ago

Suddenly old Gordon is an expert also lol. Who told him that the effects of the drugs remain forever. Shame

J
JJGhost 393 days ago

rugby fans around the world need to stop allowing the springboks to live rent free inside their heads… I guess they just cant handle being bested by an African team, over and over again

J
JJGhost 393 days ago

A whole article of tears because no one cared that Connacht beat the Sharks 🤣🤣🤣

s
sean 394 days ago

Hang on a second he has paid his dues for the crime he committed and those are the rules.. he was a stupid kid made a bad choice in life everyone deserves a second chance.. D’Arcy is the very definition of white privilege

J
Jan 394 days ago

Ireland rugby also don’t test schoolboys rugby players for doping. South Africa has been doing this for a very long time. NZ only starter a few years ago.

R
Rugger 394 days ago

RSA tests and banned Chilli Boy for 8 Years. This guy is now 29yrs best years behind him.

RSA catches and ban’s drug cheats, So D’Arcy’s point is what that, nobody ever tried to get ahead under dubious methods in Ireland?

The same country that gives us Connor “Roid-Bloated” McCgregor, in the fight circuit? or is it you just dont wanna catch any, and their “support’ is overseen in house.

Haskell [ENG] disappeared from Rugby for a year, came back significantly larger, all semi-pro’s told me it was known Viatmin-S played a role. But RSA who test and ban players are the drug cheats.

Rassie has to be ‘welcoming back’ especially to returning players of a deeply needed ethnic profile. Rugby is trying to win over the black populace, despite top level break throughs most have been handpicked and placed in historically dominant school rugby systems like Grey College, previously white schools. Grow up D’Arcy clown.

This is an attempt to keep an underlying thread of Boks are drug cheats, Choose a man and a time and bring a test D’Arcy, and suffer same for your Internationals, its happening already. Believe you me if their was a failed drug test under wraps or a known drug game, ENG wouldn’t have tried the Race baiting with Tom Curry they’d have gone straight to that for their smear.

Dutch Farm boys like PSDT eating meat in sunshine doing outdoor work grow tall, is this vitamin-S too? Clown.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 25 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

143 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search