Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Watch - Exiled Wales star Joe Hawkins cops ban for hit that hurt him more than ball carrier

Joe Hawkins and Henry Slade of Exeter Chiefs look on during the Investec Champions Cup match between Exeter Chiefs and Glasgow Warriors at Sandy Park on January 13, 2024 in Exeter, England. (Photo by Harry Trump/Getty Images)

Exiled Wales star Joe Hawkins has received a ban for an incident over the weekend in his side’s 40-17 loss in the Champions Cup to Bayonne.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Exeter Chiefs centre has been handed a three-week suspension after an independent Disciplinary Hearing found his guilty regarding the Round 4 match against Bayonne at Stade Jean-Dauger.

Hawkins was shown a red card in the 77th minute by referee Nika Amashukeli of Georgia for dangerously tackling Aviron Bayonnais replacement Federico Mori contravening Law 9.13 which states a player must not tackle an opponent early late or dangerously.

The ban comes even though Hawkins came off much the worse of the two players involved.

Under World Rugby’s Sanctions for Foul Play Law 9.13 has sanction entry points of 2 weeks at the low end 6 weeks mid-range and 10 to 52 weeks at the top end. The case was reviewed on a papers-only basis by independent Judicial Officer Pamela Woodman from Scotland who concluded that Hawkins’ tackle warranted a red card. She deemed the offense to be mid-range leading to a starting sanction of six weeks.

The sanction was halved to three weeks considering Hawkins’ prompt acceptance of the charge and his cooperation with the disciplinary process. As per the Exeter Chiefs’ fixture list Hawkins can return to play on Monday 19 February. However with a completed World Rugby Coaching Intervention he may resume playing as early as Monday 12 February.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
J
Jaks 300 days ago

Ban is for the recklessness of the hit. I think the laws are clear and have been for a while now. If you're not attempting to tackle low and get a shot to the head regardless of impact its a yellow or red. People need to get over it. The new laws are there to protect both the runner and the tacklers. If you get a ban for poor tackle technique that's on you.

C
Clive 301 days ago

The game has gone woke, I’ve been hit harder by my 12 yr old granddaughter. No malice and very little force, a weak Rse penalty at most.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame' 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame'
Search