Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ex-Wallaby captain Horwill weighs in on World Rugby's controversial 'jackal' proposal

James Horwill

Former Wallaby skipper James Horwill has warned proposed law changes aimed at driving the “jackal” out of the sport could fundamentally alter rugby union.

ADVERTISEMENT

While the Harlequins lock understands the need to protect players who are aggressively removed from the breakdown as the try to steal the ball with their hands, he believes the sport must continue to allow a contest for possession or lose one of its fundamental principles.

Increasing injuries to ball stealing “jackals” like Australia’s David Pocock, who has a lingering neck problem caused by heavy hits he takes while in an exposed position at the break down, is forcing World Rugby to look a significant law changes. Law amendments, if any, will only be trialled after this year’s World Cup in Japan and World Rugby insist their moves are designed to commit more players to the ruck to create more space rather than killing off the jackal.

By changing the rules to stop the ball being played by the hand in the breakdown, the contest would return to the days of rucking where players try to drive over the ball after a tackle.

Ironically, old style rucking suffered a similar fate due to the negative publicity created by boots on bodies. However, creating a pushing contest rather than a ball stealing battle by clamping hands on possession and then waiting for the referee’s verdict, is seen as one way of avoiding injury at the breakdown.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Horwill, who will be in the Quins second row for their European Challenge Cup quarter-final at Worcester on Saturday, said: “We need to be careful because the competition part of rugby union makes it unique compared to other sports.

“It is a difficult and I don’t think getting rid of the jackal all together is the right move. We would go too far away from what the game is, but I can understand why they are looking at it in terms of player welfare and injuries. Hopefully, that is the reasoning for doing this and not for other reasons.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If you look at rugby league, then it is not a competition for everything. In union the line out, scrum, ruck and maul all involve competition for the ball and we don’t want to take that out of the sport too much because it makes union great. Yes, there are a lot of injuries coming from that jackal position and teams are going away from that and keeping defenders on their feet and numbers in the defensive line.”

Quins are currently fourth in the Gallagher Premiership and Horwill is confident the club can reach the Challenge Cup final and also make the Premiership play offs. “We have put ourselves in a position where we are in the mix for two bits of silverware ( Premiership title and Europen Challenge Cup) and we need to show more consistency which is something you saw in our performance against Saracens. We did some really good things and played well and stuck to the game plan in the first half and then went away from it in the second. If we can do that we can beat almost anyone.

“It is important to make the most of these opportunities because in sport they are not gifted to you. There are not many times where you can say that with give games in the Premiership to go we are in with a chance of making the play off finals and also be two games away from being in a European final. We have given ourselves these opportunities and it’s now about making the most of them and win silverware.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 25 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search