Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Fans furious there are too many Tigers in England's RWC squad

Ellis Genge tackles Ben Moon during an England training session (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Eddie Jones’ 31-man England World Cup squad has made for some interesting reading with a number of shock call-ups. Bath’s Ruaridh McConnochie and Northampton’s Lewis Ludlam are perhaps the two most interesting call-ups, as is Piers Francis, Ludlam’s fellow Saints player.

ADVERTISEMENT

But one decision that has surprised a number of fans on social media is not so much the personnel in the squad, but the representation from different clubs. 

After the eight-strong contingent provided by Premiership winners Saracens, Leicester Tigers have the most players in the squad with their half-dozen selections. This is despite them finishing in 11th place amid fears throughout the season that they would be relegated. 

On the other hand, table toppers Exeter Chiefs only have three players, as have fourth place Northampton, while third place Gloucester only have one. 

This has not sat well with some fans on Twitter, who feel some players are in the squad based on reputation rather than form. Then again, when looking at the Leicester squad, it is hard to blame Jones for some of his decisions. 

Jonny May and Ben Youngs are two favourites for England, and while Youngs’ form may have dipped slightly over the Six Nations, he was never worthy of being dropped. Manu Tuilagi, who fought back from a succession of injuries last season, is another player that was always likely to make it, simply due to the X-factor that he brings. 

While there was a large number of fans that believed Premiership player of the year Danny Cipriani warranted a place over George Ford, the Tigers fly-half was one of the team’s only bright sparks last season and has always been part of Jones’ plans. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Therefore, at least four of the Tigers players deserve to go to Japan, albeit off the back of a very poor domestic season.

One area that is contentious, however, is the props. Dan Cole, whose international career looked to be over this time last year after missing out on the tour to South Africa, was selected by Jones ahead of Exeter’s Harry Williams. If this was a 50/50 call for Jones, some may be surprised that he opted for a player from an 11th place club side. 

Likewise, Ellis Genge was awarded the third loosehead prop slot after battling with Exeter’s Ben Moon over the past year. Had Jones opted for the two Exeter props, the squad would have looked slightly more fairly represented. 

While the fans certainly have a point about the form of the Leicester players after last season, which will be a concern, it is also hard to argue with many of the selections. This is what has been said: 

ADVERTISEMENT

https://twitter.com/kevin_lsi/status/1161245740376764417?s=20

Questions have also been raised regarding the third most represented side, Bath, who have five players in the squad despite finishing the season in sixth place. 

However, both Anthony Watson and Jonathan Joseph missed large chunks of the season, and Sam Underhill also spent time on the sidelines. Those three could have easily helped their club to a higher finish. 

Ultimately, Jones knows what he is going to get from many of the Leicester players and while they suffered a terrible 2018/19 season by their high standards, the Australian obviously still has faith in them. 

WATCH: England boss Eddie Jones speaks at the announcement of his World Cup squad in Bristol

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 4 hours ago
Rassie Erasmus' Boks selection policy is becoming bizarre

To be fair, the only thing that drives engagement on this site is over the top critiques of Southern Hemisphere teams.


Or articles about people on podcasts criticizing southern hemisphere teams.


Articles regarding the Northern Hemisphere tend to be more positive than critical. I guess to also rile up kiwis and Saffers who seem to be the majority of followers in the comments section. There seems to be a whole department dedicated to Ireland’s world ranking news.


Despite being dialled into the Northern edition - I know sweet fokall about what’s going on in France.


And even less than fokall about what’s cutting in Japan - which has a fast growing, increasingly premium League competition emerging.


And let’s not talk about the pacific. Do they even play rugby Down there.


Oh and the Americas. I’ve read more articles about a young, stargazing Welshman’s foray into NFL than I have anything related to either the north and south continents of the Americas.


I will give credit that the women’s game is getting decent airtime. But for the rest and the above; it’s just pathetic coming from a World Rugby website.


Just consider the innovation emerging in Japan with the pedigree of coaches over there.


There’s so much good we could be reading.


Instead it’s unimaginative “critical for the sake of feigning controversial”. Which is lazy, because in order to pull that off all you need to be really good at is:


1. Being a doos;

2. Having an opinion.


No prior experience needed.


Which is not journalism. That’s like all or most of us in the comments section. People like Finn (who I believe is a RP contributor).


Anyway. Hopefully it will get better. The game is growing and the interest in the game is growing. Maybe it will attract more qualified journalists over time.

19 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Seven stars set to light up the Autumn Nations Series Seven stars set to light up the Autumn Nations Series
Search