Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ex-Wallabies skipper joins growing chorus calling for independent review of Rugby Australia following World Cup disaster

Michael Cheika. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Former Australian captain Andrew Slack is among the voices calling for an independent review of both the Wallabies coaching role and the Rugby Australia hierarchy following the World Cup debacle.

ADVERTISEMENT

With Michael Cheika falling on his sword after their disappointing quarter-final exit in Japan on Saturday, there are demands that more figures from Rugby Australia follow him out the door.

Director of rugby Scott Johnson, who came on board in January to rein in Cheika after a series of dismal results, is set to conduct a World Cup review and find the new Wallabies coach.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Rather than rush to appoint Cheika’s replacement, Slack said he’d like to see an independent audit of Australia’s performance at the World Cup and the months preceding it.

Former Test lock turned television commentator and also president of the Players’ Association Justin Harrison is another pushing for an autonomous review.

Slack said that rugby IQ from former players such as Harrison and Dan Herbert should be tapped into and they should have a voice in the review and Johnson should be kept out of it.

“It should be an independent review – I don’t know how you could contemplate it being legitimate if it’s not independent,” Slack said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“With Scott’s role he will need to be investigating certain aspects but in terms of that overall bigger picture he shouldn’t be running that.”

Slack said a review of Cheika couldn’t be completed without a probe into those who appointed him and the RA board should be willing if they felt they had done a good job.

He also said that some criticism of CEO Raelene Castle was unfair given a “number of poor decisions” were made before she started her tenure in early 2018.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B32Wy9vgVU7/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

ADVERTISEMENT

Given Australia’s next test isn’t until midway through next year Slack said Rugby Australia shouldn’t be rushed into appointing a new coach.

“We shouldn’t have a gun put at our head – we’ve got to be not bullied by potential candidates,” said Slack who led the Wallabies on the triumphant 1984 Grand Slam tour and to a Bledisloe Cup series victory on New Zealand soil two years later.

“The right person will be the one who wants the job, not because of the money or the praise but they want the Australian job to do the best by the team and country.”

Slack had no issue with a Kiwi taking the top job but said if the next coach was to be Australian there was a dearth of stand-out candidates.

He said a conversation must be had with England’s Australian coach Eddie Jones, who orchestrated the Wallabies’ World Cup downfall, about him returning to the position he held for five years until 2005.

AAP

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Lions Share | Episode 4

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 18 minutes ago
Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

Nice, that’s good to hear, I was worried for the tackler and it increasing concussions overall.


My question is still the same, and the important one though. Where the rate of concussions in Fed 2 high? Of course if there where only three concussions, and they were reduced now to one, then there is no need for the new laws etc.


There are two angles to this discussion, mine above about player welfare, and of course the that which you raise, legal responsibility. More, the legal responsibility we are concerned with is what’s happening now.


WR don’t really know much about CTE I wouldn’t think, whether it happens from innocuous things like heading a ball, or from small knocks or big knocks that don’t heal. Right now they are ensuring the backside is clean by implementing laws to rule out any possibility they didn’t do enough. So once they understand the problem more they may realise some things are overboard.


The other legal responsibility is the one you are talking about in France, the past. Did the LNR and WR know about the severity and frequency of CTE in rugby? That is the question in that debate. If they didn’t know then theres nothing they could have done, so there is no worry. Further, what we may have now is a situation where 90% of those court actions might not happen in future thanks to the new framework we already have around HIA and head contact processes. Your English example is only going to be an issue if future players still continue to receive CTE (as that is obviously bad), as it is now, the players have taken on their own responsibility by ignore advice. No doubt some countries, like France and New Zealand, will lower their tackle height, but as long as the union has done an adequate job in advising of the severity of the problem at least the legal shadow over the community game will have gone.

227 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leicester Fainga'anuku denied All Blacks eligibility for TRC Fainga'anuku denied All Blacks eligibility for TRC