Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Excessive': Pundits angry as Umaga red-carded again for Wasps

(Photo by Glyn Kirk/AFP via Getty Images)

Boos rang around the Coventry Building Society Arena on Saturday after Jacob Umaga was controversially red-carded six minutes before the interval in Wasps’ Heineken Champions Cup match versus defending champions Toulouse. The one-cap England prospect had only just completed a suspension for the Gallagher Premiership red card he received on Boxing Day for a dangerous tackle on Ollie Hassell-Collins of London Irish.  

ADVERTISEMENT

Umaga was given a three-match ban following that sending-off and was set to sit out the European game versus Toulouse. However, the successful completion of a World Rugby tackle school intervention shaved the last week off that suspension, freeing the 23-year-old to be chosen at full-back by Wasps boss Lee Blackett. 

He was unfortunately left wishing that he hadn’t had his ban cut from three games to two as his return for his club was abruptly ended on 34 minutes by a red card from Irish referee Chris Busby, who was taking charge of his first-ever Champions Cup match. 

Video Spacer

Francois Hougaard on Wasps beating Leicester and his memories of Bakkies Botha

Video Spacer

Francois Hougaard on Wasps beating Leicester and his memories of Bakkies Botha

The incident unfolded at a time when Wasps were 14-7 up but trying to negate an attack where Toulouse were offloading and attacking the space. Scrum-half Martin Page-Relo, chosen to start in place of Antoine Dupont, raced towards the home side’s 22 where he was tackled around the legs by Charlie Atkinson. Umaga then intervened higher up and there was head-to-head contact with the visiting French player.   

BT Sport pundits Lawrence Dallaglio and Austin Healey were adamant that it was a yellow card offence at worst for Umaga but referee Bushy reached a different conclusion about the Wasps player with his TMO Brian McNeice.

“There is foul play here,” said Busby. “For me, the tackler’s tackle height is too high, he is upright and we clearly have direct head-to-head contact. What I want to look at is whether we have any potential mitigation. There is a second tackler but I am not sure that changes the dynamic of the situation or caused a change of direction.”

After another review of the footage, Busby concluded: “So, as we have discussed it, is a clear act of foul play. The tackle height is too high, he is upright, it’s clear head-to-head contact. I see this as a high degree of danger. I don’t see any reason to mitigate so for me it is a red card.” 

ADVERTISEMENT

Busby then ran back to the other half of the pitch and flashed the red card at Umaga, explaining: “It’s an upright tackle, it’s a clear head-to-head contact. There is no mitigation. For me, it’s a red card.”

A chorus of boos immediately rang out at the ground as Wasps supporters reacted incredulously to the sending off. It also exercised the pundits in the TV commentary booth. “That is excessive,” bemoaned Healey. “I don’t think it is a red card.

“At worst, he has received a red card here for poor tackle technique, not for the head-on-head. Well obviously for the head-on-head but that is a byproduct of hitting with the wrong shoulder. He hasn’t intentionally gone high on the head for me. It’s an accidental collision.”  

Dallaglio added: “The (Toulouse) player going into contact has jumped into Umaga. It is the wrong technique. He [Umaga] has got his head in the wrong position but in trying to free himself from Atkinson’s tackle, he [Page-Relo] has jumped into Umaga so there is mitigation and that is a yellow at best. The referee has got that wrong.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Wasps went on to beat Toulouse 30-22 with a three-try performance despite being a man down for 46 minutes, but they will surely fight the corner for Umaga as it wasn’t the first time they received a controversial Champions Cup red card this season. Skipper Brad Shields was sent off versus Munster for a tackle on Dave Kilcoyne and after he was subsequently banned, he appealed and had the suspension successfully overturned. 

The debate surrounding the Umaga red was further inflamed in the second half when Toulouse’s Anthony Jelonch was only given a yellow card for his crunching high tackle on Wasps’ Alfie Barbeary. “For me, the tackle height is too high by No8 red,” reckoned referee Busby.

“We do have head contact but I do see this situation is different than the one in the first half and we do have a significant drop by the ball carrier just prior to contact. He [Jelonch] is attempting to make a legal tackle so I am seeing mitigation there… all that being said it is still dangerous. Yellow card.”

TV pundit Healey commented: “I think the first tackle is very, very similar because it is a really big drop in height in the very last seconds because there are two (Wasps) people in both tackles.”

Dallaglio added: “I don’t disagree with this [Jelonch] decision and I do understand what he [the referee] has done but I don’t agree with the Umaga sending off because there was mitigation in that as well.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
T
Timsenlac 1070 days ago

Actually Austin Healey is not a 2003 Rugby World Cup winner as he wasn't selected for the squad. I never understood why. He may be as iritating as candidiasis but he was a damn fine rugby player.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search