Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Faf De Klerk: Why two year hiatus won't hurt Springboks

By PA
Makazole Mapimpi (left) celebrates scoring South Africa's fourth try against Japan with team-mate Faf de Klerk (Photo by Koki Nagahama/Getty Images)

Faf De Klerk believes the Springboks’ World Cup “connection” will help them overcome a long period without Test rugby ahead of tackling the British and Irish Lions.

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa, with scrum-half De Klerk playing a starring role, were crowned world champions after beating England in November 2019.

But due to a combination of the coronavirus pandemic and subsequent travel restrictions, South Africa have not played since.

Video Spacer

The greatest South African rugby side of all time | All Access Springbok Special | RugbyPass

Video Spacer

The greatest South African rugby side of all time | All Access Springbok Special | RugbyPass

They return to action early next month with two games against Georgia, before the three-Test Lions series kicks off in Cape Town on July 24.

“Probably the main thing that will remain with me is the group we were at the World Cup,” said De Klerk, who lines up for Sale Sharks against Gallagher Premiership play-off opponents Exeter on Saturday.

“And there is a majority of that group still in the squad for the Lions series. The connection we had throughout that World Cup, and even before that, is going to help us a lot.

“Even if we haven’t been together for almost two years, we are going to draw a lot on that, and I think it will probably click very quickly just because of the amount of time we spent together, the stuff we went through.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Obviously, there are a few new lads in there as well that are going to add energy and value, and I think the bonds we’ve built over that period of time is probably going to be our main go-to.

“It has definitely been frustrating, especially because a lot of people have said we haven’t played (since 2019) and are we really that good? A lot of doubts start to creep in from supporters and stuff like that.

“But we, as players, knew we didn’t have a say in it, and whatever happened, happened. We needed to accept that, make sure you play well for your club and when the opportunity comes, make sure that you are ready.

“You want that jersey over your head and to play for your country. I can’t wait to hopefully get the opportunity again to pull that jersey on and prove again what we did in the World Cup.”

ADVERTISEMENT

While De Klerk is set to be a key performer for South Africa against the Lions, his immediate focus is a first Premiership final appearance and possible title for Sale since 2006.

They head to champions Exeter on Saturday, just a week after losing 20-19 against the Chiefs despite having a one-man advantage for 26 minutes and leading by 16 points when Exeter lock Sam Skinner was sent off.

“We are disappointed with what happened last weekend,” De Klerk added. “I think our discipline just slipped a little bit.

“I still believe we played pretty decently in that second half, it was just the penalty count started going against us, which gave them field position. It was a good old scrap.

“We know the type of team we can be if we are on it on the day, and the way we started (last Saturday) wasn’t surprising to me at all.

“If we can play like that for 80 minutes, there are not a lot of teams that can stop us.

“We haven’t got to wait seven or eight weeks to play them again. We go straight back in, and we definitely still feel we have got momentum behind us.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search