Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Exeter tackle damning accusation about them and new drop-out rule

(Photo by PA)

Rob Baxter has laid bare his exasperation that the new goal-line drop-out rule is a major reason why Exeter haven’t been as dominant as they were in recent campaigns. The Chiefs currently find themselves sixth on the Gallagher Premiership table, 18 points behind leaders Leicester following five defeats in a dozen matches. 

ADVERTISEMENT

They have also had their Champions Cup hopes dented by a defeat last month at Glasgow but director of rugby Baxter has insisted there is no truth whatsoever in the allegation that Exeter are suffering due to one particular law change introduced for the 2021/22 season. 

Whereas previously an attacking team that got held up over the try line without grounding the ball was given the put-in at a five-metre scrum to restart play, possession is now handed over to the defending team who are allowed to kick a drop-out from their goal line

Video Spacer

Francois Hougaard on Wasps beating Leicester and his memories of Bakkies Botha

Video Spacer

Francois Hougaard on Wasps beating Leicester and his memories of Bakkies Botha

The insinuation around the Premiership is that the attacking threat of Exeter has been blunted because of this rule change but Baxter was adamant that wasn’t the case. 

Instead of buying into the accusation, he outlined that the Chiefs’ problem wasn’t that they were getting held up over the line and surrendering possession. The issue was that they aren’t getting close enough to the line in the first place to be in a position to score tries.

Baxter has a point. Previously, the Exeter try tally regularly used to be one of the most envious in the league but they have only scored 35 tries in their dozen league outings so far, a strike rate eclipsed by six rival clubs while another opponent has that same number of five-pointers. “I said this at a members forum the other day and it raised a laugh because a lot of people keep talking about it as us being held up over the try line and it has caused a bit of an issue for us. 

“I actually said, ‘Well, it hasn’t caused a problem because we haven’t been getting over the line, you see what I mean?’ The goal-line drop is only an issue if you get held up over the try line – we haven’t been getting that far,” surmised Baxter, speaking ahead of Saturday’s Sandy Park rematch with Glasgow in Europe.   

ADVERTISEMENT

“I said this at the start of the season: If teams have to kick goal-line drop-outs because we keep getting over the try line and getting held up we will probably be winning the game by about 50 points. You don’t get over the try line loads of times and not get it grounded. Our biggest problem is we haven’t been getting over the try line. 

“Yes, there are elements of things we have tweaked but if anything I would say our biggest issue is trying to stay ahead of the game or to keep progressing and keep trying to score tries in different ways.

“Actually, some teams are very single-minded in how they score now. Gloucester is a perfect example. Gloucester and Leicester have very much got the best mauls in the Premiership now. They are single-minded and know what they are doing. No one is questioning them has the goal-line drop-out changed it because they have gone to a more focused driving game. This is what I am saying to you. 

“The goal-line drop-out itself, has it prevented Gloucester from having a successful maul? It hasn’t because they are doing it well. It wouldn’t prevent us from having a successful maul or a successful pick-and-go game if we were doing it well – we just have to do it better than we are doing it. The rule itself is not affecting us because we are having very few taken against us. We have actually hardly received any goal-line drop-outs.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search