Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Extraordinary case' made Charlie Ewels irresistible to the Bulls

(Photo by Chris Lee/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Bulls boss Jake White has explained that their temporary signing of England lock Charlie Ewels is an “extraordinary case”, insisting that it won’t open the floodgates for overseas players to come and play their rugby in South Africa. The 27-year-old Bath lock hasn’t played since his serious training ground knee injury with England last June.

ADVERTISEMENT

His Gallagher Premiership club have just three games remaining this season in a campaign that will conclude on May 6. That limited schedule would leave Ewels without enough comeback games to demonstrate to new England head coach Steve Borthwick that he can play a capable part at Rugby World Cup 2023.

It’s a situation that has resulted in Bath boss Johann van Graan facilitating a short-term arrangement with his former club Bulls for Ewels to get some Currie Cup action in the coming months so that the second row is better placed to challenge for England inclusion.

Video Spacer

WATCH as Alan Quinlan and Schalk Burger preview the weekend’s Round 17 URC matches

Video Spacer

WATCH as Alan Quinlan and Schalk Burger preview the weekend’s Round 17 URC matches

It is a big deal, an England international moving to the southern hemisphere to get match minutes in his legs, but Bulls coach White doesn’t believe this will now open the door to a slew of non-South African players coming to rugby for the franchises.

“No, I don’t think so,” he said. “This is an extraordinary case. This is about a guy who is 27 years old and trying to get into the World Cup squad. He has a relationship with us through people we know at Bath, he wants to play rugby and we are just happy to have him here.

Related

“I don’t think this is the way forward. I can’t see international players wanting to come and play here when they can earn the salaries they earn overseas. I don’t think it would be fair the way we make up our squads to pick all these overseas-based players. We already have restricted numbers; we already have transformation changes we have got to put into place.

“I can’t see there is going to be an abundance of overseas players coming into our setup. This is a very unique situation – and one that we would like to use in our favour.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Ewels hasn’t been cleared just yet to feature in the URC, the tournament where the Bulls, last year’s beaten finalists, are currently seventh with just two regular-season games remaining before the playoffs. In the Currie Cup, though, the Bulls still have nine regular-season matches left, a schedule that would take Ewels through to June 10 with the Pretoria-based club before the finals.

“I don’t think he is allowed to play in URC,” explained White. “We are still trying to find some paperwork that we need to do and when we get that paperwork, he could quite possibly be available sooner rather than later. But at this point in time, we are still waiting for paperwork.

“It’s a bit of a double win. Firstly, we get a player like him, 30 tests for England, 111 games for Bath, captained the England junior side, won a Junior World Cup – so a lot of experience. Very good in the lineout, so that is a win for us. And for him, he is trying really hard to get into the World Cup set up.

“He needs to play some games, needs to have some rugby under his belt, and it’s very fortunate that if we can get the two married together, he is a gain for us and hopefully we can help him play good rugby and get himself into the mix for the World Cup.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tupou Vaa'i gives first impression of 'big unit' Fabian Holland Tupou Vaa'i on 'big unit' Fabian Holland
Search