Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ex-Springbok quits rugby for family farm

Piet van Zyl. Photo by Bradley Kanaris/Getty Images.

Ex-Springbok halfback Piet van Zyl has announced he will quit rugby at the end of the season to return to his family farm in South Africa.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 29-year-old Stade Francais halfback moved to Paris last year after spells with the Cheetahs, Bulls and London Irish, and played for South Africa three times between 2013-16, making his test debut against Scotland in Nelspruit before going on to play against Samoa and Wales.

Van Zyl said his call to move away from rugby was a family-orientated decision that had been discussed for a year-and-a-half.

“It’s nothing against rugby,” Van Zyl said.

“I love the rugby here. I love the club and I really enjoyed the experience. It’s something that has come a long way with me.

“I ended it with the Bulls about a year-and-a-half ago with the plan to come back to our family farm.

“The decision has been dragged out for a year-and-a-half.

“I am not going anywhere else. To be honest, it’s really sad, I really still want to play, but there comes a time for everything.

“It’s a family decision, I really need to go back now.”

Van Zyl has been a vital member of Stade Francais this season, starting 12 of their 16 matches in the Top 14.

ADVERTISEMENT

Currently lying sixth in the competition, the Parisian club will have to rely on the services of halfbacks Arthur Coville and Clement Daguin following van Zyl’s departure.

Stade Francais will continue their bid for a Top 14 play-offs berth when they face La Rochelle at Stade Marcel-Deflandre this weekend.

Rugby World Cup City Guides – Oita:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search