Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Falling attendance figures could spell the end of the Western Force

Players like Andrew Ready could be in need of a new team if attendance figures for Global Rapid Rugby don't start climbing. (Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

Concerning comments from RugbyWA Chairman John Edwards suggests that things are not all peachy in Western Australia.

ADVERTISEMENT

After being unceremoniously dropped from Super Rugby at the end of 2017, it seemed like the Western Force were doomed to be retired – there was no competition for the team to take part in and little funding provided by the Australian Rugby Union to keep the team alive.

Fans were understandably furious. The Force were dropped at the expense of the Melbourne Rebels – a team with little history and inferior results to the Western Australian team.

It was only when Australian businessman and Force fan Andrew Forrest stepped in to fund a breakaway competition that life was breathed into the Force.

What has eventuated is Global Rapid Rugby, a competition that is barely in its infantile stages but, from the way Edwards is talking, could be on the brink of collapsing.

The first game of this year’s showcase series saw the Western Force competing against a World XV coached by ex-Australia coach Robbie Deans. As with last year’s matches, the crowd was respectable. Almost 11,500 fans turned up to see the Force take the match 26-16, but the attendance figures dropped off considerably for the next match – against the South China Tigers – with fewer than 8,000 showing up in support.

The drop off should not be surprising. Whilst a World XV has a universal appeal, with numerous ex-international lacing up, the Tigers lacked any real star players – a fading Tom Varndell the only name of note.

ADVERTISEMENT

Edwards, however, has indicated that fans will need to turn out in droves regularly if the Force are to have any chance of continuing to operate.

“I see worrying trends and history looming if WA’s rugby community does not fully embrace the Force. I implore you all to consider your own role in maintaining both the Western Force and the exceptional rugby pathways,” Edwards has said in response to the falling attendance figures.

“It’s no secret that (Forrest) has pumped significant funds into the re-creation of Western Force and Global Rapid Rugby.

“It should also be no secret that the Force must be able to stand on its own feet financially.

“This will be the expectation for all teams joining the tournament. It will not survive if you don’t play your part.”

The high attendance figures for the Force’s initial revival series last year should be expected – fans were excited to see there team back playing competitive rugby – but now that the newness has worn off, it also should be expected that attendances will drop back to what you see for Australia’s Super Rugby teams, especially when the Force are playing weaker opposition.

Still, with Forrest still trying to encourage foreign teams to join the competition, Edwards’ words won’t be taken fondly by many. Why join a competition that hinges on a team that is on the edge of extinction?

It seems like the Force are teetering on the precipice. If Western Australians want to have any hope of being represented in top-tier competitions in the future then they’ll have to speak with their feet and turn up for the remaining games in this year’s Global Rapid Rugby competition – Edwards has made that abundantly clear.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search