Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Why The Hurricanes Never Should Have Got Their Hands On The 2016 Super Rugby Trophy

TJ Perenara and Beauden Barrett

Ladies and gentlemen, the Hurricanes are your 2016 Super Rugby Champions. Jamie Wall explains why that should come as a surprise.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was fitting that the Hurricanes finally repaid their fans for years of anguish on the most Wellington night imaginable, in the wind and the rain and the freezing cold at Westpac Stadium. But the fact the conditions matched the name of the team is about the only thing that does fit about the Canes of 2016.

A team whose tagline for so many years was ‘expect the unexpected’ managed to do just that, pulling off their most unexpected season yet. Here’s why the Hurricanes shouldn’t have got anywhere near the Super Rugby title in 2016.

Who was in the midfield? Conrad Smith and Ma’a Nonu played a combined 252 games for the franchise and really should have won a title in that time, given that, you know, they were two of the greatest All Blacks ever. Their joint departure last season opened up a revolving door of Matt Proctor, Willis Halaholo, Pita Ahki, Vince Aso and Ngani Laumape (a league convert who hadn’t played rugby since college). This perceived weakness ended up being the cornerstone of their outstanding defensive effort in the playoffs.

The most potent attacking threats barely fired a shot. You’d have thought to have any kind of tilt at the title the Hurricanes would have needed a massive season from Savea, but by the end he was coming off the bench for Jason Woodward once each finals game was securely in the bag. Meanwhile Nehe Milner-Skudder’s season lasted all of one-and-a-half games.

 
banner5

 

They got absolutely destroyed in their first game. Cast your mind back to February 26th, when the new-look Hurricanes opened their season in Canberra with a record loss to the Brumbies. Their woeful performance drew the ire of noted motormouth Phil Kearns, who labelled them fat and unfit. It was hard to argue with him.

ADVERTISEMENT

The New Zealand Conference. We’ve talked about the conference system and how it’s not supposed to be fair, so it was quite an achievement for the Canes to simply make the playoffs at all. Their dominant last round win over the Crusaders saw them skyrocket up the table and laid the foundations for their playoffs run.

The final really should have been in Johannesburg. Oh, Johan Ackermann. In what surely ranks retrospectively as the worst decision in the history of Super Rugby, the Lions coach dudded his team and fans by sending an understrength side to get beaten by Los Jaguares in Buenos Aires. The loss cost them top spot on the ladder and meant that instead of playing in front of 60,000 home fans on Ellis Park, they had to travel 12,000km to the windswept chamber of horror that is Westpac Stadium.

They had a bad kit. All the jerseys went a bit busy this year, but the Canes designers seemed to take their inspiration from a pair of painters’ overalls. However, they’re now immortalised as the most successful garb in team history, so they’ll be on for a comeback if Super Rugby ever does a retro round.

However, as soon as a shivering Dane Coles got his hands on the Super Rugby trophy, all of the above became a moot point. There’ll be no more jibes from the rest of New Zealand rugby fans about the sparseness of the Hurricanes’ trophy cabinet – you can’t argue with the first team to not concede a try in the entire playoffs.

ADVERTISEMENT

They carried that determination through to the final, which could’ve easily ended up with a scoreline in single digits had it not been for two grubby tries off Lions mistakes. Given the fact that the Canes entire history has been typified by exciting, attacking rugby, this might be the greatest irony of all.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search