Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Experimental selection must stop for Joe Schmidt’s Bledisloe showdown

Australia sing their national anthem before the Rugby Championship match between Argentina and Australia at Brigadier General Estanislao Lopez Stadium in Santa Fe, Argentina on September 07, 2024. (Photo by GERONIMO URANGA/AFP via Getty Images)

If you had told Wallabies supporters at the start of the year that they would be heading into the Bledisloe series on the same number of wins as the All Blacks, most of them probably would’ve jumped at it.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallabies have won four of their seven matches, sitting at a 57 win-percentage heading into Bledisloe one, but make no mistake the Wallabies and the All Blacks are not playing at the same level.

The equal win ratio does not reflect where the two sides are at, and Joe Schmidt must pick his most experienced and skilful side to avoid a bloodbath from a All Blacks side hurting after a two-nil series defeat against South Africa.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Schmidt has been pragmatic about the season to date, saying he needs time to develop his inexperienced side.
This notion has logic, is showing results, and will continue to do so the longer Schmidt has with this group, but some marquee events like the Bledisloe requires a different approach.

The coveted Bledisloe trophy for Australians and New Zealanders has a mythical status, one which rivals even that of a World Cup, or at least it did until New Zealand went on a 21-year-long streak.

You only have to look at The Rugby Championship points-for (PF), points-against (PA) ledger to see how big the gap is, the Wallabies are the only side with a negative points differential sitting at -83 (+/-).

Rugby Championship

P
W
L
D
PF
PA
PD
BP T
BP-7
BP
Total
1
South Africa
4
4
0
0
18
2
Argentina
4
2
2
0
10
3
New Zealand
4
1
3
0
7
4
Australia
4
1
3
0
4
ADVERTISEMENT

The Bledisloe drought must be broken and if Schmidt and his men are to have any chance of doing so, Schmidt must select the tried and tested.

He must select his most experienced and best squad; the experimentation must cease for this two-game window.

Schmidt has the entire Spring Tour to carry a bloated squad, the tour will include Australia A matches which will be perfect for trialling players and ideas, but the Bledisloe must be taken with deadly seriousness.

Who comes in

Previously injured captain Liam Wright is the first player Schmidt should put on his recall list.

ADVERTISEMENT

His work-rate as a no.6 was second to none during Super Rugby Pacific.

His ability to clean rucks effectively and accurately as well pilfer means he’s one of the most disruptive breakdown threats in Australia.

His attack has also gone to a new level in 2024, his ability to split defenders has been aided by the kilos he seems to have added to his frame.

As Schmidt’s first choice captain, he also adds another leader to the inexperienced cohort as well a lineout caller, who is a pest at the defensive lineout.

The second man on Schmidt’s list must be Fraser McReight.

The Queensland Reds no.7 is one of the Wallabies best loose-play running threats and it is an element the side has missed while he’s been injured.

His experience is also invaluable and so are the connections he has with players like Harry Wilson, Tate McDermott, and Matt Faessler who have been mainstays of Schmidt’s teams.

However, he does not automatically walk back into the starting side like his Reds captain Wright, because Carlo Tizzano has been beyond impressive with his near immaculate tackle record and consistent breakdown turnovers.

Tizzano’s rapid rise to a Test level brawler means McReight will have to prove himself in training and it could very well see McReight enter the Bledisloe fray from the bench.

The two have played impressively enough to warrant having one of them on the bench, perhaps for a 6-2 split.

A player who has been on a lengthier injury lay-off but who can bring size, experience, and versatility to the Wallabies is Rob Leota.

He suffered a grade two hamstring strain and should’ve returned to training throughout August.

Whether he is ready to play in Bledisloe one remains to be seen but his experience, leadership qualities, and ability cover almost the entire backrow as well as the second row is an asset.

His 190cm and 110kg of beef would help the Wallabies in their bid to increase their gainline metres.

The weekend’s demolition at the hands of Los Pumas showed the Wallabies locking stocks are very light on, so although there are more experienced locks in Australia,

none of them have taken Schmidt’s fancy or have had recent form.

The reality is there are no quick fixes in that department.

Likewise, there are some questions which must be answered in the front row.

James Slipper and Allan Alaalatoa have been far from impressive and have not been holding up at scrum time.

Nevertheless, their experience alone warrants their continued selection in the squad so they can bring through the next generation.

Alaalatoa is also coming back from a ruptured Achilles, so he is still getting back to the height of his powers.

Isaac Aedo Kailea has truly impressed and has allowed Schmidt to bide his time with Angus Bell, who has been majorly impressive since his return from another foot injury.

At tighthead prop, Tom Robertson should be strongly considered to be the second pick tighthead while Alaalatoa finds his form.

Kailea holds his own so it’s really only at tighthead-prop where the Wallabies need some bolstering, but the stocks are razor thin, Zane Nonggorr has not shown yet he is a force at scrum time.

Who goes out

Tom Hooper, Langi Gleeson, and Angus Blyth have all struggled to bring impact in their Tests so far.

Hooper is a big lad, and Blyth is even bigger, but they have failed to impose themselves physically on oppositions.

Gleeson is a power athlete, but it doesn’t seem as though Schmidt has found the best way to use him yet.

Gleeson has a raw strength and acceleration few other forwards his age possess but he’s been unable to bring those strengths to the fore for the Wallabies this year.

