Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Faf de Klerk lists surprise candidates to replace him at scrum-half against All Blacks

Faf de Klerk of South Africa looks on during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 semi final match between England and South Africa at Stade de France on October 21, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

South Africa’s Faf de Klerk has said that his approach will not change on Saturday against the All Blacks in the World Cup final despite being the only recognised scrum-half in the squad.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 2019 World Cup winning No9 is set to start alongside Handre Pollard against the All Blacks at the Stade de France, with Willie le Roux being the only back on the bench after Jacques Nienaber named a 7-1 split on the bench.

Nienaber has since explained that left wing Cheslin Kolbe will serve as de Klerk’s back-up, but the scrum-half himself has said that flanker Kwagga Smith will also deputise for him, in what is yet another surprising twist in the Springboks’ selection.

Video Spacer

Jacques Nienaber explains his seven-one bench split

Video Spacer

Jacques Nienaber explains his seven-one bench split

The plan will surely be for de Klerk to play the entire 80 minutes, but both he and his coach seem confident in both Smith and Kolbe filling in for him should he come off.

When asked whether his approach will change now that he may need to play the full match, the 54-cap Springbok said that pacing himself will not end well for the Springboks.

“We’ve played like this before and I’ve played a lot of 80-minute games in my life,” the 32-year-old said. “If you’re going to pace yourself, you’re going to lose this game.”

While de Klerk does seem confident that he can last the entirety of the final, he explained who the back-ups are. He said: “Luckily, we’ve got Kwagga [Smith] covering nine as well, as he doesn’t get tired, so that’s fine. Cheslin’s also been training there, so we’ve got back-up, but hopefully I can be there at the end when we win. I just have to make sure I’m recovered well for the game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

De Klerk will be lining up against longtime rival Aaron Smith in Paris, who will be playing his 125th and final ever game for the All Blacks before retiring from Test rugby. The South African was full of praise for his opponent when looking ahead to the final, describing him as the “gel” for the All Blacks.

“The way they’ve turned it around this year after playing [and losing to] us and the French shows a team who is close together, and the belief they have,” the Yokohama Canon Eagles No9 said.

“They had a lot of scrutiny after those games but they’ve turned it around and are playing unbelievable rugby. Playing with a lot more confidence. It’s good to see a side who can internally sort things out.

“They have such great players and leaders and I think Aaron Smith is one of the best guys for that. He’s the gel, on and off the field, sharing his experiences and getting through tough times in his career. He’s been a great player for New Zealand and one of the guys I’ve definitely looked up to. Hopefully I can get one over on him for this game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

6 Comments
s
strachan 436 days ago

Mouthwatering contest is almost here. Looking ahead to the pinnacle of world rugby stage.

F
Fritz 436 days ago

The kiwis played only 2 games this year against a full strength Bok team and got played off the field both times, the 1st one in South Africa and the one just before the world cup.

p
paul 436 days ago

Gee I hope that move backfires on them. NZ need to pick Roigard as backup again. Spaces will come once those backs tire. Keep the ball moving and NZ can boss this game in the last 20.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 6 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

on the article "Why defensive aggressor Felix Jones will drive new-look England" I said:


"Look at the kick:pass ratio from England’s games under Borthwick:

Italy 20:100

Argentina 50:100

South Africa 53:100

Fiji 24:100

Samoa 22:100

Chile 12:100

Japan 25:100

Argentina 55:100

Fiji 30:100

Ireland 21:100

Wales 24:100

Wales 13:100

Ireland 26:100

France 22:100

Wales 26:100

Italy 23:100

Scotland 18:100

The average is 27:100

The average in games we have won is 28:100

The average in games we have lost is 26:100, but these averages are skewed by the fact that we have tended to kick less and pass more against worse sides

The average in games where we have beaten current top 10 sides is 35:100

The average in games where we have beaten current top 8 sides is 39:100

The average in games where we have beaten current top 7 sides is 53:100

The average in games where we have lost to teams currently ranked lower than us is 20:100"


on the article "Four talking points after England's narrowest-ever win over Italy" I said:


"Look at the kick:pass ratio from England’s last 8 games

Italy 20:100

Argentina 50:100

South Africa 53:100

Fiji 24:100

Samoa 22:100

Chile 12:100

Japan 25:100

Argentina 55:100

So (1) England spread it wide more yesterday than against anyone bar Chile, and (2) all of england’s best performances have been when we kick loads, and in every match where we kick loads we have had a good performance."


"In particular you're neglecting the impact of the type of D Felix Jones was trying to introduce, which demanded most of England's training energy at the time."


I'm not, actually, I'm hyper aware of that fact and of its impact. I think it is because of the defence that England's new attack faltered so much for the first three games, something you ignore when you try to judge England's attack in the six nations by taking an average of either the trys scored or the rucks completed over the whole tournament.


"International coaches don't just pick those styles like sweets from a sweet shop!"

Yeah, I know. England's defence wasn't exactly the same as SA's, but it was similar. England's attack did rely on turnovers more than the Irish system did, but it was still pretty similar to it, and then shifted to something similar-but-not-identitcal to the Labit/Nick Evans systems, which are themselves similar but not identical.

105 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ The future of rugby: Sale and Leinster mount the case for the defence The future of rugby: Sale and Leinster mount the case for the defence
Search