Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ex-Scotland 10 makes previously unthinkable Duhan van der Merwe call

Scotland's Duhan Van Der Merwe looks dejected during a Guinness Six Nations match between France and Scotland at the Stade de France, on February 26, 2023, in Paris, France. (Photo by Ross MacDonald/SNS Group via Getty Images)

Former Scotland fly-half Ruaridh Jackson has asserted that Glasgow Warriors winger Kyle Steyn is a better player than Duhan van der Merwe and should start ahead of him for Scotland.

ADVERTISEMENT

Steyn led Glasgow Warriors to an unexpected United Rugby Championship title win this season, defeating the Bulls at Loftus Versfeld in the final on Saturday a week after beating then-reigning champions Munster at Thomond Park.

The 30-year-old has been magnificent for the Warriors since returning from injury in January, which led to Jackson making this comparison between the two players on X, saying the only thing van der Merwe can do better is “score the odd freak try”.

Video Spacer

Jake White reflects on what went wrong

Video Spacer

Jake White reflects on what went wrong

There is no denying that 2021 British & Irish Lions wing possesses that oft-overused ‘X-factor’ in Test rugby standing at 1.93m and weighing 106kg, and he has a highlights reel to back that up.

While the fellow South African-born Scot does not have a highlights reel to rival the Edinburgh wing’s, there are few, if any, weaknesses in his game.

“Something I’ve said for a long time but wonder if more people agree now,” the 33-cap Scot wrote on X.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Kyle Steyn is better than Duhan VDM. Only thing VDM can do better is score the odd freak try.

“Scotland back 3 should be Darcy, Steyn, kinghorn and bring VDM on against tired defences.”

Of course, there are two wing berths that can be shared between Steyn and van der Merwe for Scotland, as they did for much of the Six Nations this year. However, Jackson believes the other spot should be taken by Darcy Graham, with van der Merwe being used from the bench to exploit tired defences.

Graham’s pace and agility make him just as potent as van der Merwe out wide, so Scotland would not be lacking in individual brilliance should Gregor Townsend follow Jackson’s advice. He has, however, been beset by injuries recently and will miss Scotland’s July tour as he recovers from surgery to his groin, meaning Jackson will not get to see his preferred back three of Graham, Steyn and Blair Kinghorn at fullback.

Scotland’s upcoming July series, against Canada, the USA, Chile and Uruguay, perhaps affords Townsend the opportunity to experiment more than he usually would during a Test window, meaning it may not even be Steyn and van der Merwe starting on either flank.

The uncapped Arron Reed will surely get plenty of game time over the coming weeks to prove what he can do, as will the four-cap Kyle Rowe and the one-cap Harry Paterson in the back three.

ADVERTISEMENT

Van der Merwe has been a mainstay of the Scotland line-up in recent seasons, but with Fiji, South Africa, Portugal and Australia visiting in November, Townsend will want to field his preferred back three and it will be interesting to see if van der Merwe is part of it.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

10 Comments
F
Frank 174 days ago

Jacko is not often wrong and he's right again. Duhan has an attacking X factor, but Steyn is a much more rounded winger.

K
KiwiSteve 176 days ago

He is also Scottish

M
Mark 177 days ago

This decision is not ‘previously unthinkable’ if you have any decent level of rugby knowledge. I have said since the 2023 six nations that duhan should not play against top tier sides. Despite being a great runner with the ball, every other aspect of his game is next to non-existent. He also shys away and tends to get no successful carries against good teams that can actually defend. Steyn on the other hand is one of the safest all round wingers in the world. Darcy Graham is our attacking winger, steyn should be the safe one.

Doesnt take a genius to work this one out.

Vs south Africa in the world Cup, they wpuld not have scored the cross field kick try is steyn was playing, because he wpuldn’t have wandered 30 meters from his touchline to make 0 impact

C
CL 176 days ago

He has scored some really crappy tries against Tier 1 opposition. That poor effort against England springs to mind. What is wrong with you guys?? In the opposition 22 who would you rather give the ball to, DVDM or Steyn. Do me a favour, the little errors he makes are far outweighed by his try scoring ability. Roger Federer hit some really wayward forehands, he should have been banned immediately from playing tennis!! All the greats have weaknesses but their strengths outweigh them and that is why they are greats!!

r
rs 177 days ago

Interesting that SA known for the “size” or “bulk” of its players make use of pocket battleships like Colby and Arendse on the wing. And then another v d Merwe joins them.

R
Rob 177 days ago

The algorithm has censored my comment about his horrible defence and inability to do anything in attack against poor wingers, guess this is why people are only realising this now

M
Mark 177 days ago

Actual scottish fans who watch and understand every game have had this opinion for a while

R
Rob 177 days ago

People have been saying this for years though 😂

He’s living off a highlight reel from playing against shit wingers that can’t tackle. Then when he plays against teams like South Africa France or Ireland he just shuffles sideways and that’s not even getting into his defence, Ireland in the 2023 six nations scored two tries in his lane one of which scored by Conan was incredibly defendable.

C
CM 177 days ago

Both South Africans. Will Scotland not invest in Scottish youth rugby to produce Scottish players or are they hooked on off the shelf Saffers?

M
Martin 174 days ago

Saffers in rugby are like Brazilians in soccer: you might see them in any national team.

J
JK 175 days ago

SAFers are a quick fix for other countries as there is quite a bit of talent and good training at the youth levels…Scotland, Ireland and England have all partaken at some point

J
John 177 days ago

If it’s in the rules then it’s in the rules. Complain about the rules by all means but about teams who use them to their advantage. Most teams do to one degree or another although Scotland do take it to extremes and it would be better for them if they had a successful youth setup needs must and they are doing what they have to do.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 40 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen."


That's not quite my idea.

For a 20 team champions cup I'd have 4 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 4 from the previous years challenge cup. For a 16 team champions cup I'd have 3 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 1 from the previous years challenge cup.


"The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime."

If teams get a tough draw in the challenge cup quarters, they should have won more pool games and so got better seeding. My system is less about finding the best teams, and more about finding the teams who perform at the highest level in european competition.

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

57 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING James O'Connor on Crusaders preseason: 'I haven't experienced anything like it' O'Connor on Crusaders preseason
Search