Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ex-Wallaby proposes scrapping Australian Super Rugby team

Dejected Wales faces a pool stage exit - PA

Eternally wounded from his own World Cup horror show, former Wallaby Stephen Hoiles believes less Australian Super Rugby teams is one answer to the country’s spectacular fall from grace.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallabies are on the brink of a humiliating group-stage elimination after backing up their first loss to Fiji in 69 years with a record 40-6 drubbing at the hands of Wales.

Fans are calling for Eddie Jones’s head after the coach’s decision to pick the World Cup’s youngest squad backfired in the most extraordinary fashion.

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones post-match media briefing after heavy loss to Wales

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones post-match media briefing after heavy loss to Wales

Hoiles, who played just one Test after being a member of Australia’s previously worst World Cup campaign in 2007, reckons cutting one of Australia’s five Super Rugby teams would be a major help in restoring depth and credibility to the national team.

Between the Brumbies, NSW Waratahs, Queensland Reds, Melbourne Rebels and Western Force, Australian sides have won only a handful of games against New Zealand opposition in the past decade.

Related

Battered psychologically even before taking to the field, generations of Wallabies players have failed for 20 years to win back the Bledisloe Cup from the All Blacks, let alone challenge for global supremacy.

“I feel for the players because some of these guys they’re not ready for Test rugby yet and that’s not to be mean or personal about it,” Hoiles told Stan Sport.

ADVERTISEMENT

“And too many of them haven’t played well enough at Super Rugby. We’ve got five Super Rugby sides that have been (mediocre).

“The Brumbies have been the most successful over the last sort of five to eight years. The Tahs have had glimpses of success eight, nine years ago, the Reds 11, 12 years ago. Besides that, we’re in a failing Super Rugby system.

“So as much as we can look at the coaches and go, ‘yeah, let’s change that’, it’s the players that are out there that haven’t got the time in the saddle to be consistent.

“I look at this side – and I don’t like to use this word lightly – as a bunch of kids playing against men and we took our men out of this campaign and said, let’s put more kids in and let’s let them learn from this and they’ll get better from it.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Sadly, they might not get better. I lost a quarter-final. That’s all I’m carrying. I’m scarred from losing a quarter-final. I was 26. I thought I’d get another crack. I didn’t. Some of these guys may not recover from this.”

Related

Hoiles, now a successful coach who guided Randwick to a drought-breaking first Sydney club rugby premiership this year since 2004, says Rugby Australia has only itself to blame.

“I say it on TV, getting paid from TV – broadcast wants more games and more products and more teams – but more teams makes us unsuccessful and it hasn’t helped for a long time.

“I played at the Brumbies, I played at the Waratahs. If it meant getting rid of one of them to make Australian rugby better, I’d be all for it because we don’t have the depth and talent to play this many players at a professional level,” he said.

“All the Super teams are doing at the moment are signing foreign players, so every side’s got five to six foreigners. Club footy’s thriving, school footy’s thriving.

“When I was over there last week, world rugby’s pumping. It is a very healthy game at a global level. We’re just not successful at state and national level at the moment.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

12 Comments
N
Nickers 451 days ago

Cutting 2 Aussie teams seems like a necessary short term step. RA has pumped a disproportionate amount of resources into elite men's rugby at the expense of creating the next generation of players. NZ is in a similar boat at the moment.

D
DarstedlyDan 451 days ago

The goal should be to have Oz super rugby teams that are competitive - that could win SR. One way to improve the team quality is to cut the number - but this is short sighted as it limits possibilities for Aussie players and in any case cutting a team is hard - wherever it is cut will be lost to Australian rugby for a generation. So the existing teams need to be improved. How? Why not via foreign players? Target a small number of test or near test quality SA/NH players in key positions, pay them very well, and use them to boost the weakest 2-3 Oz teams. This has to be targeted and coordinated by the ARU - you don’t want 4 of 5 teams for example with a foreign player in the same position. The standard increases, competition for places increases, SR improves. Win for everyone. Since it is a benefit for SR and SH rugby as a whole, use some of the NZ broadcasting money that Hamish keeps whining about instead of just giving it to him? The old solutions won’t cut it - and SH rugby needs a strong Australia. So let’s try something different.

A
Anand 452 days ago

When you have more teams you have a larger pool to choose from.
Players train in teams and their performance is judged then they are selected into the national team.
There are 5 teams in super rugby right now meaning 75 players in the main roster to select from, If you have 3 teams you have to select from 45 players for the Aus team????
If you are really that smart, why don't you just use 1 team in Super Rugby and the same
as the Australian Team!
Where would you select from ???

Aussie rugby union has a grass roots problem, kids not playing this game they prefer League

H
Hit-Cho-Wa 453 days ago

Choaches will always be the Good, Bad and ugly to the public. I have seen lazy players in world rugby that are there for the money. So step up players and be accountable to your country and not take a step back.

R
Ric 453 days ago

Australia , NZ needs you as much as you need us. We all would have to be blind if we did not see this coming, look at our Super Comp, its boring nothing has changed in a decade. When the ABs lost to Ireland and Argentina boy did we feel the pain just like your
side is doing now. A solution may be to follow league and allow players to make themselves available to play for any Super franchise, same with coaches. Just a final word we are ANZACs

R
Ruby 453 days ago

I don't support it, if you're a young athlete in Australia trying to make a career out of it are you going to pursue Union with 4 teams or League with 16? Reducing the number of professional Rugby players in Australia isn't going to improve the Wallabies, what they need is a competition below Super Rugby.

h
h 453 days ago

legend hoiles. putting himself on the line. cut 2 teams.

A
Andrew 453 days ago

I love it Eddie is a bust you need some experience in any RWC team. Having Hooper and Copper out of line up with such a young team was dumb. Eddie lied about interviewing with Japan and anyway why would Japan want him after seeing what hes done with Wallabies. Im kiwi i say stick with Rugby League at least you can cheat and use the refs to win for you.
All Blacks have had some loses lately but we can come back. World rugby overseas is getting better Nz is always a traget because weve always been consistantly good.
Cheers

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 37 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search