Blyth needed to show he could be an enforcer, Hooper had to illustrate his versatility and carry game while Gleeson needed to bend the line, none of them showed even glimpses of these qualities.

This is not to say they should be ruled out for the rest of the year, but they have not impressed enough to retain a spot in the squad for this two Test window for the Bledisloe.

During the Spring Tour Schmidt will have plenty of time to embed his concepts in a more controlled and intense environment, and it is there where he could begin to unlock these players as well as others’ full potential.

The Wallabies have their backs against the wall for the Bledisloe, they have history, recent form and inexperience all against them leading into this clash.

Nevertheless, there is an instability within the All Blacks which just makes them feel off, if Schmidt and his men even want a sniff at clinching one of the upcoming two

Tests then Schmidt is going to have to go conservative and play his most experienced and best 23.

John Ferguson’s team to play Bledisloe 1

1. Isaac Aedo Kailea
2. Matt Faessler
3. Taniela Tupou
4. Nick Frost
5. Lukhan Salakaia-Loto
6. Liam Wright
7. Carlo Tizzano
8. Rob Valetini
9. Jake Gordon
10. Noah Lolesio
11. Marika Koroibete
12. Hamish Stewart
13. Len Ikitau
14. Andrew Kellaway
15. Tom Wright

Replacements

16. Brandon Paenga-Amosa
17. Angus Bell
18. Tom Robertson
19. Jeremy Williams
20. Fraser McReight
21. Harry Wilson
22. Tate McDermott
23. Ben Donaldson

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

15 Comments
m
mJ 100 days ago

Backline defence was a big problem, connection between Ikitau and Stewart was dreadful and Stewart far too passive. Ikitau doesn’t have confidence in Stewart and that’s a big problem. Paisami was an attacking defensive player and read the game well and picked off plays early, put in dominant tackles and with Paisami both could be strong in defence, with Stewart Ikitau is finding himself marking multiple players because Stewart is a more negative defensive player. Stewart needs to go and Ikitau needs to start running the defence with dominance. Ikitau was poor on the weekend but the work inside him not just from Stewart was atrocious.

J
John 99 days ago

Noting Paisami's aggression in defence is vert apt, his connect with Ikitau is much better than most are aware. Those two in the centres and that score would never had happened.

m
mJ 100 days ago

Tizzano is pretty one dimensional compared to McReight. McReight is a far more complete player and adds way more than tackling. His support play alone, forwards to back link, half back at lineouts, leadership etc. He walks straight back in.

J
John 99 days ago

I think his breakdwon work is just as good as McReight and is easily better than McReight's after four Tests. I agree McReight has a better running game but we need him in there to make the breakdwon hell for the opposition and to make strong tackles.


Tizzano has made a good amount of dominant tackles against some of the world's best forwards.

A
AM 100 days ago

Not sure of your judgment here mate.


Two main problems for Aus are scrum and backline D.


AA and Slipper have to go. Bring in Scott Sio and Latu if they are free. Former played well for Exeter and Latu is playing well in France. They need then to find an additional tighthead. Nongoor is worse at scrum time than AA. Robertson is not a good scrummager either so may as well go for Pone as he at least is the best running prop in Aus with Bell. Until Blake is back.


Donaldson is a better 10 than Noah but both of them need a proper 12 and 15 to support their games. Paisami is not at international level so better off going for 40 mins of Kerevi and Reece Hodge as Hodge can help with kicking game and can drop back to 15.


Wright is too inconsistent and lacks judgment. Better off with Hodge and Kellaway or the 15 from the Reds. Need some proper speed on the wing so go with the 7s guy.


McReight isn’t international level. He gets blown off the ball and his D is not as good as Tizzano. So better off with the former and load up size at 8 and blindside. Agree with Leota choice.


Then you obviously have Skelton, the Arnold Bros and guys like Samu who are playing well OS and Samu better in attack than McReight and Tizzano but not as good as Tizzano in D.


With those guys in the team is much more competitive.

J
John 99 days ago

While this list of players is great none of them are realsitic. It won't help at the moment.


Hodge, Latu, Sio not on the radar I don't think. Also, LHP is not where the immediate issue is, it's at THP, if AAA is not performing who do we pull in?

O
OJohn 100 days ago

Donaldson is completely hopeless. He wouldn't be in the top 5 Australian 10's.

He's only there because he from Randwick.

Tizzano is nowhere near McReight.

L
Lulu 101 days ago

Never liked the wallabies but to see where they are now is very sad. Always had such skillful and intelligent players.

HAve to get the Koko boys to lace up.

M
Margaret Freemantle 101 days ago

It amuses me that the Brumbies have been by far the most successful SR team for 20 years yet no one wants to pick them(except me). Try Ryan Lonergan as halfback for a start!

J
John 99 days ago

Who would you select Margaret? Lonergan, Muirhead, Cale?

O
OJohn 101 days ago

An intelligent coach knows who the best players are on day one.

M
Mitch 101 days ago

A penny for the thoughts of Brett Hodgson on the Wallabies defence after Laurie Fisher's thoughts on last year's defensive system implemented by Hodgson.

D
DS 101 days ago

Can never win as a selector:


"Get rid of the tired old guard"


"Select and stick - how can you build combinations without experience?"


Only way to silence the experts- winning :)

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search