Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ex-Wallaby proposes scrapping Australian Super Rugby team

Dejected Wales faces a pool stage exit - PA

Eternally wounded from his own World Cup horror show, former Wallaby Stephen Hoiles believes less Australian Super Rugby teams is one answer to the country’s spectacular fall from grace.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallabies are on the brink of a humiliating group-stage elimination after backing up their first loss to Fiji in 69 years with a record 40-6 drubbing at the hands of Wales.

Fans are calling for Eddie Jones’s head after the coach’s decision to pick the World Cup’s youngest squad backfired in the most extraordinary fashion.

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones post-match media briefing after heavy loss to Wales

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones post-match media briefing after heavy loss to Wales

Hoiles, who played just one Test after being a member of Australia’s previously worst World Cup campaign in 2007, reckons cutting one of Australia’s five Super Rugby teams would be a major help in restoring depth and credibility to the national team.

Between the Brumbies, NSW Waratahs, Queensland Reds, Melbourne Rebels and Western Force, Australian sides have won only a handful of games against New Zealand opposition in the past decade.

Related

Battered psychologically even before taking to the field, generations of Wallabies players have failed for 20 years to win back the Bledisloe Cup from the All Blacks, let alone challenge for global supremacy.

“I feel for the players because some of these guys they’re not ready for Test rugby yet and that’s not to be mean or personal about it,” Hoiles told Stan Sport.

ADVERTISEMENT

“And too many of them haven’t played well enough at Super Rugby. We’ve got five Super Rugby sides that have been (mediocre).

“The Brumbies have been the most successful over the last sort of five to eight years. The Tahs have had glimpses of success eight, nine years ago, the Reds 11, 12 years ago. Besides that, we’re in a failing Super Rugby system.

“So as much as we can look at the coaches and go, ‘yeah, let’s change that’, it’s the players that are out there that haven’t got the time in the saddle to be consistent.

“I look at this side – and I don’t like to use this word lightly – as a bunch of kids playing against men and we took our men out of this campaign and said, let’s put more kids in and let’s let them learn from this and they’ll get better from it.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Sadly, they might not get better. I lost a quarter-final. That’s all I’m carrying. I’m scarred from losing a quarter-final. I was 26. I thought I’d get another crack. I didn’t. Some of these guys may not recover from this.”

Related

Hoiles, now a successful coach who guided Randwick to a drought-breaking first Sydney club rugby premiership this year since 2004, says Rugby Australia has only itself to blame.

“I say it on TV, getting paid from TV – broadcast wants more games and more products and more teams – but more teams makes us unsuccessful and it hasn’t helped for a long time.

“I played at the Brumbies, I played at the Waratahs. If it meant getting rid of one of them to make Australian rugby better, I’d be all for it because we don’t have the depth and talent to play this many players at a professional level,” he said.

“All the Super teams are doing at the moment are signing foreign players, so every side’s got five to six foreigners. Club footy’s thriving, school footy’s thriving.

“When I was over there last week, world rugby’s pumping. It is a very healthy game at a global level. We’re just not successful at state and national level at the moment.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

12 Comments
N
Nickers 421 days ago

Cutting 2 Aussie teams seems like a necessary short term step. RA has pumped a disproportionate amount of resources into elite men's rugby at the expense of creating the next generation of players. NZ is in a similar boat at the moment.

D
DarstedlyDan 421 days ago

The goal should be to have Oz super rugby teams that are competitive - that could win SR. One way to improve the team quality is to cut the number - but this is short sighted as it limits possibilities for Aussie players and in any case cutting a team is hard - wherever it is cut will be lost to Australian rugby for a generation. So the existing teams need to be improved. How? Why not via foreign players? Target a small number of test or near test quality SA/NH players in key positions, pay them very well, and use them to boost the weakest 2-3 Oz teams. This has to be targeted and coordinated by the ARU - you don’t want 4 of 5 teams for example with a foreign player in the same position. The standard increases, competition for places increases, SR improves. Win for everyone. Since it is a benefit for SR and SH rugby as a whole, use some of the NZ broadcasting money that Hamish keeps whining about instead of just giving it to him? The old solutions won’t cut it - and SH rugby needs a strong Australia. So let’s try something different.

A
Anand 422 days ago

When you have more teams you have a larger pool to choose from.
Players train in teams and their performance is judged then they are selected into the national team.
There are 5 teams in super rugby right now meaning 75 players in the main roster to select from, If you have 3 teams you have to select from 45 players for the Aus team????
If you are really that smart, why don't you just use 1 team in Super Rugby and the same
as the Australian Team!
Where would you select from ???

Aussie rugby union has a grass roots problem, kids not playing this game they prefer League

H
Hit-Cho-Wa 422 days ago

Choaches will always be the Good, Bad and ugly to the public. I have seen lazy players in world rugby that are there for the money. So step up players and be accountable to your country and not take a step back.

R
Ric 422 days ago

Australia , NZ needs you as much as you need us. We all would have to be blind if we did not see this coming, look at our Super Comp, its boring nothing has changed in a decade. When the ABs lost to Ireland and Argentina boy did we feel the pain just like your
side is doing now. A solution may be to follow league and allow players to make themselves available to play for any Super franchise, same with coaches. Just a final word we are ANZACs

R
Ruby 422 days ago

I don't support it, if you're a young athlete in Australia trying to make a career out of it are you going to pursue Union with 4 teams or League with 16? Reducing the number of professional Rugby players in Australia isn't going to improve the Wallabies, what they need is a competition below Super Rugby.

h
h 422 days ago

legend hoiles. putting himself on the line. cut 2 teams.

A
Andrew 422 days ago

I love it Eddie is a bust you need some experience in any RWC team. Having Hooper and Copper out of line up with such a young team was dumb. Eddie lied about interviewing with Japan and anyway why would Japan want him after seeing what hes done with Wallabies. Im kiwi i say stick with Rugby League at least you can cheat and use the refs to win for you.
All Blacks have had some loses lately but we can come back. World rugby overseas is getting better Nz is always a traget because weve always been consistantly good.
Cheers

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame' 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame'
Search