Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ex-Wallaby captain Horwill weighs in on World Rugby's controversial 'jackal' proposal

James Horwill

Former Wallaby skipper James Horwill has warned proposed law changes aimed at driving the “jackal” out of the sport could fundamentally alter rugby union.

ADVERTISEMENT

While the Harlequins lock understands the need to protect players who are aggressively removed from the breakdown as the try to steal the ball with their hands, he believes the sport must continue to allow a contest for possession or lose one of its fundamental principles.

Increasing injuries to ball stealing “jackals” like Australia’s David Pocock, who has a lingering neck problem caused by heavy hits he takes while in an exposed position at the break down, is forcing World Rugby to look a significant law changes. Law amendments, if any, will only be trialled after this year’s World Cup in Japan and World Rugby insist their moves are designed to commit more players to the ruck to create more space rather than killing off the jackal.

By changing the rules to stop the ball being played by the hand in the breakdown, the contest would return to the days of rucking where players try to drive over the ball after a tackle.

Ironically, old style rucking suffered a similar fate due to the negative publicity created by boots on bodies. However, creating a pushing contest rather than a ball stealing battle by clamping hands on possession and then waiting for the referee’s verdict, is seen as one way of avoiding injury at the breakdown.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Horwill, who will be in the Quins second row for their European Challenge Cup quarter-final at Worcester on Saturday, said: “We need to be careful because the competition part of rugby union makes it unique compared to other sports.

“It is a difficult and I don’t think getting rid of the jackal all together is the right move. We would go too far away from what the game is, but I can understand why they are looking at it in terms of player welfare and injuries. Hopefully, that is the reasoning for doing this and not for other reasons.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If you look at rugby league, then it is not a competition for everything. In union the line out, scrum, ruck and maul all involve competition for the ball and we don’t want to take that out of the sport too much because it makes union great. Yes, there are a lot of injuries coming from that jackal position and teams are going away from that and keeping defenders on their feet and numbers in the defensive line.”

Quins are currently fourth in the Gallagher Premiership and Horwill is confident the club can reach the Challenge Cup final and also make the Premiership play offs. “We have put ourselves in a position where we are in the mix for two bits of silverware ( Premiership title and Europen Challenge Cup) and we need to show more consistency which is something you saw in our performance against Saracens. We did some really good things and played well and stuck to the game plan in the first half and then went away from it in the second. If we can do that we can beat almost anyone.

“It is important to make the most of these opportunities because in sport they are not gifted to you. There are not many times where you can say that with give games in the Premiership to go we are in with a chance of making the play off finals and also be two games away from being in a European final. We have given ourselves these opportunities and it’s now about making the most of them and win silverware.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The appointment I would make to save Steve Borthwick – Andy Goode The appointment I would make to save Steve Borthwick – Andy Goode
Search