Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ex-Ireland player makes 'good sign' Six Nations red card prediction

England's Charlie Ewels gets red carded in 2022 (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Former Ireland back-rower Alan Quinlan believes it would be a good sign to see red cards shown in the upcoming Guinness Six Nations, claiming that World Rugby are correct to stick with his zero-tolerance approach to eliminate headshots from the game. Safety has become a buzzword in recent times, an emphasis evident in the increased number of players sent off in the championship in recent years.

ADVERTISEMENT

Between 2000 and 2019, only six red cards were seen in the Six Nations but that number has ballooned with nine shown in the past three seasons – two in 2022, five in 2021 and two more in 2020.

England’s Charlie Ewels and Italy’s Hame Faiva were red-carded last year, Scotland’s Finn Russell and Zander Fagerson, France’s Paul Willemse and Ireland’s Peter O’Mahony and Bundee Aki all saw red in 2021, while England’s Manu Tuilagi and France’s Mohamed Haouas were given their marching orders in 2020.

Video Spacer

Steve Borthwick responds to reporter on why he didn’t start Manu Tuilagi

Video Spacer

Steve Borthwick responds to reporter on why he didn’t start Manu Tuilagi

There has been commentary that these red cards are ruining the sport as a spectacle. For instance, England had to play with 14 men for practically an entire game after Ewels was dispatched just 82 seconds into his team’s March 2022 loss to Ireland while in the previous round, the action in Dublin was reduced to uncontested scrums after sub Italian hooker Faiva was red-carded in the first half shortly after he came on as an injury replacement.

Quinlan, though, claimed that he admires the way World Rugby have refused to budge in its approach and he would have no problem with the upcoming matches witnessing some more red cards given how player safety is now of utmost importance.

Speaking on the Newstalk Hard Shoulder programme ahead of this weekend’s Six Nations round one games featuring Wales-Ireland, England-Scotland and Italy-France, the ex-Ireland forward said: “Of course, there is concern about the concussions and head knocks and all that but World Rugby have been strong in the last number of years in trying to really stick to their guns in the sense that there is zero tolerance around some of the headshots.

“There is a lot of stuff you see in southern hemisphere games and the Rugby Championship if somebody gets sent off for a head-on-head clash where you say, ‘Well, it is just a rugby collision’. You get some of that in the southern hemisphere.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I have always been speaking openly about this and saying players’ behaviours and body positions have to change and I just don’t know if the coaches are really implementing this. Defence coaches, it’s all about get up, smash them, get in their faces, tag the ball, don’t allow offloads. The behaviours have to change.

“Are we going to see red cards in the Six Nations? Probably. I think there is not a weekend that goes by. For me, that is a good sign that we are not backing away, World Rugby aren’t backing away and saying, ‘Oh god, let’s determine these incidents as accidental and start giving yellow cards’.

“Players know now that if you fly into a ruck with a shoulder tucked and your arm not at least out trying to bind on somebody, you are in a dangerous position. Shooting out of the line, I saw an incident with Richie Arnold. Munster played Toulouse two weeks ago and he shoots out of the line.

“Of course the enthusiasm, the energy as a big forward, you want to try and get at the opposition out-half, but he put himself in a position where he is really risking a red card situation. One or two inches higher and Joey Carbery could be seriously injured but also he [Arnold] is a red card. As it turned out he wasn’t cited because it was deemed at the very top end of the chest.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Some players might argue this, ‘What am I supposed to do?’ Don’t shoot out of the line on your own trying to smash some fella. Then you say, ‘Well, is the game changing? Is that taking the good out of the game?’ No. Referees and the audience watching will understand if there is an accidental collision or if somebody dips a little bit and then they talk about mitigation.

“But I still see some players who are recklessly kind of swinging arms, dipping the shoulder into people. A lot has changed since I played. A lot of this stuff went unnoticed and we have seen from some of the stories about players with early-onset dementia and all that kind of stuff, so we have got to stick to it and keep trying to protect the players.

“I love the physicality of the game. Sometimes it can look really, really physical but when you are out there the adrenaline rush, I love it and the players love it but they have got to be really mindful and find ways and always trying to find ways to improve the game and make it safer.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu suffers new injury setback Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
Search