Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Andy Farrell's blunt answer to whether Boks' 7-1 made him 'pause'

Head coach Andy Farrell during an Ireland rugby media conference at the Paxton Spa Hotel Paris in Paris, France. (Photo By Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

If the hype around the Springboks’ much-vaunted 7-1 split on the bench is getting to Ireland head coach Andy Farrell – then he certainly isn’t showing it.

ADVERTISEMENT

The bench ratio has been the talk of the pre-game leading into the two sides’ titanic clash in Paris this weekend, with the focus of the media dwelling very much on Jacques Nienaber’s penchant for a bench heavily favouring forwards.

Farrell was of course quizzed on the curious South African tactic in the Ireland team announcement and didn’t attempt to side-step it.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“I think it’s great,” said Farrell. “It obviously suits them and they obviously know their squad and what fits for them and so do we. I did pose the question to our forwards coaches as to whether we should go with seven backs and one forward, but they weren’t up for that! I think it shows they know exactly where they want to go with their game plan and we do the same with the subs we pick as well.”

More pointedly he asked whether it had given him pause for thought, to which Farrell’s response was short and sharp.

Related

“No, not at all, never once.”

What’s more, the 48-year-old doesn’t think the 7-1 split is putting more pressure on his players.

“I don’t see it like that at all [putting pressure on the Ireland players]. I am pretty confident in the five forwards we have got coming off bench and the impact they’re going to have and the type of game we’re going to play when that happens.

“It doesn’t have any bearing as far as that’s concerned. We’ve been able to analyse them with the seven-one split, and not that much changes. Obviously they are fresh and they got dominance set-piece-wise in that game [a warm-up test against New Zealand] but we would back our players to do the same.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I don’t know, it doesn’t really bother me. It is just about us. We have to be good, we have to play really well to beat the world champions because they are in good form. Barring us and our team and management and the Irish people all over the world, I think everyone thinks they’re the favourites and they’re going to win this game. I can see why because of the form they’ve shown in the last couple of games. But we don’t think like that. We are ready for a tough battle and it will take its own course.”

“There are all sort of different permutations. Even with a five-three split, you can’t cover everything. But you need to be adaptable, which is something we have worked hard at with our planning over the last few years. I suppose they have done exactly the same with the seven-one split. I love it, I respect it. I like the fact they know their squad and brought four scrum-halves over, a hooker who has not really played in that specialist position before. It shows they know their players and which direction they want to go. Hopefully they think the same about us as well.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
C
Cam 452 days ago

This'll be one of the biggest clashes so far! Farrell's lads aren't #1 without reason and have done well with their tactics; the same with the SA squad. I wish for a fair game, some sound reffing and no injuries!

p
pauline 453 days ago

If they've found a system that works for them good luck to them. If it wins games!

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 55 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Yes I was the one who suggested to use a UEFA style point. And I guessed, that based on the last 5 years we should start with 6 top14, 6 URC and 4 Prem."

Yes I am aware that you suggested it, but you then went on to say that we should initially start with a balance that clearly wasn't derived from that system. I'm not a mind reader, so how was I to work out that you'd arrived at that balance by dint of completely having failed to remember the history of the competition.


"Again, I was the one suggesting that, but you didn't like the outcome of that."

I have no issues with the outcome of that, I had an issue with a completely random allocation of teams that you plucked out of thin air.

Interestingly its you who now seem to be renouncing the UEFA style points system, because you don't like the outcome of reducing URC representation.


"4 teams for Top14, URC and Prem, 3 teams for other leagues and the last winner, what do you think?"

What about 4 each + 4 to the best performing teams in last years competition not to have otherwise qualified? Or what about a UEFA style system where places are allocated to leagues on the basis of their performance in previous years' competitions?

There's no point including Black Lion if they're just going to get whitewashed every year, which I think would be a possibility. At most I'd support 1 team from the Rugby Europe Super Cup, or the Russian Championship being included. Maybe the best placed non-Israeli team and the Russian winners could play off every year for the spot? But honestly I think its best if they stay limited to the Challenge Cup for now.

39 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ireland centre Bundee Aki ends speculation with decision over future Ireland centre Bundee Aki ends speculation with decision over future
Search